|
Angey T.'s Comments
Mar 4, 2009
|
comments: 21
Feb 6, 2007
|
comments: 25
Oct 14, 2006
|
comments: 4
Sep 14, 2006
|
comments: 3
Sep 17, 2006
|
comments: 29
Sep 14, 2006
|
comments: 2
Sep 14, 2006
|
comments: 2
Hey, Gather! Clark Kent is owned by DC Comics! Isn't that a Copyright violation?
by
Christopher K. Leavitt
Sep 14, 2006
|
comments: 26
Sep 6, 2006
|
comments: 5
Sep 6, 2006
|
comments: 2
Sep 6, 2006
|
comments: 7
Sep 6, 2006
|
comments: 6
Sep 6, 2006
|
comments: 1
Sep 6, 2006
|
comments: 1
Sep 6, 2006
|
comments: 3
Sep 1, 2006
|
comments: 7
|
|
|
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.
Trust me, tell her she is better off waiting for it to hit cable, and watching it for free. Do not attempt to purchase this movie for her. Yes, the cover makes it look great, but it isn't even worth wiping my own butt with.
Sorry, but that is how much I disliked the sequel. If you are looking for a cheap remake of a great film, then sure, the 2nd one is good for that, but not if you are truly a fan of the first one looking for a great sequel.
Reminds me of those films you would rent with Japanese actors, but had an American overlay of the talking. Remember those?