Marty K.'s Comments

Do Liberals and Barack Hussein Obama Characterize the Real America? by Marty K.

Mar 13, 2009 | comments: 26

Marty K. Mar 17, 2009, 7:28pm EDT

Sam , quiite frankly I don't care WHAT you think, and I also don't appreciate your lies. In typical liberal fashion, you have no tolerance for what I've expressed under FREEDOM OF SPEECH. YOU are the one who does not know history. This country was founded on Judeo-Christian values and it thrived all of this time being one nation under God.

Whenever a liberal such as you wants to shut people up and go against their right of free speech, false accusations such as you've presented are made because you can't stand to bear the truth of what's been presented.

In addition, Sam, please learn so spell and/or proofread before replying and accusing others of "ignorance."

Do Liberals and Barack Hussein Obama Characterize the Real America? by Marty K.

Mar 13, 2009 | comments: 26

Marty K. Mar 14, 2009, 5:06pm EDT

Thanks. Nor have I violated anyone's freedom of speech by removing their posts, except for some of Erik's, which were just childish insults (such as "bwaaa noises," ect) and did not qualify for a board with grown people. His other posts, however, are still up.

Do Liberals and Barack Hussein Obama Characterize the Real America? by Marty K.

Mar 13, 2009 | comments: 26

Marty K. Mar 14, 2009, 2:03pm EDT

Sam, I ALREADY MENTIONED in my article that AMERICA-HATING PEOPLE SUCH AS YOU would be offended by "slavery" in the days of the founders; yet, you are apparently against my FREEDOM SPEECH express my views and apparently would want be to be a slave, as well.

Ironically, you may or may not have even thought of complaining about it, HAD I NOT BROUGHT IT UP FIRST!

The slave situation was an unfortunate occurrence, but guess what, Sam - it was CORRECTED and if there were no decent men, it would NOt have been corrected. THESE ARE THE FACTUAL GROUNDS YOU HAVE REQUESTED.

However, Sam, will you and the other GATHER LIBERALS now be satisified, or happy about anything I say? I think not. Nor do I think you and they will have respect for my right to Freedom of Speech

So why don't you stop loitering around the kitchen, yourself?

Do Liberals and Barack Hussein Obama Characterize the Real America? by Marty K.

Mar 13, 2009 | comments: 26

Marty K. Mar 14, 2009, 12:59am EDT

Sam, why don't you point out exactly what is "non-sensical," instead of just babbling that it is? It is only "non-sense" in your opinion, because you do not understand or recognize the truth. You are a typical Gather Liberal and an Obamaite, no doubt.

Well, never mind. I don't think I'm going waste much more time on here, if any. The only responses are from a bunch of clueless people. Honestly, this is rather disappointing. I hae better ways to spend my time.

Do Liberals and Barack Hussein Obama Characterize the Real America? by Marty K.

Mar 13, 2009 | comments: 26

Marty K. Mar 14, 2009, 12:30am EDT

Erik, it is not "only interesting to me," but it is interesting to other sensible people as well. However, not too many appear to exist on this site, and I have encountered you Gather Liberals on previous occasions, so I knew what to expect.

Regardless, it will be a cold day in heck when you're able to outclass me. In fact, it doesn't appear that you have much class at all with your name calling and girlish silly noise posts that I've had to remove. However, no half-way sensible posts have been eliminated.

Do Liberals and Barack Hussein Obama Characterize the Real America? by Marty K.

Mar 13, 2009 | comments: 26

Marty K. Mar 14, 2009, 12:24am EDT

It's only your own version of reality, Nanina. It's what you've been taught by liberals and Socialists. I know exactly what responses will occur before I post, and I know exactly how people think. I also know they have been conditioned to believe as they do.

Do Liberals and Barack Hussein Obama Characterize the Real America? by Marty K.

Mar 13, 2009 | comments: 26

Marty K. Mar 13, 2009, 11:33pm EDT

No, I don't recall any of it.

I didn't say "recall;" I said "review." Besides, your name says "Erik," not "Nanina" (even though you sound more like a "Nanina").

Michelle Obama's Thesis by C A.

Jun 26, 2008 | comments: 24

Marty K. Mar 13, 2009, 11:23pm EDT

...I find B. Hussein Obama (put that in there just for you Lady N) to be naïve, Marxist-leaning, and thoroughly unqualified to serve as our...President. I have stated before, and will so again, that the man is a bumper sticker. This country needs a seasoned, savvy, and serious person to guide us through these dangerous times.

I couldn't agree more.

Do Liberals and Barack Hussein Obama Characterize the Real America? by Marty K.

Mar 13, 2009 | comments: 26

Marty K. Mar 13, 2009, 11:20pm EDT

At the time of the founding fathers, you wouldn't have wanted to be a female, or anything but Caucasian.

Nanina, if you review my article, I predicted there would be people similar to you finding fault with the founders. People who would regard them as "slave owners," and such. You are the exact type of person I was referencing and predicted would respond.

Ironically, women of that time were not contentious and were not feminists. HOWEVER...you will only interpret this to mean that they were "oppressed and too meek to stand up for themselves." That is the liberal, feminist way of thinking, and it is also the way all fairly young people (say, under 40 or so) have been trained and conditoned to believe.

Unfortunately, it represents a lack of understanding and a disdain for America and our DECENT founders. I largely blame the school system and certainly the liberal agenda for this very sad indoctrination.

Do Liberals and Barack Hussein Obama Characterize the Real America? by Marty K.

Mar 13, 2009 | comments: 26

Marty K. Mar 13, 2009, 10:20pm EDT

Sam C, who must be one of the Gather Liberals/Obamaites has just presented his own nonsense, while unable to refute the facts of this article.

He believes that "Rush Limbaugh" and "Repubicans" are the problem, instead of Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic Party from heck. This represents the thinking today's people who have apparently undergone a mass mesmerization and brainwashing.

Sadly, people such Sam refuse to see or acknowledge the people who are causing the problems and he places the blame on the people who actually do have sense.

The Howling Men of Gitmo: Is Obama Lost in the Twilight Zone? by Marty K.

Feb 4, 2009 | comments: 18

Marty K. Feb 4, 2009, 9:56pm EST

I didn't say I wanted it to remain indefinitely. I just find it frightening that Obama makes this one of his first priorities, in his first few days in office. It's as though the terrorists come first and underneath it all, Obama's mind consists of a world socialist mentality.

Imagine if you hired someone to work at your home, and he or she started doinjg things you didn't feel comfortable with right away, but may have felt comfortable with later on, after the priorities were settled. You would sense something was not quite right and you'd be hard pressed to trust that person. Sociopaths and people who are treacherous display a timing that is off, and not in synch with what should be transpiring.

I can understand some of your points technically, but I just don't trust Obama. He seems to have a hate and a far-out Socialist mindset. There was no reason for him to jump on this in the first few days, and this scares the wits out of me, but people who have sympathy for the enemy will believe it to be wonderful, and will praise their savior's actions.

Would Sarah Palin be a Better President than Barack Obama? by Marty K.

Sep 6, 2008 | comments: 13

Marty K. Sep 6, 2008, 12:11pm EDT

I have read the link Ron provided. However, it's from CNN and it presents more their guy Obama's class envy/ wealth redistirubiton agenda, according to his Marxist orientation.

"Obama: High-income taxpayers would pay more in taxes..."

The top 10 percent of wage earners pay 70 percent of the federal tax bill. The bottom 50 percent pay 2.9 percent. How much more does Obama want business owners to pay, before they're driven out of business or before they relocate overseas? What will Obama do or say when widespead unemployment results, possibly causing a widespread depression in the United States, with food lines?

"...while everyone else's tax bill would be reduced."

Yes, it will be reduced to zero, because many will be unemployed!

"Those who benefit the most - in terms of reducing their taxes as a percentage of after-tax income - are in the lowest income groups."

Why, because Obama says so? Look at the clever wordage that is used, to twist the truth and deceive people. Are you people so gullible that you actually think Obama is going to be like some sort of hero that goes after the rich that you despise, while lowering your taxes? If so, I don't believe that many people are even qualified to vote.

With all due respect, many appear to be deceived by Obama's deceptions, just as some people believe in pyramid schemes. Obama's agenda is based on demonic logic, and it therefore might work in hell; but it will not work in the United States. He will insitgate higher capital gains taxes and yet more higher taxes in every aspect of our lives.

In addition, he stands for every horrible liberal cause known to mankind. Again with respect, people supportint this man appear to be either betrayers, chronic simpletons or victims of socialist/liberal brainwashing.

It just doesn't get any worse than Obama, and he is at the bottom of the barrel.

Thanks! :)

Would Sarah Palin be a Better President than Barack Obama? by Marty K.

Sep 6, 2008 | comments: 13

Marty K. Sep 6, 2008, 1:25am EDT

Au contraire, Ron. Barack Obama is the one who will harm businesses, individuals and the entire country with his tax plans, and he could actually bring about a depression. My writing is truthful, not "confused," and I respectfully submit that Democrats have confused minds, generally speaking. They are also appear to be trying to confound everyone, and their recent attacks have been nothing short of disgraceful.

I do appreciate YOUR respectful post, however.

Barack Hussein Obama: A Revealing Interview by Marty K.

Jun 10, 2008 | comments: 75

Marty K. Jun 13, 2008, 2:03pm EDT

Ron, I assure you the liberal media exists, just as I assure you the sun shines. Your examples don't really mean a lot. I'm not going to argue too vehmently, though, because you do look like a rather tough guy.

Barack Hussein Obama: A Revealing Interview by Marty K.

Jun 10, 2008 | comments: 75

Marty K. Jun 13, 2008, 12:05pm EDT

Joseph, the quote did not actually say "liberal," and I don't like George Bush that well either, only as a lesser evil, really. I have never really bought into George Bush being a liar. Be mindful that just about all of the major Dems supported the Iraq war and WMD information initially. They mainly changed their tune later when they understood it was strategically correct to do so.

Barack Hussein Obama: A Revealing Interview by Marty K.

Jun 10, 2008 | comments: 75

Marty K. Jun 11, 2008, 1:29am EDT

Thanks, Don. It is indeed an Obamanoid response, and also one from a Gather Liberal.

"Anytime anyone uses his middle name 'Hussein' you know their agenda."

So then, Catherine, by your own admission, Barack Hussein Obama has an agenda, because HE is using the name "Hussein," as you indicate.

"It's a cheap display of bigotry and fear mongering..."

Why, because you say so? Stuart and I presented a lot of respectful, accurate information. Your statement is a typical response from a liberal, when the said liberal is unable to dispute the facts. Furthermore, the reason I use his middle name is because (1) That is his name, and (2) I use it because I feel that liberals should not be trying to restrict my Freedom of Speech and tell me what I can use and what I can't use.

His name is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, just as we have presidential names such as John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, William Jefferson Clinton and many others.

Because you can't argue the facts, YOU are the one attacking ME on something as trivial as a middle name. You search for something such as this when you can't win on real merit.

Barack Hussein Obama Lashes Out - Is He Losing It? by Marty K.

May 20, 2008 | comments: 16

Marty K. May 22, 2008, 2:16pm EDT

I agree, Mark. It pretty much come down to whether one decides to support the far lesser of two evils, or allow the greater of the two evils to get in. Because I beileve that McCain is about 65 per cent okay, I will support him and I hope that he can be reasoned out of his liberal brainwashing.

I thought it was awful when he apologized for that conservative guy on the radio who made some form of remark - I can't remember what it was. And I hope that McCain can be reasoned out of wasting time with global warming.

In spite of all his faults, I am encouraging my readers to support him. Barack Hussein Obama is horrible beyond belief, and you have hit the nail on the head regarding the fact that the media wants him in. His liberal positions are being downplayed and I haven't heard him once talk about his pro-abortion, pro-gay viewpoints and a lot of other agendas. He will raise taxes and the moronic minimum wage. He will appease terrorists and he will be the guy they want in.

The people voting for Obama are betrayers of the worst order - as bad as those who voted for Slick Willly (and were never held accountable), or worse. I'd rather do business with Benedict Arnold. At least he was honest about his treachery, and you with what you were dealing.

Meanderings of the Day: Bush is Blamed, Obama, Gay Marriage, ECT. by Marty K.

May 16, 2008 | comments: 16

Marty K. May 21, 2008, 2:47pm EDT

Karen,

I only love Republicans as a lesser of two evils, and because they seem better by comparison. I'm really more of an independent conservative. I'm sure you could find a lot of individual examples who are liars or hypocrites, but at least they stand for sound principles, as opposed to wanting to throw away sane law altogether, in favor of what feels good. However, I'm more concerned about what individuals stand for, as opposed to party names.

Barack Hussein Obama Lashes Out - Is He Losing It? by Marty K.

May 20, 2008 | comments: 16

Marty K. May 21, 2008, 6:46am EDT

To the posters mentioning McCain: Whatever faults McCain has or doesn't have is not a valid arguement. TO GIVE AN ANALOGY, when arguing against gay marriage ( http://www.urlpire.com/?VSTBJ ), homosexuals often point to the faults of heterosexual marriage ( http://urlpill.com/438 ), which is a different topic. The faults of heterosexual couples, though existent, have nothing to do with the argument at hand (if it happens to be about gay marriage).

By the same token, the faults of McCain do not excuse the faults of Obama. However, I believe that McCain is a saint compared to Obama, in spite of McCain's faults (I maintain that McCain's faults stem from the fact that he's too liberal).

Also, thanks to the posters giving me a high, complimentary rating.

Barack Hussein Obama Lashes Out - Is He Losing It? by Marty K.

May 20, 2008 | comments: 16

Marty K. May 20, 2008, 2:43pm EDT

Janet - thanks for the Ten rating, even though you call me a "hater." Where is there evidence of any "hate?"