|
David D.'s Comments
Public Trial? Or Secret Testimony? COURT RULES THAT AIPAC TRIAL MUST BE OPEN
by
Steve A, Federation of American Scientists
Apr 19, 2007
|
comments: 1
Apr 11, 2007
|
comments: 4
|
|
|
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.
In your article you mention that Judge Ellis refered to the government's strategy as "novel", but I was wondering if you could elaborate on whether there is any established precident for the Silent Witness Rule? Additionally, it seems that there are an increasing number of cases where federal prosecuters are attempting to circumvent the law in the name of secrecy and classified material. Do you see this as a growing trend, or merely a practice that has attracted more attention as of late?