I now strongly advise you all to heed my lengthy commentary. Believe me, it's of utter importance, you doing so!
Before I take you deep into this, I proclaim; one magnificent odyssey and one powerful enigmatic journey for thought, I wanted to first privy you into commentary I project will be a miraculous awakening for you all. This all that I speak of is you, the citizens of these United States of America primarily, but also to all the citizens of the known world --- to all of humanity that is.
First if you don't mind, I have a couple of questions for you!
Would you believe that the foundation of world religions was founded when men dug under a tree and pulled out some of the most beautiful looking mushrooms? Would you believe that these men then blindly consumed these mushrooms and got so high that they subsequently created every God known to man? God's that many of you faithfully follow and faithfully worship.
That's just something for you all to think about!
Are you by any chance familiar with that Old Norse myth: Dooms Day, Judgement Day, the end of the world? In my studies, not a following, of all the worlds religions; I've discovered many things in my research that have me somewhat flummoxed and at times astounded. In my Christian studies, again; not a following, in particular; I've asked myself this question repeatedly: Who really rules the world? Many people would blindly and boldly answer --- God, who else.
Well, I found in my studies of the Christian faith that neither Jesus Christ nor his Father, Mother; what have you, is the real rulers. In quoting from John 12:31; 14:30; and 16:11; Jesus said, "The ruler of this world will be cast out and that the ruler of the world is coming." He, she, or it also stated that "this ruler has no hold over he." Therefore, this would mean that the ruler of this world, no matter their proclaimed belief system, is in direct opposition to Jesus Christ.
People, go ahead and ask yourself the very question that's currently making its way steadily through the cortexes of your mind aloud: Who could this be? The feeble efforts of humanity makes me sick to my stomach, for the world has suffered and continues to suffer to this very day terribly; proving one fact true: nothings changed.
All of humanity says they want peace on earth and good will towards men! However, the reality of it all is; we kill one another, hate one another, despise one another, plot against one another, etc., and we collectively do this with utter viciousness on the regular. Humanity; remember, a collective that supposedly wants peace on earth and good will towards men is the inventors of so much monstrous cruelty proving that this could never be. Merciless and heinous methods persisting of torture and slaughter. The inventors of napalm bombs, torture; both physical and psychological, gas chambers, flame-throwers, concentration camps, even quite possibly Aids: a biological weapon that unfortunately got away from its inventors.
Do you believe that humanity --- a collective that supposedly longs for peace and happiness are capable of such deviance against others? What lures humanity to take part in such deeds or coaxes them into such situations where we feel compelled to act with such viciousness? Have you ever wondered if someone is leading the way, an invisible force tempting you and I to commit such inhumane acts?
I bet that many of you boldly accuse Satan of this deviance; right. Well, in my studies and in my research, again; not a following, I've come to an opinionated conclusion. Of course, that is if in fact this world is some sort of middle earth that's unfortunately nestled between two warring forces; heaven and hell; one of good and one of bad. Man, in my opinion, is both the God and the Devil in one, battling amongst himself. I ask you now; are you contemplating the probabilities and possibilities in my commentary?
I pray that you do!
I so pray that you are!
I believe and according to many faithfully enthralled in the Christian faith or in the study thereof, that the Christian bible contains information about the future. That is if, in my opinion, this ingeniously written and fantastically marketed text is the work of utter truth and not the work of fiction.
If in fact this text is of utter truth, I found that the literary content therein sporadically foretells events that lead to the end of the world. The apocalyptic Book of Daniel and Book of Revelation are said to predict that "he who controls Jerusalem in the final days will control the world".
NOW CONTEMPLATE OUR CURRENT FORAY INTO THE MIDDLE EAST!
I ask of you all to reflect back to the aforementioned passage on two very important occasions. First; after you complete your read of my extensive four part article, and second; upon you completing your read of my debut novel Conspirator's Odyssey: The Evolution of the Patron Saint. I ask of you all to reflect back to the aforementioned passage just to see if you happened to notice, in my commentary, the probabilities and possibilities herein. I ask this of you, especially when the subject of our countries current President George W. Bush comes into play. Again, after your read, also ask yourself this question: Is the Bush family apart of a collective dictatorship that's using their power for personal gain and the gain of corporate interests?
The Christian bible tells its faithful followers to turn the other cheek. In the same and in clear contradiction to the aforementioned, this text also tells these faithful followers that for an eye, an eye shall be taken. As blatantly forthright as the bible has proven to be, can also be contributed to the life and times of mankind, for we; as a species, are just as backwards as this age-old text in question. I'm not in the least sorry for my comments either, for I just feel all of that shit's for the birds!
Tell me this, why is it that when we refer too this entity known as God, we as a species boldly refer to he, she, or it as he? Who in the hell are we to place labels upon an entity supposedly as powerful as we make he, she, or it out to be? Don't laugh, I know the bible promotes God to be a man, but the hell with that; the literature written within this Christian text was and has always been the work of man.
People act as if I'm suppose to believe that, in some omnipotent way, this entity known as God decided to pull out he, she, or its dusty Universal Underwood typewriter and jot down a few things. That God wrote a text that would ultimately manifest into one of the greatest stories ever told. That ultimately he, she, or its literature manifested a text that all of "God's" feared and faithful followers would follow too their deaths. Faithfully following a text, yet never fully understanding even a fraction of its purpose and meaning; that is if it truly has one!
It's a blind following!
These people; followers that is, are completely blind, for they collectively refuse to comprehend that their belief system is a product of evolutionary conditioning.
I find it a riot though!
Think about it; man has even conditioned --- manipulated that is, our precious givers of life, women, into believing this "he" shit as well. Ladies, by falling pray to this "he" shit, you might as well pay homage to the most hated man known by women: Sigmund Freud, Austrian neurologist and founder of psychoanalysis.
How warped are you?
How warped are we as a people --- a species that is?
Don't worry though! We've been misled since day one! Since a time when Mother Earth (Gaia) permitted us to live in existence upon her surface! Since a time when this planet lye barren and from the heavens dropped the DNA of a piss poor race: the human race. A race that is both physically and psychologically inferior! A warped subservient hybrid race that was planted upon this world to be titled humanoids from an extended extraterrestrial existence.
Since a time when a plan was put into play by this extraterrestrial race to procreate; a species was created, for fear of interplanetary extinction; only to remain upon a planet at which mankind eventually named: EARTH. Until this day, our creators remain with us, categorizing, monitoring, and evaluating this species of their strategic creation. The purpose for, which is still unknown, as planet earth could, in actuality; be some sort of cattle farm raising free-range humanoids for their extraterrestrial diets.
Come on people, I know that I'm not alone here; who the hell really knows?
The human race may be, thus far, supposedly the kings and queens of this planet, but one notch lower on the evolutionary and food chain than previously assumed. Think back to the loss of life throughout the decades. The ever-baffling happenings of the Bermuda Triangle for one, the daily disappearances of mothers, fathers, children, etc.; this all without a trace.
Think about it!
This plan even stretched as far as to reveal themselves too us throughout the centuries. This is what motivated these, the first of the humanistic species to write, however undeveloped their ability to literately convey a clear message. This subspecies; the humanoid, did only what mankind have always, and that is record what they seen of the many baffling anomalies that surrounded them from day to day.
This motivated these people to write of these sightings and appearances as if what they were looking upon were Gods, for these creatures obviously had abilities far more superior than their own. Beings that had the power of flight: winged creatures (Angels) they wrote! Beings that were able to fathom and move unmovable stones without hands and only with the whistle of sound, creating structures that until this day, remains an architectural mystery: the Egyptian pyramids. In every arrival of these anomalies, their entrance was and has always been by way of smoke and fire: the arrival of God (the creator) they wrote.
As time evolved, these beings continued to appear to our species, when this experiment elevated and moved into its next phase. A phase that would travel the psyche of generation after generation of humanities ongoing futile existence: the Holy Bible and the contradictory literary contents therein, were created! This creation was just after the death of a supposed man that would be a lasting symbol for mankind. An extraterrestrial was cloaked in the skin of a humanoid and the first of a successful intermingling was initiated: Jesus was born. Jesus was written as the only begotten son of smoke and fire, for this is what the anomaly (Jesus Christ) levitated and vanished into after he, she, or its resurrection.
What I do know, is that mankind will never; ever be able to figure out the alien within him or herself, as man is but a shell that ignorantly refers to this alien as their sole. This is the way it has been since this world and mankind came into existence, for these internal aliens infinite purpose is, has, and will always be to deceive mankind, to inveigle mankind, but primarily to obfuscate mankind.
Pragmatic author A.K. Kuykendall has a passion for writing conspiracy, espionage, horror, and suspense literature that blends the concepts of fact and fiction. For more information on his projects, visit http://www.thewriterofbooks.com/ or to email the author directly for Q&A on this article, write to info@thewriterofbooks.com


Comments: 20 ( 10 removed by A.K. Kuykendall )
The scriptural references - John 12:31; 14:30; and 16:11 - are taken out of context. In each case, the "Prince of this World" refers to the local Roman Ruler, not a long term entity.
I will point out, also, that there is no place in scripture where the scriptures are said to be without error. In fact with a little thought, and some knowledge about how the scriptures were written, will show that this is the one thing the scriptures cannot say, even if it were true (and I doubt that it is)!
I find it more fantastic to think of the creation of man from some extra-terrestrial source than from some terrestrial source, although the extra-terrestrial source can make for some good stories.
One fact that many people, and most the people I know that care are Christian, make a mistake in that they believe in an omnipotent, omnipresent, God, but don't realize that if this is so, then s/he/it had to be just as available to the Budda as to the early Jews.
So, whether "God" is called "Jehovah," "Allah," "Gaia," or what have you, whether God is referred to in the singular, or the plural, or as a "force," or, simply, as the sum total of the Universe, it all refers to the same thing.
I might also mention that I have seen some indication that the problem with using "he" for God may be linguistic. That is, it seems rather inappropriate to refer to God as "it," therefore, English (and other languages) lacking any form of referring to entities other than "it, he, or she" historically just used "he." I wish there were a way of changing this, but I don't know how to go about it.
I guess my major complaint is referring to religion as a negative. I recall a quote from "Forbidden Planet," "[to keep people from becoming evil] That's why we have laws and religion." Too many people forget this.
Thank you for your comment, Sir and for your rather well versed view. I'm speechless!
Remember ma'am, as you proceed on to the next phase of my four part article; keep an open mind.
I would say welcome to Zion, but it seems that you've been detached from the Matrix for quite some time now. Your assessment is wise, straight forward, and fearless. I'm a fan of yours; sincerely. I would love to get your take on my novel Conspirator's Odyssey: The Evolution of the Patron Saint. I guarantee you'll never look at the Roswell incident the same way again.
Visit the site where 'truth reads through fiction' at www.thewriterofbooks.com
Again, thank you for your comments!
No! No!
When I first heard of AIDS, I remember my first thought was pestilence permitted to plague mankind because of our refusal to practice control of our primal instincts. It was not until I saw how AIDS runs rampant in Africa that I thought it "quite [possible that] Aids: [could have been] a biological weapon" to be used exterminate a race of people.
I have pondered events in Genesis originating around Euphrates river and other bodies of water in Africa as being the reason scientists seek to confirm the bang theory is the reason we exist rather the matrix of mankind begins in Africa.
As you stated, "[t]he ever-baffling happenings of the Bermuda Triangle for one, the daily disappearances of mothers, fathers, children, etc.; this all without a trace." I entertained that thought at one point, but dismissed it because of other possibilities such as parents or guardians who choose the extreme measure of kidnapping.
I have been reading quite a bit where people, in their studies, have found other possibilities for our existence. I also keep in mind it was predicted there will be such findings, such doctrine. There have been extra terrestrial events in the scriptures strong enough to support a high probability of life beyond earth; and then, there is reference to a life within our flesh frames conducted by our inner man.
I will keep an open mind as I read your bold assessments.
Thank you for your thought provoking reply. And for you keeping an open mind! It's necessary when reading anything I write as my overall objective's not so easily transparent. I leave you with something that might put into perspective what it is that I'm attempting to achieve in my writing:
Socrates, the Greek philosopher, taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once they start to question and analyze every belief they ever held dear. If a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it should be kept. If it does not, the belief should not only be discarded, but the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous information in the first place, and for what purpose. Not surprisingly, this type of teaching didn't sit well with the ruling elite of Greece. Many political leaders throughout history have sought to sway the masses for reasons both "good" and "bad." Socrates was tried for "subversion" and for "corrupting the youth." He was then forced to take his own life by drinking poison. It has never been easy to be an independent thinker! Today, our ruling government/media complex does not kill people for pursuing the truth about the world (at least not yet). They simply label them as "extremists" or "paranoid," destroying careers and reputations in the process. For many, this is a fate equal to drinking hemlock.
Again, thank you for your comments!
If the existence of covert societies is true, then they must know the words of one who pursues truth are strengthened by their death; especially through assassination. The reason I say this is due, in part, to their brilliance to exist at all, if such is the case. With all that's going on within the masses, there is enough work to be done at the civilian level within each nationality present in America and abroad.
History has shown death has not stopped the pursuit of truth or the exposure of public officials who speak publicly of supporting America, but commit treason financially. Who can stop them, and then why stop them? To say the answer is obvious, is not sufficient.
Why stop the monarcjhy or upper class, so to speak, from their exploits when their mindset is decentralized to lower echelons of government? There are blocks of elitist societies all over the world existing to carryout missions deemed necessary for them. Why not just let them exist without interference seeing the efforts of others to stop them have been futile?
I don't know. Maybe I need to go "shroomin' " again to get ready for part !!. I can appreciate your vantage point, thoughtfully chosen words and audacious assumptions. Yet having contemplated some of your other posts I am intrigued to see where you are going. Seems like quite a ruse. I guess we'll have to see.
One day? Four years and counting.
I am waiting for his response to Bonnie's statement "If the existence of covert societies is true," In plain site Bonnie S. plain site.
D.B. D., if covert societies are "in plain [sight]" then they are not a secret.
Aaron, I hope my comments won't stop this discussion because my intent is to be unbiased.
Case in point.
I have seen numerous cases where judges not only open a court session stating their affirmation to their oath to uphold the individuals sovereign rights according to the constitution but then reaffirm them to certain people both plaintiffs and defendants and in the vary next breath blatantly strip them of all their rights not letting them speak in their defense, counter things being said or presented that are not the truth and have never even occurred while blocking relevant evidence. Their counsel, wether appointed or paid, advises them to "let it go" fabricating a public record. Statements that are made in the court on the record become "facts of record" if they are not denied or objected to. The next time the court is in session they are referred to as "facts" wether they've ever occurred or not. Another common practice is for counsel and prosecutors to testify as if they were witness and party to the events in question. Aside form this being unconstitutional it is strictly prohibited in the federal rules of procedure and evidence as well as every code of conduct published by the BAR. Which in and of itself is and unconstitutional monopoly over the courts.
Most people are unaware what's happening to them until it's too late.
I think we can manage an open minded conversation. If you made it to the end of his article I would say that it takes a bit more than a few words to offend.
Thank you for the kudos, ma'am.
I look forward to the coming pieces ... I suspect that they will turn out to my own satisfaction based upon all that I have read so far today ...
Aaron, I have a poorer memory than I would prefer, but your name and icon look familiar ... I hope we have not had a falling out in the past ... I guess time may tell ... :-)
Thank you for your comment! And I'm sure that we've never had a falling out as that's all tedious to a person like me.
Sichen ... interesting you mentioned that author, but I don't go as deep. I strategically plant the idea and stress an investigation on the reading party to seek the truth for themselves as I have.
Again, thank you for the words.