No one can say I am being biased since I am just copy and pasting HIS words.
When the Illinois version of the Born Alive Infant act first came to the Illinois Senate floor in 2001, Obama spoke against it, after engaging in a colloquy with its sponsor, Sen. Patrick O'Malley.
"I do want to just make sure everybody in the Senate knows what this bill is about, as I understand it," Obama said. "Senator O'Malley, the testimony during the committee indicated that one of the key concerns was -- is that there was a method of abortion, where the -- the fetus or child, as -- as some might describe it, is still temporarily alive outside the womb. And one of the concerns that came out in the testimony was the fact they were not being properly cared for during this brief period of time that they were still living. Is that correct?"
Obama went on to question whether the law would pass constitutional muster if the "child ... temporarily alive outside the womb" was called a "person."
"Number one, whenever we define a pre-viable fetus as a person that is protected by the Equal Protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we're really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a--a child, a nine-month-old child that was delivered to term. That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place."
"As I understand it, this puts the burden on the attending physician who has determined, since they were performing this procedure, that, in fact, this is a nonviable fetus; that if that fetus, or child -- however way you want to describe it -- is now outside the mother's womb and the doctor continues to think that it's nonviable but there's, let's say, movement or some indication that, in fact, they're not just coming out limp and dead, that, in fact, they would then have to call a second physician to monitor and check off and make sure that this is not a live child that could be saved."
Me:
Obama voting record on this issue is "present" and 2 "no's"


Comments: 22
How DAMNED "cavalier" of him, where a LIVING CHILD is concerned...
I will now excuse myself...to go somewhere quiet and REGURGITATE...
“I would have voted for the Born Alive Infant Protection Act in Illinois had it been worded the same as the federal bill. I think that’s the position the Democrats should take.”
I might add I personally think its wonderful that so many "men" seem to feel its important that they get the word out and also have the power to tell a woman what "her" choice should be....
- just a little irony with that comment and I mean every word.
Name and date of testimony: “Testimony of abortion survivor Gianna Jessen before the Constitution Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee on April 22, 1996.
“I've been doing a lot of radio interviews the last couple of weeks about Barack Obama's opposition to Born Alive, sometimes four a day.
(To the right is a photo of Mancow and me when I interviewed in his studio Tuesday.)
Below is a clip from C-SPAN September 2 where a caller described hearing me on the radio (he got the facts mostly right) and asked MN Gov. Tim Pawlenty why the GOP isn't making a bigger deal if it is indeed true that Barack Obama voted against a bill to stop abortion survivors from being left to die....
It is indeed true, of course.”
http://www.jillstanek.com/
The woman in the video. Her website is listed above.
Anything like those that are damned intent on preventing all abortion, but wouldn't want to pay a dime to support the children, and could care less about them once they are born. They make great cannon fodder for illegal wars, though.
These are Children we're talking about, not the kind of scum that sits in your computer chair every day, you pile of garbage...
The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act was a law passed by the United States Congress in 2002. It extended legal protection to an infant born alive after a failed attempt at induced abortion.
Identified as Public Law 107-207, it was signed into law August 5, 2002 by President Bush,[1] and was based on HR 2175 (passed March 12). The Senate counterpart, initiated by Sen. Rick Santorum, passed without amendment by unanimous consent July 18[2].
The original author of the bill, Congressman Charles T. Canady of Florida, had by then retired from Congress.[3]
But Obama chose to turn his back and wait years for a federal law.
Obama knew damned well, and there was very little difference between the wording of the Illnois Bill and the Federal Bill, at least none that would have made that much difference. Even Obama's own words showed that during his speech during the prevote.
Anything to protect that Communist bastard.
Charles T. Canady - Republican politician and jurist from Florida. He was a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1993 to 2001, was a judge on the Florida Court of Appeals for the Second District from 2002 to 2008 and is now an associate justice on the Florida Supreme Court, taking seat in 2008.
Can we abort the father as well, he was part of it too.