If you go to their site you will find great information about universal medicine.
PLEASE GO TO WWW.SICKOCURE.ORG TO SIGN THE PETITION FOR HR676
Physicians for a National Health Program
29 E Madison Suite 602, Chicago, IL 60602
Phone (312) 782-6006 | Fax: (312) 782-6007 | email: info@pnhp.org
© PNHP 2006
Privacy Policy ¤ Find us on a map
9 Steps to Comprehensive Quality Health Care in America
1) Shut down the private health insurance corporations.
2) Enroll all Americans (including Veterans) and the 40 million uninsured citizens into the Medicare Health Insurance Corporation. Since the current functioning Medicare Insurance Company is already accepted by almost all physicians, Hospitals and clinics in the Country, hardly any infrastructure investments on the health care delivery end will be necessary. Have all private businesses pay a Medicare premium for their employees instead of private health insurance premiums. Let employees as well as businesses contribute a fixed premium amount based on their age up until 65 for their Medicare services and drugs. Freeze current premiums for all Americans over 65 and adjust in the future according to the cost of living index. These premiums paid by businesses to Medicare for their employees should be less than that paid to current private insurance companies because of the lower overhead costs of the Medicare Corporation.
3) Hire the now unemployed former private health insurance corporate bureaucrats to actually deliver and not inhibit health care by working in hospitals, doctors' offices, clinics and nursing homes around our Country. Demographically, the percentage of elderly Americans is rapidly increasing. With every American now insured through Universal Medicare Insurance, real health care workers will be in desperate need. For the first time in the brief but bloody history of managed care, these former private insurance corporation employees will actually touch and improve care for patients by working in physical therapy, nursing, home health care and other ancillary patient care capacities.
4) Obtain by eminent domain (for the public good) the best of the intellectual property protected computer codes which the closed private insurance businesses previously used to monitor patient care and doctors utilization and performance. Private health insurance companies have used these computer programs exclusively for the purpose of strong-arming their contracted health care providers into doing less for their patients and increasing the premium costs for sicker patients in order to achieve higher corporate profits. Medicare on the other hand can use these same computer programs for the common good; to monitor, collect data and eventually improve the efficacy of diagnoses and the treatment of diseases and medical outcomes every time a doctor submits a bill. For example, wouldn't it be nice to know as a medical consumer (patient) which oncology groups in Boston, New York or Houston have the highest cure rates for stage III breast cancer or Stage II prostate cancer? All those numbers currently exist in cancer registries nation wide and just need to be collected and honestly disseminated. Currently, instead of solid medical data which delineates morbidity and mortality and performance, the medical consumer when choosing an oncologist must rely on word of mouth, physician referrals or advertisements in the local papers which show photographs of smiling doctors in white coats who claim to be the 'best' doctors in town. In addition to garnering invaluable instantaneous epidemiologic data on diagnoses and treatment of diseases based on severity and other variables, a strong Medicare based utilization review computer code would also allow Medicare to monitor doctors and hospitals who abuse a fee-for-service billing system. Any physician, institution or service found to abuse the Medicare fee for service billing system after proper review and appeal should be dealt with severely through stiff penalties and loss of their Universal Medicare provider contract.
5) Freeze Medicare physician, hospital and ancillary services reimbursements at current 2007-2008 levels. Adjust reimbursements for future services yearly by Cost of Living increases, or in the event of a deflationary economy a decreases in doctor and hospital payments. Ask any physician and they'll tell you they would accept current reimbursement rates with COLA over the current mysterious illogical fee adjustment system of Medicare, or the physician population density reimbursement formula used by most private insurance corporations. Two tiered medical systems separating the “haves and have not's†of society have and will always exist. Therefore, we must allow physicians to practice medicine without enrolling in or accepting the Universal Medicare reimbursement. With private medical insurance no longer available, and no performance based evidence for improved morbidity and mortality among their private for-pay patients, these extraordinarily expensive private 'VIP' practices will be limited.
6) Allow Medicare, much like the current Veterans Administration System and every private health insurance company and government health care system around the world, to bid on medications from pharmaceutical corporations for its Medicare drug formulary. Every physician recognizes that we don't need a choice of a dozen redundant drugs in each pharmaceutical category. For example, we need only 2-3 statins for cholesterol, a handful of antibiotics for infections, 2 beta blockers for hypertension, and a few pain killers. Once the Government bids on pharmaceuticals for the Medicare Corporation formulary, macro economics will force prices to massively decrease to levels identical to that which all the other people of the world outside of America are paying for the same medicines. Since it has not effectively decreased morbidity or mortality in this Country, and only wastes money, we should also prohibit pharmaceutical companies and their workers from contributing to political campaigns or buying commercials on the public airways. We need to also prohibit the current practice whereby your local pharmacy and pharmacist sells your private medical diagnoses and your doctors private prescribing drug information to pharmaceutical companies so the pharmaceutical companies in-turn can directly pressure-market physicians. Prohibit pharmaceutical companies from contributing to organized medicine societies, colleges or associations because the doctors can't rely on soft bribes or free lunches to prescribe what's best for their patients. Prevent pharmaceutical representatives from visiting doctors' offices or hospital pharmacies directly. Allow delivery of Medicare formulary approved sample medications for patients to physicians' offices via post office mail only. Allow pharmaceutical companies to market products to physicians only via peer reviewed publications delivered by email or snail mail.
7) With the savings incurred from closing the private insurance corporations and paying less for drugs, have the American government fully fund the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) programs. Emphasis should be placed on basic bench research carried out at not-for-profit American Institutions which employ or utilize a majority of American Citizens in their laboratories and clinics. Too often American Universities rely on free overseas labor to conduct bench research. Clinical trials should emphasize new drugs and devices which have promise to significantly decrease morbidity and mortality for any disease, including orphan diseases. Since a large percentage of private funding for drug and device studies will originate in the expanding financial liquidity and innovations and patients of the emerging developing world, we should allow the FDA to utilize research data obtained by reproduced laboratory and clinical studies performed overseas as well as in this Country.
Corruption of honest academics should be curtailed. Force all investigators to release reproduced publicly funded scientific data for all scientists to review on the internet via the Freedom of Information act (The Senator Shelby Amendment). Prohibit rights of first refusal on scientific data for private companies performing research in non-for profit institutions which receive public funding. Any rights to profits obtained from intellectual property and patents invented with combined funding from government and private sources should be split fairly among the contributing government institutions and any other private corporations funding the research, as well as with the individual inventor. Prevent organized medicine societies, associations or colleges from contributing to political campaigns since campaign donations have no relevance for physician performance or patient morbidity or mortality.
8) Offer physicians the same legal protection from malpractice lawsuits which have been established for commercial health insurance corporations during the last 3 decades.
9) The quality of current medical records software lags two decades behind business software. Therefore, we need to fund and challenge America's best software corporations to finally develop standardized electronic medical records software for use in doctors' offices and hospitals in order to increase the efficiency and productivity of physician charting, billing and prescribing. We should use the integrated medical records system to instantaneously and confidentially gather important epidemiologic data on physicians' performance, patient diseases, and treatments. With new potent viruses and unsophisticated biomedical and nuclear warfare on the horizon, this system will be absolutely necessary for rapid National Security responses. Protect patient confidentiality at all costs to prevent the commercialization and abuse of patient data like that which the pharmacies trade today.
Lastly, some argue that Universal Government run health care in America will result in delays in diagnosis and treatment similar to those experienced in Britain and Canada. One can not simply compare the massive extremely functional Medicare insurance corporation based infrastructure which seamlessly delivers health care to tens of millions of people yearly in the USA to the government run westernized health care systems of Canada and Britain, France, Switzerland, Netherlands, Scandinavia, and Israel. America, for the last 40 years, thanks to the government run health insurance corporation-Medicare, has built an incredibly dense and fluid public insurance system involving almost all doctors' offices, hospitals, clinics and ancillary services. The Medicare system dwarfs in breadth and actual practitioners and efficacy the lesser insurance systems established in all other countries. The billing and reimbursement bureaucracy for health care providers contracted with Medicare Insurance is already relatively streamlined and efficiently centralized in America thanks to 40 years of physician, hospitals and government cooperation.
We all know that the medically bankrupt private health insurance corporations and medical malpractice lawsuit threats have caused many disheartened physicians to quit practicing or downsize their practices in America. A continuation and technological upgrading of our most fair Universal Medicare based health insurance Corporation based on the concepts outlined above would undoubtedly motivate those disenfranchised physicians to return to the profession and bright younger physicians to invigorate the field. If patients, physicians and the Medicare Corporation continue to work together, without the deleterious interference of private for-profit health insurance corporations, malpractice threats and overt pharmaceutical marketing, the future for American health care will be healthy indeed.. A continuation of the status-quo mixture of a government subsidized private health maintenance insurance industry operating parallel to and within Medicare is wasteful, and will continue to provide no potential future health improvements for America.


Comments: 64
You have shared some great info here.
Thanks for the comments at the article about my husband.
will check it out.
brainfart
I am all for Universal Health Insurance but I have to point out that in recent years, with the Republican gutting of the Medicare program a lot of Physicians no longer accept Medicare patients.
I am an RN who works in Home Health and I am very familiar with Medicare and I agree that it was a good system but between the Providers who were scamming the system and the Republican mandate to cut back on Medicare
spending the benefits are rapidly shrinking.
The current Administration is going to have to go through the HICFA manual page by page and tighten up the loop holes and remove those rules designed to strangle or financially cripple those areas that work.
Medicare rule changes came down even in the last month of 2008 that are creating more problems for honest providers and mandating an oversight of Home Health by companies who are commissioned in such a way that their primary income is based on how much money they save the system by DENYING payment to Health care providers. The sector that is most affected by that particular rule was notified December 15th, 2008. The rule took effect December 1st, 2008.
. Medicare on the other hand can use these same computer programs for the common good; to monitor, collect data and eventually improve the efficacy of diagnoses and the treatment of diseases and medical outcomes every time a doctor submits a bill. For example, wouldn't it be nice to know as a medical consumer (patient) which oncology groups in Boston, New York or Houston have the highest cure rates for stage III breast cancer or Stage II prostate cancer?
Medicare is already attempting to do this. So far if you go to The Medicare Website you will find links to "Home Health Compare" or "Nursing Home Compare". Both of which take data compiled by monitoring outcomes (at least for the Home Health segment) and puts certain parts of that data into fairly easy to read categories by which they compare the facility/agency against both State averages and National averages.
I think they are working on doing the same for Physicians and Hospitals but it is a long and involved process.
There is a lot of good information here. As a footnote I am intimately familiar with the Canadian health care system as I trained and worked in Canada before moving south to escape winter. I am currently dealing with the Canadian health care system relative to my Father's recent hospitalization and have to add that for all the flaws Non Canadians are quick to point out it also has a lot of very good points. My Dad will most likely end up staying in the hospital for a couple of weeks while they look for an appropriate care setting to move him to as there is no way my Mom could manage him anymore at home.
If he were here they would have sent him home after his second or third day in the hospital for her to try and manage on her own even though she is almost as frail as he is.
the website is Medicare.gov
I don't know how people do the emotacons..
Would you please consider sending this, (after paring it down to 5000 characters) to whitehouse.gov. The link to send it is: http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/opl/
Then, I would send the entire thing via snail mail to Bobby Jindal's address.
Bobby Jindal, the House's Exec Director on the BiPartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare.
Elizabeth, this was a great, logical and loving read.
It really is ideas such as this that can make good things happen for the people.
Thank you for this.
Blessed be,
Wilka
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/President-Obama-Selects-Top-Rural-Health-Care-Advocate-to-Oversee-Key-HHS-Agency/
W
We need to quit treating medicine like a competetive business. That's the wrong model. It's an essential service, and our model is makin' people DEAD in this country.
Go up-thread and find the link, and SIGN THAT PETITION!!!
Pass on the website!
Secondly, it says that Medicare/Medicaid is already accepted by a majority of doctors and hospitals. Hospitals, yes. But not doctors. I've ran across many doctors who did not accept it when I lived near my parents and had to help them with their medical issues. Here in Cincinnati, the best doctors for fibromyalgia don't even accept insurance, let alone Medicare or Medicaid.
Health care costs in the US have skyrocketed, due largely to malpractice suits. Catholic hospitals, which traditionally provided care to indigent patients, are closing. They were staffed by nurses who were nuns. They worked for almost nothing but room and board. Now there are very few nuns and very few of them are nurses.
No matter what the reasons for the current health care crisis, there is no reason why we cannot have national health care for all. The employees who will lose jobs at the insurance companies would probably be the best qualified to staff the national plan, so we don't need to consider an unemployment increase when the companies close.
As for the insurance employees, I totally agree. There is no reason why they can't be "repurposed" to work with a single payer system.
Healthcare is a RIGHT not a PRIVELEGE.
My experience has been that while it is not hard to find physicians to treat uninsured patients without a fee, finding a hospital to accept them is very difficult. Federal Hill-Burton funds are generally used up during the first half of the year. Hospitals do write off millions of dollars' worth of care every year, but we really do need health care for all Americans.
Whatever the plan chosen, every legislator and the president need to be covered by it and receive exactly the same care as every other American. When they know they will be designing a plan for themselves and their families, they'll have an incentive to build a better plan.
You should check out two of my other posts: A Tribute to My Grandmother and My Sister's Story
I agree, the federal employees should have the same healthcare as the rest of the country. I think that people should be made aware of what the federal government employees healthcare is really like, and that we all PAY for it.
The actual payout to the plaintiff in a malpractice suit is only a small part of the cost. The attorneys need to be paid and the hospitals spend a lot of money trying to prevent suits as well as defending themselves in suits.
Fear of malpractice has caused doctors to overutilize. They will order more tests in order to protect themselves, which kicks up the costs. Every hospital employee who does patient care must have malpractice insurance. A newly-graduated doctor's malpractice insurance costs about $100,000 for the first year and goes up when suits are brought against him/her.
There are varying opinions about malpractice claims under national health care. While it would keep costs down, patients would have no recourse for substandard care amd negligence.
MySpace Comments at GlitterBell.com
Easter Comments</center>
glitter-graphics.com
Thanks for this very informative post!
regards
muscle building supplements
Bodybuilding forum