For those who are continuing to be concerned about the citizenship issue of Barack Obama, this is a good piece of information.
The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions,
they must have answers
It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple
one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A : Yes, by his own admission.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible.
Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in
1981.
**** I know it could be that he traveled to another country and then to Pakistan or used some other method to visit Pakistan. i.e. People travel to Cuba a lot, yet Cuba is on the no travel list..
What does that prove? Well for one thing it proves he is less than honest but we already knew that.
If he traveled with a passport other than one from the US it means he claimed citizenship in another country. Therefore he is not a Natural Born Citizen. In fact since he has never been naturalized he must not even be an American.
One thing I would like to know. Why did he travel to Pakistan anyway? He was supposed to be in school at that time, not traveling all over the world. He is supposed to have come from a family of modest means. Where did he get the money to make a world tour?
The Birthers are looking for the wrong document. They should be looking for his passport or the application for one.
I’m not saying he is not a citizen or not qualified or even a pretender. I am saying the questions about him should be answered and answered quickly.


Comments: 87
I was unaware that President Obama's citizenship was in question. I thought the issue (for some) was whether he was born a citizen of the United States. These are two different questions.
The possibility that he is a dual citizen also exists, as his father was not American but British.
I hope the courts pick this issue up fast- as we have seen over the past year there will be no cooperation from the Obama camp.
On another note, this is more of a question that I will research a bit, the US policy on dual nationality is not clear to me as it relates to natural born. The status of "natural born" is aquired at birh. One of your parents is a US citizen adult and/or you are born here, and voila, you are a natural born citizen. What happens when you apply for and receive another passport from another country. You don't lose your US citizenship, that I know for sure.
A U.S. citizen may acquire foreign citizenship by marriage, or a person naturalized as a U.S. citizen may not lose the citizenship of the country of birth.U.S. law does not mention dual nationality or require a person to choose one citizenship or another.</</em>strong>
The above quote is copied directly from the state department site: http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1753.html
However, dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country. They are required to obey the laws of both countries."
Bottom line, the law did not account for all of this. I am familiar with this because my parents are from Greece and I could go get a Greek passport any time I want to.
That's settled. Feel better?
Apparently, he could have renewed that in '82, but chose not to, making him an American Naturalized citizen, also making his passport in '81, British. You can check all of this on FactCheck. That's where I found it.
I also happen to agree that this ought not to be such a huge secret.
Marilyn
If you will read the article closely on factcheck, you will see that what is posted is a copy of a copy that has been altered with sections vital to identification blacked out.
Tests have shown this to be a forgery. That is beyond question.
The state of Hawaii has verfied his birth certificate not once but twice.
The SCOTUS which is mostly Republican hasnt asked to hear the case...in fact it has been thrown out in lower courts...why you might ask? Because they think its ridiculous also.
I find it funny that you are so willing to disregard state officials but anyone can post some phony as all get out Kenya BC and you jump on it as the truth. And do you even KNOW what a Kenyan BC looks like? Have you ever seen one? I havent.
Then you have nutcases like Clifford N. He apparently KNOWS more than anyone. Obvious forgery???????? Where the hell do you people get this nonsense?
No the lower courts have said the plaintif did not show they were affected. The lower Courts do not have Jurisdiction anyway now. Only SCOTUS has jurisdiction acording to the Constitution.
I did not say a I thought it was the truth at all. In fact I said I thught the thing was settled Lori. The one Fact Check has is the one that was altered. The fact that Hawaii authinticated their document is what is significant. I don't know why certian parts of that first one were blacked out. There had to be a reason but only Obama knows what that reason might be.
To keep the Birthers stirred up and make the Republicans look like fools? Who sent that Kenyan BC to the attorney? Someone who wants to keep the contraversy alive? For what reason? Pretend to be a Republican to keep them looking foolish?
Can you tell I don't trust Professional Politicians?
Obama is black, smart and more successful than people like Clifford will ever be. Obama is YOUR president and mine. The majority of people in the US elected him. YOU LOST....Get over IT.
"HALF BLACK!!!" says the white duck........
No he is being acused of having Dual Citizenship more than anything else Jeff.
Have you looked that up, about the no travel list Chuck?
Be careful your true colors are showing.
Shakesphere got his family name because one of his ancesters was a sholdier in the Army. He used to stand in front of the line of men and shake his spear at the enemy. Thus he aquired the name.
Now the people are mad as hell...
My advice to you would be to write an auto biography, in fact a serious of them, and you'll get that Lifetime movie. I'd be the first in line to hear the rest of your story.
No it wasn't. This is just a bunch of birther BS without a shred of evidence to support it. This myth has been busted here.
During the Bush years, we had the liberal "draft-dodgers" backing up Dan Rather's lies (debunked by Rather's firing). Oh, and the "no-nukers" claiming "Bush lied people died" about the Iraq nukes (debunked by a majority of foreign intelligence services.
Conservatives didn't feel it necessary to label their opponents, but I guess labeling is just part of your propaganda campaign.
I liked it better when we were able to discuss issues without name calling, but I guess those days are gone forever.
Randy, Will is trying to be the ultimate Troll. He loves to argue anything and he can't speak without some kind of "label". Usually I just ignore his rants.
Surely you can't be serious.
"I liked it better when we were able to discuss issues without name calling, but I guess those days are gone forever."
Uh-huh. This from a guy whose Gather status line calls the President of the United States "The Quintessential Liberal Fascist"? Get real, Randy.
I read the comments, George, and I didn't see any comment from you acknowledging that the Birther accusation regarding the trip to Pakistan was obvious BS. The last relevant comment from you that I read said "I don't know what the rules were in 1981."
The really sad part is that I honestly don't think you see the hypocrisy.
Surely you can't be serious. (Darn you, Wil, for dragging me in here.)
Unfreakingbelievable. Are these people really this ignorant, or are they trying to see how much bigger the lies can get?
Neither one of you have read the article. I can tell by your comments.
I'll repeat it then
" Col. George W. Aug 8, 2009, 12:26pm EDT
I looked it up for you buddy. You are right. The rules essentually say you are nuts if you want to travel in a long list of countries. I don't know what the rules were in 1981"
convieniant of you to leave out the first sentence.
What the rules are now is totally irrelevant, with regards to the Birther's accusation. You said you didn't know what the rules were in 1981. I included a link to information, and evidence to back up that information, explaining what the rules were in 1981.
To me this issue is a waste of time although I don't agree with Obama on 70% of the issues. However I would like to see this "natural born" as it relates to the presidency be clarified because we have people of different backgrounds being born in different lands more often than not.
"...a new opinion poll released last week finds that the belief that the president is not a native-born U.S. citizen is largely confined to conservative whites -- the Republican Party's core voter base -- and most heavily concentrated in the South."
the issue is MOTIVATION.
do you *REALLY* think that half of these nonsense theorys would be fielded if someone with the same views, ideas, ect, who was white as mccain would have won?
not a chance.
Why did he travel to Pakistan anyway?
He is supposed to have come from a family of modest means.
He was supposed to be in school at that time, not traveling all over the world.
the DNC//ACORN (and those who have stolen money from the organization)///and Nancy Pelosi.......
Heck Bill Clinton too........he spent more time in Texas getting Dems elected and in the Soviet Union than in college......lets talk about these very expensive pass/fail schools where you need not go to school to get a degree.....
¿ and there's proof Obama went to scholl now????, last I seen there is no real proof of this either.....