A weekly column
Cap and Trade Will Lead to Capital Flight
In my last column, I joked that with public spending out of control and the piling on of the international bailout bill, economic collapse seems to be the goal of Congress. It is getting harder to joke about such a thing however, as the non-partisan General Accounting Office (GAO) has estimated that the administration's health care plan would actually cost over a trillion dollars. This reality check may have given us a temporary reprieve on this particular disastrous policy, however an equally disastrous energy policy reared its ugly head on Capitol Hill last week.
The Cap and Trade Bill HR 2454 was voted on last Friday. Proponents claim this bill will help the environment, but what it really does is put another nail in the economy's coffin. The idea is to establish a national level of carbon dioxide emissions, and sell pollution permits to industry as the Catholic Church used to sell indulgences to sinners. HR 2454 also gives federal bureaucrats new power to regulate a wide variety of household appliances, such as light bulbs and refrigerators, and further distorts the market by providing more of your tax money to auto companies.
The administration has pointed to Spain as a shining example of this type of progressive energy policy. Spain has been massively diverting capital from the private sector into politically favored environmental projects for the better part of a decade, and many in Washington apparently like what they see. However, under no circumstances should anyone serious about economic recovery emulate an economy that is now approaching 20 percent unemployment, where every green job created, eliminated 2.2 real jobs and cost around $800,000 each!
The real inconvenient truth is that the cost of government regulations, taxes, fees, red tape and bureaucracy is a considerable expense that has to be considered when companies decide where to do business and how many people they can afford to hire. Increasing governmental burden directly causes capital flight and job losses, as Spain has learned. In this global economy its easy enough for businesses to relocate to countries that are more politically friendly to economic growth. If our government continues to kick the economy while its down, it will be a long time before it gets back up. In fact, jobs are much more likely to go overseas, compounding our problems.
And for what? Contrary to claims repeated over and over, there is no consensus in the scientific community that global warming is getting worse or that it is manmade. In fact over 30,000 scientists signed a petition recently directly disputing the claims on which this policy is based. Legitimate environmental claims should instead be directed towards the public sector. The government, especially the military, is the most serious polluter in the country, and is exempt from most EPA regulations. Meanwhile Washington bureaucrats have classified the very air we exhale as a pollutant and have gone unchallenged in this incredible assertion. The logical consequence is that there will come a time when we will have to buy a government permit just to emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere from our own lungs!
The events on Capitol Hill last week just demonstrate Washington's audacity in manufacturing problems just so they can expand government power to solve them.
Posted by Ron Paul (06-29-2009, 01:04 PM) filed under Civil Liberties


Comments: 15
They want an annual tax on methane gas emitted by dairy cattle of $75. That should get rid of all those pesky small dairy farmers so the corporatists can take complete control.
Linda, You have Got to be joking. That is really out of left field.
Linda,
Please provide a link to where you heard this.
My brother-in-law and cousin are dairy farmers - they got the info.
Just the fact they TRIED to get this passed is off the wall!
More than off the way. It is assinane.
Linda, that is not just Dairy cattle, but all cattle.
This is so ridiculous, all this GW BS, and being used to screw the people.
Lisa, here arfe some links;
EPA livestock tax blocked by Tiahrt amendment
http://www.hpj.com/archives/2009/jun09/jun29/0619EPAlivestocktaxblockedT.cfm?title=EPA%20livestock%20tax%20blocked%20by%20Tiahrt%20amendment
Farmers say "livestock emission" tax stinks
http://www.ktiv.com/Global/story.asp?S=10591505
THE INFLUENCE GAME: Excuse me! Lobby wins on burps
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jAE3EVpP2CsGMHLeWNxpMO7cIXPAD98UR1IO1
Now the question is, Is there anything in that 1200+ piece to TP the House passed the other day about this?
thanks for the links Dan. I just had personal knowledge.
Col. - who the heck knows. They ALWAYS sneak through what they want. We just don't always know about it for some time. Just like NAIS was "mandatory" but they ALLOWED it to be voluntary UNTIL they demand it be mandatory. They have control, as always.
In a 1200 - 1500 page document they can hide a lot of things. I hope our Senators have a chance and do read that document. It would not have a change if they did.
Col. you know with Pelosi running the show, it will be done like she has had it done before, it will be pushed threough. With her controlling the White House as well, she has massed a lot of power now that Obama is in Office.
Do you wonder how she has done that. She is anything but an American. She is pure Democrat far left and that is her only loyalty.
Very true. I have been watching how Obama's "Bills" are ones she has written, and everything he is doing, is what she has talked about. It just proves my point that Obama is just her stooge, and she is actually running the show.
That Cap and Trade bill was not written by Palosi. She only endorced and pushed it. The bill was written by Obama and his friends in Chicago. Work started on it even before he ran for State Senator.