A weekly column
Strengthening or Weakening the Economy?
The economic situation continues to deteriorate this week as past and future bailouts were discussed on Capitol Hill. The debate was over the accountability of already disbursed TARP money, and on whether or not to release remaining funds. Banks that had already been bailed out before are looking for more money to fill the black holes that are their balance sheets, warning that they are simply too big to fail. However, whatever 'devastating' consequences these banks are dreaming up and pushing on Capitol Hill regarding their own collapse will be nothing compared to the collapse of our currency if we keep debasing it through these foolish bailouts. It should be that they are too big to bailout. The world will not come to an end without this or that bank. The most troubling thing to me is this rhetoric that only government can save the economy, and must act. This is so counter-productive.
We must ask ourselves what strengthens this country, and what weakens it.
Government is a monumental drag on this economy. Government at all levels currently absorbs about 35-40 percent of GDP, which is still not enough for its voracious appetite. While productivity is already overtaxed, the government routinely spends more than it takes in and makes up for the shortfall by constantly borrowing or debasing our dollars through inflation. It pains me to think of all the opportunities for productive economic growth we have given up simply because our government is super-sized instead of Constitution-sized. There are just a few constitutionally sanctioned activities for government to engage in, but it is so overstretched with unconstitutional encroachments that what it is legitimately supposed to do, it does very badly. And yet we are to believe the solution to our problems is to make government bigger. On the contrary, government makes our problems bigger. The central bank's meddling with monetary policy led to overheated lending, and now massive defaults. The government used manipulative tax policy to distort the housing market which has had many unintended consequences, and here we are. Government is quick to enact and slow to correct bad policy. Yet in spite of government's failures, it flourishes and grows, thanks to the continual bailouts from the unwitting taxpayer.
Big government has been tried and has failed miserably. What we need now is small government, and freedom. We need the freedom to pull ourselves up by our own bootstraps again, as we traditionally do in this country. But try to start a business or charity today, and you will understand how little economic freedom we really have left. Freedom, not government, made this the land of opportunity. Freedom laid the foundation that catapulted us to becoming the strongest economic power in the world. The American people are strong and capable. We can pull ourselves out of this mess. All we need is for the nanny-state to get out of the way and allow us to do it. Freedom is our strength, government is our weakness. Only by recognizing this and unleashing our strengths will we solve the problems we face today.
Posted by Ron Paul (01-19-2009, 12:28 PM) filed under Monetary Policy


Comments: 15
But despite all the evidence to the contrary, the majority of voters in this country prefer the excessive spending and control of the major parties. What does it matter if they don't want today, our grandchildren can bear the cost of a failed economy right?
It is very sad that most Americans have given up their right to think for themselves along with everything else they have given over to government.
The article is exactly correct. I have repeatedly written along the same thing but instead of folks taking time to check it out for themselves, one gets ridicule. Ron Paul is a free thinker and as such is rejected by government.
Washington does not want to hear anything that even hints as real change. Obama may want to change things but he will soon discover who he is up against if he really intends to reverse the trend toward greater government control. I am not at all sure he is not on the side of expansionism of the same old corruption. From where I sit, he has a lot of convincing to do before I believe he is any different.
it's too late though......
there is no way we are going to get smaller government for at least 4 years, and I have a feeling that it may go on for 4 more after that too......
anyone ready to immigrate to Mexico?, Central America?, South America........????
hahaha...............
I wish we could have elected a person would downsize government but the news and the political parties would not give Ron Paul the time of day.
I was really "praying" that Sara would inhereit the office....
but maybe she'll just have to run in 2012......
I really think she has the right "stuff" to do it right.......
Broke is Broke.
We could do away with a vast number of agencies in government and never know they were gone. When Clinton took office Al Gore did a study. He discovered an agency stationed in Mexico that was set up during the second ww to combat Nazi infiltrators. It was still operating. As far as I know nothing was done about it. It hit the papers for about two editions and was forgotten.
As you say Jody, Broke is Broke