What I Am in Truth
Is "Being Being Being"
Prior to conception.
[Note: Of course, "I" (though Pure Being at Heart) can also Be "Being Being Ignorant of Itself as Such"; or, for that matter, "Being Being Anything Else" one might care to imagine. Though it should be noted that "Being Being anything other than Pure Being" is necessarily subject to the temporal limits of relative thought, sense and feeling, as well as varying degrees of Self-ignorance.]
© 2008 RFHay
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 11
Yes, although my Faith in Pure Being (in and of Itself, which would be the Ideal) is, as yet, not fully self-evident (which itself implies Pure Selflessness), an innate Faith in the Ultimate Validity of Pure Intellect and/or Reason is a valid characterization, Stanley.
In this regard, I would suggest that Pure Faith in Being has both a Thought (Head) and Feeling (Heart) component, much in the same way that a coin includes both a head and tail, which are both integral to the Essential Wholeness of the Coin.
In other words, I don't believe we have to "check the intellect at the door," at least not until it flown to very threshold of Pure Being (almost as a "Moth to the Flame," to be extingushed in Pure Live, Light and Love).
Thank you for posting to ~::Photographic Edge::~