I live in Ohio. We do not have casinos here. Casinos have been put on the ballot here three out of the last four years (including this year).
This particular ballot issue would allow ONE COMPANY to come in and build 4 casinos in Ohio cities - Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati and Toledo.
The pro-casino people talk about how wonderful it will be for the economy, how it will bring 34,000 new jobs to Ohio, etc. Many people say that if people are going to gamble anyway, they may as well do it in Ohio and quit taking the money out of state.
The anti-casino people talk about how for every $1 brought in, $3 is spent on social services due to gambling addiction, etc. I'm sure the neighboring states' casino owners are only too happy to fund the anti-casino people's campaign, since Ohioans might stop going to those out-of-state casinos.
I'm still undecided on this issue.
If you have casino gambling in your state, do you believe that it has helped or hurt your state?
Why?


Comments: 19
I dont think it makes sense to let one company do it all, competition is what keeps companies honest. If they have a monopoly it isnt going to be good for the staff.
The pro-casino folks claim lots of the money will go to schools. Right. That's the same thing that every lottery says before they start and they don't explain that the money goes into the regular budget and still has to be allocated and approved for education. Nor do they explain how many people or how much money it costs to run a lottery or how much money, as you said, it costs in social service costs.
With lottery tickets, I've seen people who have next to nothing spend their last dollar to try to win.
Will it be the same with casinos?
I have a relative who spends over $15,000 per year at casinos. Sure there are some winnings, but in the end the family is out that much year after year. They couldn't contribute any money to their kids' college education. But they could have if they hadn't been gambling.
I'm hoping this fails again.
Gambling is just like any other vice; drinking, eating, etc. Too much of anything is bad. Shall we ban eating because there are thousands of obese people?
The firm that owns it made all kinds of promises of jobs and community projects it would support. Yes, we did get jobs. But low paying jobs for the most part. Not enough to support a family. They came in bought land for the Casino, bought a large apartment complex and the golf course with the country club. The state, city, and county bent over backwards to build infrastructure for the Casino. And the Casino promised a new club house. It hasn't happend after 3 or 4 years now. The apartments are almost half vacant because they won't do any maintenance. And they complain they aren't getting enough of a tax break from the county. Do the schools and other organizations get some money. You bet. That's why I call it black-mail money. Without it most everyone would wish the Casino was gone. Some local go to the Casino if there is good live entertainment, but go else where to gamble.
I lived about 5 miles from a casino for 8 years and visited that casino about a half a dozen times.
To me it was O.K. entertainment not much else, my wife likes the penny and nickle slots and they usually had pretty good live bands playing.
I'm not opposed to casinos, I think they should be allowed.
As for those who would OWN the casinos, they already own casinos in Pennsylvania and some other states. The people of Kansas are STILL waiting for their casinos to be built.
Regardless of how much the taxes would be on casino winnings, (one commercial says it would be one of the highest rates in the nation) the vast majority of the OHIO monies spent in the casinos will still be going OUT OF STATE.
As for gambling...I watched my former boss, a very successful attorney, lose everything - his practice, his wife, his family and his waterfront home - to this addiction. I'm the kind of person who weighs whether to buy a $1 lotto ticket once a year and I never visited a casino in my life. If it's not a sure thing, they're not getting my dollar!
I'm philosophically opposed to gambling and voted against it's introduction in AC when it was voted on in a state referendum in the 1970's. Despite having a number of family members that have worked "good" jobs in the casinos, I've only been to them two or three times over the years. You can see good shows there without gambling. As far as the gambling is concerned, it's easier and cheaper for me to just stand next to my toilet and flush my money than it is to drive to the casinos to do it.
Gambling is a tax on the poor. Organized as it is, gambling moves money from the lower-middle income people to the rich people, with the 'government' bellied up to the trough taking out fists full of money as it passes by.
I watch people buying lottery tickets every week, their hopes, dreams and aspirations hung on a couple of bucks.
The money the government redistributes to social problems in New Jersey does do some good. I'm not sure we get that much bang for our buck. I personally don't gamble. In all my life, the only things I've won was a ball cap at a company cook out this year and a plastic teddy bear at the Knoxs County Fair in Ohio some 45 years ago.