OK. Here comes another of my silly conspiracy theories ...
My 16 year old daughter wanted to see the movie "Superbad". This is the type of movie that is very popular with the younger bunch. I haven't seen it but, based on the ads and trailers I've seen, I'll wait until it's on cable, thank you.
The problem is that "R" rating. I guess it was impossible to tone the movie down just a little or even make a PG-13 version available so that the under-17 crowd to whom this movie (and so many other "R"-rated moves) is marketed can see it without their parents. It's not enough for me to go to the theater with my daughter and state (even sign an affidavit, for Pete's sake!) that she has my permission to see the movie. Nope. I'd also have to buy a ticket for myself -- and then sit through the whole movie because if I leave, she has to leave with me.
I can see the MPAA wanting the theaters to get a few extra bucks by making me buy a ticket, but why should I have to sit through a movie in which I have no interest? In this case, the theater lost out on two tickets -- one for her and one for her friend, because I refused to go. (And does any teenager want their father around while she and her friends are watching this movie?)
Now I understand that they're going to put an "R" rating on any film that shows someone smoking. At first it seemed like a good idea. You know, stop marketing cigarettes and cigars to kids and all that crap? Well now it seems just another scheme to sell extra tickets -- to parents who would otherwise trust their teenagers to watch a movie without supervision.


Comments: 17
Thing that is so funny is that a rated R movie is easy enough to order via Pay Per View, which lends some credence to your theory that the ratings are more motivated by selling theater tickets than in ostensibly 'protecting' our youth.
My kids, my business what they watch. Theaters have no business policing this. Ratings are a guideline, not a law.