Jefferson City, MO – Twelve flexible fuel vehicle (FFV) models will soon be available for purchase. DaimlerChrysler, Ford, General Motors, Mercedes Benz and Nissan have announced their model year 2007 E85 compatible vehicles.
“We are pleased to see the automobile manufacturers follow through with their promise to increase their number of FFV offerings,” stated Phil Lampert, Executive Director of the National Ethanol Vehicle Coalition (NEVC). “This increase in production along with recent pledges for additional new vehicles, demonstrates the commitment of the auto industry to respond to consumer demands for E85 vehicles.”
Along with the continuation of many 2006 models, the automobile manufacturers will offer the following new FFVs in 2007:
DaimlerChrysler:
4.7 liter Chrysler Aspen
4.7 liter Jeep Commander
4.7 liter Jeep Grand Cherokee
4.7 liter Dodge Dakota
General Motors:
5.3 liter Chevy Express
5.3 liter GMC Savana
3.9 liter Chevy Uplander
3.9 liter Pontiac Montana
3.9 liter Saturn Relay
3.9 liter Buick Terraza
Mercedes Benz
2.5 liter C230 sedan
Nissan
5.6 liter Armada
“We must now focus on increasing the infrastructure across the entire U.S. to help fuel these vehicles with 85 percent ethanol,” Lampert added. “We are continuing to work with the Congress to consider incentives that would advance alternative fuel systems and are hopeful that the Senate will continue to appropriate funds to assist us in this effort.”


Comments: 12
I think you need to perhaps consider how MUCH IMPACT you and your neighbors WOULD indeed have, if you consciously made an effort to buy domestic energy, not OPEC.
E85 won't be THE ANSWER to all our problems by any means...it will be ONE OF MANY ANSWERS to get US off OPEC fuels, reduce the economic dependence upon Persian Gulf countries and Venzuela.
If we had ZERO oil interests in the Gulf, imagine if our money wasn't going there to fund violence?
If we had ZERO oil interest in the Gulf, imagine how much LESS military presence we would require there to protect our legitimate national interests.
Biofuels such as E85 and Biodiesel, Biomass and other non-fossil fuel sources will mean a MINIMUM of 20% reduction in foreign need over the next ten years.
- Better for the environment
- Better for our US economy
- Better to reduce military spending
- Better to fund FARMERS than HARMERS
It just seems to me that a government that is concerned about oil money going to foreign countries that could be snared for terrorism would think outside the box and divorce themselves from the oil lobby and oil corporation and oil money and push for a switch to an truly alternative fuel source and provide incentives to companies that develop such new technologies.
In the mean time, it would be nice if Congress would help stack the deck in favor of our smaller farmers so to keep them profitable. I still would rather see farms producing high quality and safe food within this country rather than having our farmers make fuel and food suppliers provide ingredients obtained from China.
Perhaps the information I have obtained is not accurate, but it is unsettling if true.
As a last point, I've always been astounded that US citizens would prefer to buy anything from overseas rather than from their own country, their own neighbors, their own citizens. Most likely fuel won't fall into that category.
As for corn, it is just one souce used to produce ethanol. The real surge will come when cellulous ethanol takes off in the next few years. It makes sense to begin converting the fleet now in anticipation of this trend.
Good points. I'm not 100% with ya on the "Petroleum Cowboy" thing, but I'm tracking with you.
You touched upon the #1 reason why our addiction to OPEC fuel will take years to shake: convenience.
That's why federal fleets (including military) and business are now the early adopters on this issue. As it becomes more convenient to buy alternatives over the coming years, consumers will complete the paradigm-shift.
That costs big money. Independent ma-and-pa operations don't have the funds to bring E85 or Hydrogen to your door.
Let's face it, we consumers want fuel spoon-fed to us, right down the block. Satisfying that intense desire, you'll find fueling stations (infrastructure) are already in place - for OPEC fuel.
Heck, there are three CITGO stations located within a few miles of my home. Even though my very soul knows not to buy there, and I've sworn off Chavezuela from my debtor list, my Mini-me devilish craving for convenience says "but it's right heeeerrre, so closssssse John; stopppppp, stoppppp."
So, to counter the craving, I satisfy it in a most rewarding way. I turn in the next drive and grab a Wendy's Frosty at the drive-up window. Ahhhhh....so cool, so refreshing. It's not long till the hankerin' for Hugoil goes away. Then, I continue on to the right station. Phew, hypocrite-ic disaster avoided - for just ninety-nice cents US.
I'm tellin' ya, it works. I recommend purchasing stock in Wendy's as the alternative fuel paradigm shift continues. You'll thank me for that tip later.
;)
John do a little research on how much Our President has made from the Petroleum industry since he first took office and see how much he has made as the President of the United States and you will find where his intrests lye. Just my opinion but I was taugh that money talks and BS Walks. We need to find an alternative fuel source and tell the Middle East to take a flying leap.
But we're all imperfect humans. By the way, President Bush HAS been pushing hydrogen quite heavily. He is very optimistic of hydrogen-fueled vehicles being a realistic, attainable goal in the near future.
Don't let his support for hydrogen become a reason for you to lose your passion for it though, OK?
Love your points on hydrogen. Please inform us more on those points - perhaps publish some articles, and feel free to post on www.biofuel.gather.com? This is why I'm writing on here, to get us all well-informed, so we can ACT.
You were taught right. Money talks and BS walks.
So, let's figure out ways for folks to profit from or SAVE from hydrogen.
- Let's figure out how we can DEMOCRATIZE energy itself. Produce energy at home, and sell it back to the electric companies? The "Electronet" is the term being used to describe that phenomenon. I love it.
My Father worked at a plant in Detroit Michigan called Carboloy. They made man made industrial diamonds using furnaces and giganic presses. They used Hydrogen in there furnaces that was produced on site at the company since 1960. It realy makes me crazy that we are still using petroleum to propel our cars and heat our houses. I will go to the Bio Fuel site and check it out. The thing is that most of the information I have is from books that have been produced by our government (US Department of Energy, Office of fossil energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory.
Awesome. Maybe two hacks can change the world (just a little).
SO, they were making Hydrogen, in 1960.
There's a great site for biofuel & renewable resources - Colorado's National Renewable Energy Lab (Golden, CO).
Link for you: http://www.nrel.gov/
It is especially sad that even with GLobal Warming being a VERY real deal, the people in office still care more about their bottom line than about the overall state of the world we live in. I realize that the shift from oil will not be easy & it will probably cost more (at least in the beginning)...but it is worth it by far! I want my children to have planet Earth to call home...