I personally don't believe Obama is racist. I more fear his being ultra liberal. I also fear is lack of historical perspective (knowledge) concerning foreign affairs. Racist is the least of my fears regarding Obama's candidacy.
If he were racist; how would it matter? I am sure we have had racist presidents before. None, I guess are outright bigots, but probably closet racists just the same. Maybe even in the current administration?
Someone said to me, what's good for the goose is good for the gander? He was referring to what I considered some double standards applied toward what Reverend Wright said and what was said by ministers that endorsed McCain. I don't agree with this; for one thing prejudice and racism is not good for the goose or the gander. Double standards also are not good for either.
So, will it matter if Obama is racist?
What would define Obama as racist?
Does because he associated with Reverend Wright who associates with others seen as racist make him racist? Is Reverend Wright really racist or is he just simply a demagogue that plays on others fears and enjoyed his 15 minutes of fame?


Comments: 19
As far as Rev Wright, I have no idea ... and don't care (glad Obama gave him the heave-ho)
I can remember watching Montel, he had someone make a racist remark , they were black people who didnt like whites, he quickly pointed out, he was not going to tolerate this kind of talk, his mother was white. So he was part white as well as black... I didnt hear Obama defending anyone that was white, when Wright made his racist remarks....
His associates speak volumes about his character.
I do not necessarily agree that he is racist because of his associations.
The fact that he has white relatives does not mean he has the same white experience I have. And the fact that he looks more black does not mean he has the same black experience of someone born black in a predominantly black neighborhood. My guess is that Obama gets mixed messages from both races due to his mixed heritage.
I have a bit of a problem making that automatic judgement in these instances and also in the instance of Obama.
I may be concerned and suspect; because of what he may be being taught, but who of intellect totally accepts everything they taught to be gospel? Even at church we have to use discernment.
Sometimes, being around bigotry (or any other opposing view) simply strengthens your opposing opinion. I am proof of that.
I had an uncle that was one of the biggest bigots I know. We spent two or three weekend days a month around him and his family for years and I agree with Julie; when you realize they are ignorant in what they are spouting off; you often determine to go a different path.
I don't necessarily think Mel Gibson is anti-semitic. I think there are a lot of heat of the moment times which we may express our ignorance and prejudice. I don't think everyone that slips up is racist. I do think they are wrong in their thinking and to have this in their heart; but we all sin, we all have things in our heart and mind that we generally or wise not to share.
Have I ever told an off colored joke or said the N word in anger. Well, the N word is not a word in my vocabulary, so hey score one for me; whoppee. But I admit I have told off colored jokes in my lifetime; some using the N word. Most using the word Pollock or Blond.
Have you told a Blond Joke, Pollock Joke or Redneck Joke? Then maybe you are also a racist or misogynist too?
Richard is right - behavior and actions of the individual are more indicative of their positions than who they may be friends with or go to church with.
Do we have cause for concern with Obama - there are questions and who really completely knows another person, even the president.
In my opinion there are a lot of other concerns and fears I have about Obama; racism is probably at the bottom of the list. In fairness, McCain also has a list going of fears and concerns going also. I wouldn't want to marry either of them; hopefully they won't do the country too much harm in four years. Part of me thinks they may be better than the last crew.
Would he allow us to learn whether he is or not? Not if he's any kind of politician - and he appears to be slick as oiled grease.
Does it matter? Maybe. But not nearly as much as his ultra-liberal leanings. Obama makes Bill Clinton look like Ronald Reagan by comparison.
One thing I am somewhat surprised by is the media's lack of attention to the similarities with the election of 1976. Perhaps it's just because Obama & HClinton have been beating up on each other and it hasn't had time to settle yet. Time will tell. But I find the similarities very troubling:
1976 was two years removed from an unpopular war (Vietnam) that was still being fought in the court of public opinion. Ford was president by default, but Nixon was the elected president.
Nixon was a hated Republican who even divided his own party and was not personable in any way. Ford also divided his own party by pardoning Nixon almost immediately upon taking office.
Under Nixon the FBI performed illegal wiretaps. The Homeland Security team has given others this same fear, even though those affected for the most part have been non-Americans.
Deportation is a big issue. In 2008 it's primarily an economic question. In 1976 it was issues of perceived subversion, including the most famous deportation hearing - John Lennon, an outspoken critic of the Nixon administration and the Vietnam war.
Add to that double-digit inflation, lay-offs, American jobs being lost to Asian counterparts and a recession.
Sound familiar? Now it gets really interesting.
Out of nowhere comes a charismatic governor with little prior experience and little practical plan. All Jimmy Carter had going for him is that he was not Nixon, he was not Ford and he was not LBJ. In fact, that was the reason given for electing him. According to his campaign slogan, Carter was "A Leader, for a Change."
What happened? Jimmy Carter was elected, and things changed - for the worse. It took until Reagan's second term to overcome the "changes" that Carter offered. I remember it because I lived through 21% interest on mortgages; an inflation rate that jumped to over 13% while wages increased by negligible amounts - for those who were working and did not lose their jobs to overseas competitors. The unemployment did drop temporarily - but only because of the numerous jobs funded by public money in a 70's version of the New Deal and putting a backbreaking load on the American taxpayer. When those were not renewed, the rate roared back to 7%.
Note - while I tend to side with Republicans because I am conservative, I am not a Republican bigot. Many of the positive reforms put in place by President Reagan were undone by the first President Bush. It took Bill Clinton to lead America out of that darkness. How many Republicans will you hear talk abotu the good things Clinton did?
It's not like Carter was the stupid peanut farmer the media played him up to be. If anything, he was the opposite. He was a learned man - a nuclear physicist. But his presidency stands today as one of the worst presidents in our history. The Camp David summit where a peace accord between Israel and Egypt was signed, is the only thing that salvages his presidency.
But his legacy is eerily similar to Obama. Many have heard the old Santayana quote that those who do not recall the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them (paraphrased). To paraphrase another quote (Yogi Berra) we may be looking at deja vu all over again....