Memo to President-Elect Obama:
"Now it is folly to go against men who could not be kept under even if conquered, while failure would leave us in a very different position from that which we occupied before the enterprise."
Thucydides, VI, 11.
Wise words from the ancients, Mr. President-elect. I should expect with your education and curiosity of the world you would have read Thucydides at some point. If not, allow me to explain the context of this comment and how it pertains to your apparent plans for Afghanistan.
By the 16th year of the Peloponnesian War the Athenians had gained the upper hand against the Lacedaemonians. They were just then recovering from the plague and the raids by the Spartan soldiers of their fields and farms. They had a golden opportunity to end the war then and there. Alas, they chose to invade Sicily and it was their downfall. It broke the treasury, wrecked their navy and led to the dismantlement of the Athenian long walls. The Athenian empire dead on the shoals of Sicily and around the walls of Syracuse--a place their nation had no material interests in, a place strategically unimportant. All this because of hurbis--they chose to open a new front in a far away land and it ruined them.
Does any of this sound familiar? Sure, the analogy is not perfect, but history's lessons seldom are so cut and dried. But it is a similar state of affairs we find ourselves in Afghanistan. Except that we are not recovering economically, but sinking deeper into a desperate cycle of deflation. The time for 'fixing' Afghanistan, if ever there was one, has long since passed.
The time for pacifying Afghanistan was when the Taliban fled into the hills or went to ground after our 2001 invasion and conquest of the country. Two precious years were lost by your predecessor. Two years when the entire world could have been brought on board with us to help create a more moderate, stable nation--although one far from perfection. Perfection is not for us humans, it is the province of the gods.
That time was pissed away. But for a paltry $30billion we could have lifted Afghanistan out of its misery, restored hope, moderated it politics and broken the feudal warlords with the full force of the world behind us. And in its place a government for and by all the Afghans, Tajiks, Hazaras, Uzbeks, and Pashtuns. But we failed. Even worse: we didn't even try.
So, today we are faced with a nation riven by ethnic tensions and international rivalries. Iranians meddle in the West, Indians support the Northern Alliance, or what is left of it and Pakistan is enmeshed in a war of its own on the joint Afghan-Pakistan frontier.
The Petraeus template will not work in Afghanistan. Afghanistan cannot be won. All we can do is ameliorate the effects of the defeat, as we have done in Iraq--although that is still a dirty little secret the media won't report. But you sir, with your high level briefings and personal intelligence know the truth of the matter. And yet, you persist in the fantasy that Afghanistan can be won? How? We are a bankrupt nation, reeling from a housing, credit and general economic crisis the likes of which we have not seen in 70 years. How can a great power in this kind of shape, think Athens again but at the height of the plague, a nation that cannot even prevent piracy around the Horn Of Africa, expect to win a war 10,000 miles away? All this while trying to reform and rebuild at home? Just ask Lyndon Johnson how well that worked. Is this the legacy you want? Or would you prefer a Dr. Brydon moment?
The lesson of Afghanistan is clear: it is easy to conquer but impossible to hold.
Doubling down is not an option.


Comments: 41
It does all hinge on Barack's advisors, to a point, but he has the power of veto!
barackobama.gather.com
I think. If not, ask and I can find it.
I am a bit worried, but hopeful.
Featured in the Triple Name Club.
Thank you for sharing this. There is no win! I believe there also is no simple answers.
I hope Obama can summon the wisdom and find this elusive answer.
Let's HOPE so.
Sean, why are you traveling to Afghanistan? There's a war going on there, right now. Not a place to go adventureing into these days. I'd re-think this one, just as you've suggested to Obama.
I'm a grown man of 38. I am aware of the risks. I am an adult. I accept responsibility for my actions. It is my life to lead as I see fit.
And if I seem defensive about this, it is because I am. I tired of people telling what I should and shouldn't do. I spent the better part of my life listening to others tell me what to do and was miserable. I'd rather die doing what I love than go back to living miserably.
Or, in the immortal words of Pink Floyd, no more lives of quiet desperation for me. To hell with that.
God Bless You in wherever you choose to roam.. just hope to hear from you, during and after... well it would make great copy, wouldn't it?
And yet, to be fair to you, you ask a very good question, one no one has asked. It's always, oooooo, be careful, blah, blah, blah. But you asked the right question: "You never actually did say why you felt the burning need to get into the thick of things." It's also a very acceptable and reasonable question. And it is one I have been journaling about and thinking about the last several days. It is also one I will address and answer, perhaps to no one's satisfaction but my own, at some point in the near future.
Until then, well, my request stands: please folks, I don't want to hear about how dangerous it is and all that. I am aware. I do know. I am a grown man. And there is still a good chance I may not even get to go.
Petraeus agrees with you. What worked in Iraq will not work in Afghanistan. They have a less developed infrastructure. However, Petraeus is studying the situation. Petraeus employs a scholarly approach. He brings in many Afghanistan subject matter experts. Unlike Iraq the political will is w/ him. If anyone can turn around Afghanistan he can.
With the little knowledge I have of the situation there I would give gifts to most of the people, bow politely, and leave. Of course, if I knew more I might change my thinking on the matter.
You quite clearly have no idea of my timeline, haven't read any of my posts and are utterly unaware that I have been in South East Asia the last six months. If you need "proof" go to my Flickr pages and see the photos and the time stamps attached digitally to each one.
I don't object to you calling me a liar. I'm a big boy, but using terms such as BS artist, etc. . . are insults and they will be deleted.
If it ain't me, I want to know who the person photoshopping these photos is, because he or she is damn good!
Lastly, you are clearly not a traveler, have never been a traveler and know next to nothing about travel. For starters: an American does not need a visa to travel in Thailand, Malaysia or Singapore. And American can get a visa upon arrival in Indonesia and Laos. A visa must be gotten before hand for India--which I did in Bangkok a few weeks ago, and for Vietnam, which I did in Vientiane in Laos. About 60% of the countries on the planet are accessible to Americans without visas. Another 30% are relatively easy to procure and the other 10% are a pain, including Iran, which took my father and I six months to get.
So you have clearly proven you know absolutely nothing about travel. In the future, stick to subjects you know something about before typing. Might save you some embarrassment.
If I have learned anything in 15 years of travel and 44 countries, it is to plan well ahead for visas to avoid hassles. When you do that, everything falls in to place quite nicely.
And a guidebook usually helps people avoid the pitfalls. Barring that, I always use www.traveldocumentsystems.com when I am back home for the tough countries to get visas, like Russia, Iran and China.
Get out of the US and travel. Really, it will enrich your life beyond your wildest dreams!
Obama will gear this one up as both he/his party have said this part of the war was justified. Never mind it will be at least as expensive and again we will be largely alone in hoisting the burden.