I heard part of this debate on my local NPR station this afternoon, and can't wait to listen to the rest online. You can check it out, too - either the 50-minute edited version, or the 1hr, 50min. unedited version. GOOD STUFF! http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16337441
They poll the audience before and after the debate. The three panelists opposed to the proposition "It is time to end affirmative action" picked up 11%. The three in support picked up 5% more support.
(This article is part of "GATHER Discusses Tolerance", a group created last month, at nohate.gather.com. Please join and participate!)


Comments: 15
It is not time to end Affirmative Action.
In the end all Men judge another by how he Works not the shade of his skin. I don't know about women. This has been true since I was a young kid and is true today.
My foster Mom taught me that there are no Black People and there are no White People (unless albino) we are ALL some shade of Brown. Look around it is true.
Rude D.'s comment above is appalling. I thought the differences in life expectancy were related to not having medical trials that included minorities or women and therefore some of the treatments didn't work as well. Wow.
Prison sentences are also completely different between the races - as evidenced by 'crack' sentences (normally black defendants) and 'meth' sentences (normally white defendants).
Lyndon: good pick-up. I had cut and pasted the headline from the linked page (as a question), but then flipped the two words after I wrote the text. It seemed to make it more clear when I wrapped up the vote totals. But, I neglected to remove the question mark. Thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial Reviews
From The New Yorker
In this cogent jeremiad, which is certain to be controversial, Michaels diagnoses America's love of diversity as one of our greatest problems. Not only does it reinforce ideas of racial essentialism that it claims to repudiate; it obscures the crevasse between rich and poor. Michaels, a scholar of American literature, suggests that the growth of economic inequality over the past few decades is the result of a deeply ingrained and unchallenged class structure. Scrutinizing current events and religion, he argues that our fixation with the "phantasm" of race promotes identity over ideology, and he rejects the idea that meritocracy prevails in America's elite universities. A believer in the power of progressive politics, he calls for a debate in which class, rather than identity, would be at the fore.
Copyright © 2006