Congrats to the LA Times for printing this story. Of course, it has not been picked up and trumpeted as the positive news it is. We cannot have that, it may mean that we are actually winning - and then Bush might be proven right. AHHHHHHHhhhhhhh!!!!
Enough of my sarcasm - enjoy the read!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Los Angeles Times
November 19, 2007
Pg. 1
Sects Unite To Battle Al Qaeda In Iraq
Sunnis and Shiites work together at the local level to protect their neighborhoods from insurgents and militias.
By Doug Smith and Saif Rasheed, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers
QARGHULIA, IRAQ — Despite persistent sectarian tensions in the Iraqi government, war-weary Sunnis and Shiites are joining hands at the local level to protect their communities from militants on both sides, U.S. military officials say.
In the last two months, a U.S.-backed policing movement called Concerned Citizens, launched last year in Sunni-dominated Anbar province under the banner of the Awakening movement, has spread rapidly into the mixed Iraqi heartland.
Of the nearly 70,000 Iraqi men in the Awakening movement, started by Sunni Muslim sheiks who turned their followers against Al Qaeda in Iraq, there are now more in Baghdad and its environs than anywhere else, and a growing number of those are Shiite Muslims.
Commanders in the field think they have tapped into a genuine public expression of reconciliation that has outpaced the elected government's progress on mending the sectarian rift.
"What you find is these people have lived together for decades with no problem until the terrorists arrived and tried to instigate the problem," said Lt. Col. Valery Keaveny, commander of the 3rd Battalion, 509th Airborne unit in the Iskandariya area south of Baghdad. "So they are perfectly willing to work together to keep the terrorists out."
As late as this summer, there were no Shiites in the community policing groups. Today, there are about 15,000 in 24 all-Shiite groups and 18 mixed groups, senior U.S. military officials say. More are joining daily.
Here in Qarghulia, a rural community east of Baghdad, the results are palpable. Killings are down dramatically and public confidence is reviving.
"Sunnis-Shiites, no problem," said Obede Ali Hussein, 22, who stood at a checkpoint built by the U.S. Army along the Diyala River. "We want to protect our neighborhood."
For commanders in areas where Sunni-Shiite warring had brought normal life to a standstill, the unexpected flowering of sectarian cooperation has proved a boon.
"I couldn't do it without them," said Capt. Troy Thomas, whose 1st Cavalry unit is responsible for securing the Qarghulia area.
Thomas said 42 of the 49 traffic checkpoints in his area are manned by local groups, including Sunnis and Shiites. He said they both extend his reach and perform with a sensitivity that no U.S. soldier could match.
"They grew up in the area," Thomas said. "They know who should be there and who shouldn't."
At his checkpoint, Ali Hussein eyed a steady stream of cars, farm trucks and motor scooters weaving down the rural Diyala River road toward the main north-south highway.
"Nobody could drive through the street six weeks ago," he said. "The street was empty."
Before this year's troop buildup, U.S. soldiers seldom ventured into Qarghulia. The area was patrolled by two Baghdad-based companies, or about 160 men, said Col. Wayne Grigsby, commander of the 3rd Infantry Division's 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team. National police had little presence there, either, and when they did show up, were mistrusted by the populace.
In this lawless climate, Al Qaeda in Iraq held sway in the chronically violent Sunni city of Salman Pak, while Shiite militias enforced mafioso-style protection in Qarghulia.
In early May, Thomas set up a 90-strong outpost dubbed Patrol Base Assassin in Qarghulia's Four Corners area, a crossroads where the rural population shops in rows of concrete strip malls.
When he arrived, about half the shops were shuttered, and those still doing business were paying protection money to the Mahdi Army, a Shiite militia, Thomas said.
To restore security in his Vermont-shaped area of 150 square miles, Thomas sought help. National police units would augment his patrols with checkpoints on the busy highway, but he remained exposed along the rural roads to the east and west.
He didn't hesitate when the local sheiks, who had heard of the spreading Concerned Citizens movement, approached him.
The first group, formed in September, now maintains about a dozen checkpoints along the Diyala River on the area's western edge and patrols back roads. The sheiks, both Sunni and Shiite, selected a Sunni farmer, Abu Ammash, to be the group's leader and filled its ranks with their followers, who came from both sects.
Over a recent two-day period, Thomas, a Minnesota-bred martial arts specialist, spent a considerable amount of time in the company of sheiks, who were starting a second Concerned Citizens group to protect his eastern flank.
The new group will be headed by Hamed Gitan Khalaf, a Shiite and former sergeant major in the Iraqi army.
Gitan said sect plays no part in his command, which will be split almost evenly between Sunni and Shiite.
"All of us are hand in hand," he said.
The new group had a rocky initiation one morning when a squadron consisting of Thomas' soldiers, Gitan and his retinue of personal guards, a truckload of uniformed national police and a couple of carloads of civic officials descended upon the presumably abandoned house chosen to be its headquarters. They came face to face with a woman in a black hijab surrounded by scruffy children.
After an animated debate, Thomas vetoed Gitan's plan to forcibly move the family across the highway to an abandoned industrial building.
"What I need you to do is find a legitimate place," he told Gitan. "I know they're pretty much squatting here, but we're not going to be like Jaish al Mahdi" -- the Mahdi Army.
Later that day, the scene was repeated with a better plan. The family agreed to a payment and a promise of an equivalent house.
Next, Thomas brought all of Gitan's entourage behind the concrete walls of his base for screening -- retinal scans and digital fingerprinting -- and issued them badges and the sand-colored T-shirts of the Concerned Citizens.
"I don't want an American convoy to come down here and see a bunch of guys with guns and shoot them up," he said.
The exact size of the group was yet to be determined. Gitan said he had 1,500 volunteers, most of them unemployed. Thomas thought he needed only a dozen more checkpoints, enough to pay only a tenth of them.
Like other leaders, Gitan will probably put more men on the job and spread the money thinner to get the maximum number of youths employed.
Several guards interviewed by The Times said they were making between $100 and $125 a month -- about half the starting wage for a government worker, but real cash for a young man probably living with his family.
They emphatically said, however, that money was not their primary motivation.
"We are challenging the terrorists and we are ready to give our blood for the country," said Saddam Hadi Rasheed, 19, who was unemployed before joining Gitan's guard.
In some cases, Sunni and Shiite guards are being kept at arm's length. But Sunni and Shiite sheiks in Qarghulia said they have consciously put different tribes and sects into the field together to avoid any perception of favoritism.
So far, the handshake agreements among the sheiks and their followers have held up.
Still, infiltration by either Shiite militias or Al Qaeda in Iraq is a constant threat, as is the possibility of a group evolving into a new militia.
"Is this is just another way that someone can position himself to siphon his share in the community and be the godfather?" Col. Martin Stanton, chief of the Multinational Corps' reconciliation unit, said he wondered when he took the assignment.
But he said his skepticism has waned.
"That hasn't really happened on a large scale," he said. "You've got the will on the ground amongst the Iraqi people to stop fighting."
Sitting in his headquarters with a coterie of junior officers and sheiks, Qarghulia Concerned Citizens leader Abu Ammash foresaw big things. He said talks were underway with the Interior Ministry to transform his organization into the local police force for the area.
But, based on individual assessments of the men who make up the force, as well as simple math, U.S. commanders expect no more than a third of the Concerned Citizens to transition into the Iraqi security forces, whether the army, national police or local police.
The U.S. plan is to dismantle the Concerned Citizens groups once the economic revival that it hopes will be facilitated by their presence begins generating civilian jobs for them.
Until then, Ali Hussein, a day laborer before he became a guard, will remain at his post across the Diyala River from the Mahdi Army, ready to face enemy fire.
Although none of the new groups rising up against the Mahdi Army has yet been tested in combat, the danger is real. Last week, in a Sunni area just south of Baghdad, five members of a Concerned Citizens group were killed repelling an Al Qaeda in Iraq assault.
And one day recently, this graffiti appeared on several metal roll-up doors in a dingy strip mall here: "For the leaders of the Awakening and everybody who is involved with it, Warning: Death."
Ali Hussein didn't flinch.
"Most of their challenge is only with slogans," he said. "They are not courageous enough to face us. Even if they want to come, we are here ready to face them."
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
To those anti-war folks out there - victory is in sight! Come on over and celebrate, it will do you good!


Comments: 42
Thanks for posting this. You beat me to it.
And when we win, when we prevail, how can it not be a victory for America? How can it not be a victory for Bush? Or are you so blinded by hatred towards Bush that you cannot honestly concede that his steadfastness to the mission at hand has put us in a far better position than if we were to have cut and run?
Those leftists, like Christopher Hitchens, who have agreed, once in a blue moon, with Bush have been attacked openly in the liberal media.
It reminds one of the days when the American Left was completely controlled by Stalin and writers like John Dos Passos and George Orwell were attacked for being literally "politically incorrect".
Perhaps you should foward this article to the offices of Harry "The War is Lost" Reid and Nancy "I Can't Run Fast Enough" Pelosi.
The enmities are made and will not be undone. There is no functioning government. There is no parliment. There is not a civil society where what were once OUR values, a free press, rule of law, a fair judiciary, are established. To say, "good news, less violence, we're winning" is nothing more than an ignorant, myopic American point of view, as if the entire existance of Iraq revolves only around what our troops are doing or not doing in Iraq. That view is so small minded, so myopic as to be insignificant, except among you war supporters. The billions of the rest of us know this war has been a complete disaster for the Iraqi people, has seriously damaged the reputation of this once great nation, shows the American supporters of this war to be callous and dull-witted.
Wake up, man.
Equating victory with a drop in violence is grade school reasoning. We have contributed to the unnecessary deaths of over 1 million people in Iraq, and the diaspora of over 4 million more. A drop in violence is victory? Man, where do you get this?
So to all the naysayers, to all of the non-believers, the surge is working and Bush was right.
Because if they had made the trip to Baghdad, and seen the progress, they might have been asked some embarrassing questions when they got home. So the Democratic leadership strongly discouraged all from going there to see what's really going on.
Dale, you seem to be a military type, whether in now, or once was. I find it curious that more military people don't take offence at being used as pawns in a geopolitical struggle to control 60% of the world's easily recoverable oil reserves. Maybe you think it is ok to aggressively invade another country, under false pretenses, but fact to establish a permanent mililtary presense in this and several other spots in that region, to act as "constabulatory" forces and to protect in investments of American oil companies if and when they become more deeply involved in this place. The violence will end, more or less. Our presence there will illicit violence, and there will be sectarian violence, but I predict, it will decrease, simply because it is so counter-productive. That is why Shiite and Sunni can, in places, work together. It is in their immediate self-interest to do so.
But how many mililtary people are really rather tee-ed off about basically serving to stablize a situation into which an industry will come and reap all of the profits? The regular dude gets paid whatever he gets, the para-militaries get paid damn well, and the industry, well, you get the point, I hope. If Bush's idea of Victory revolves around his cronies in the oil industry, and securing the oil for them, and you guys are the ham in the sandwich... where do you stand with that? That's one of my problems with the concept of victory in Iraq.
Much of the rest of the world looks at our war of aggression unkindly, and don't know whether or how far to trust us. With good reason.
I checked the Congressional record. No record of any Dem traveling to Iraq over the break. Its not hard to figure out why.
Sunnis and Shia live among each other all over the Muslim world. The conflict between them is caused by radical elements, on both sides (again, all over the Muslim world). This could be a watershed, in Iraq, if it succeeds in exposing this truth to the wider Middle East, and shows Iraqi solidarity against the extremists. I don't know if this will happen, but this article shows a promising start.
Stephen D., Nov 20, 2007, 4:37pm EST
And, 300 million Americans can testify to no terrorists attacks in their hometowns since the War on Terror began.
Let's see: 300,000,000 to 16.
I'm going with the larger number and against the pin-heads.
Ivan, unfortunately, you are correct. We lost, the Iraqis have lost, those gaining are a very, very small minority. How does it feel to be a tool for their benefit? How many friends have you lost for their cause?
Christopher, there were many Sunni/Shiite marriages under Saddam, and throughout the regions they live in. The enmities are between the power elites in Iraq, enabled by the war profiteers who instigated this war of aggression, and who alone benefit from it. It was not the right thing to do. For the million plus dead, for the 4 million plus displaced it was the worst thing to have happen. Worse than living under Hussein. And, no, we have no "good commander" overseeing this. The drop in violence, and return of certain people to Iraq has causes that are partly due to an increase in security forces, IN CERTAIN AREAS, but also due in greater part -- not because of our troops -- but because of internal cooperations, efforts by Iran to help stabilize the security situation, because of al Sadr's efforts to reign in some of the militias during the period of the escalation of troops. So while the escalation HAS stabilized certain areas, other factors are as much if not more responsible for a lessening of violence.
Iraqi refugees in Syria are estimated to be returning to Iraq at a rate of about 1000 per day, not because of improved conditions, but because of expiring visas, and the inability to provide even the most basic necessities for thier families. Interviews of these people reveal they fear death and uncertainty upon return. And what do they return to? The ethnic cleansing in large areas has been more or less completed, and so they return to nothing... not their homes in many cases but uncertainty. Some victory for the Americans. You guys ought to be proud.
(In my best Jack Nicholson impersonation)
Logic? You can't handle logic!
There's nothing faulty with my logic, Stephen. The proof is in the pudding. You're just wrong.
You claim logical argument, but say nothing to prove it. You make no logical connections between A and B.
You say, A is A, because I say so. And you said absolutely nothing to prove A is A. No logical argument.
So where is your logic, Dave? Show me this pudding of yours.
You do know how to insert html bold face, though. That stands for something, I guess.
16 ... six more than ten. Take off your shoes (Go ahead, I'll wait.)
Now, look at all your fingers, and the five toes on your right foot, and the big toe on your left foot. (Man, I hope you're not an amputee.)
That's 16.
Now, count the number of Americans who have been killed by a terrorist attacks in the United States since 9/11, the starting date for the War on Terror.
I'll give you a hint ... 0.
Now, there are 300,000,000 million Americans (give or take, so let's just go with the round figure). 300,000,000 - 0 = ?
That's logic Stephen. Try it sometime, you just might like it.
Virtually everyone with a mouth and a set of eyes who's been to Iraq has gone on the record to state that the situation is vastly improved there since The Surge started. I also noticed that the Left Wing media has moved along to other "more pressing news". In other words, good news about Iraq snuffs out the Defeatist attitude. We've all known that you Lefties are fully invested in spreading bad news and hoping for the worst..............now we get to see you stew in your own juices as our troops are gaining more and more ground against the terrorist element in Iraq.
Yes Stephan there were and there were also things like this going on also under Saddam.
For 22 years, Jawad Amer Sayed was a dead man.
Two Iraqi brothers made their home a prison for 23 years to escape execution by Saddam Hussein's security forces, seeing daylight only after his fall.
http://www.desert-voice.net/iraqi_story.htm
But you're correct there were marriages under Saddam and mass graves. But I guess they don't count because you were lied to.
Saddam and his son's were WMD's they just did it much more painfully and slowly.
The sad part is, Charles; he wasn't even lied to by those he accuses. But hey, why let facts get in the way of a good ideological delusion.
Help me get a publishing deal with a 10 rating and a comment. I comment back.