For a Democratic Congress is now voting to fully fund the war in Iraq, as demanded by President Bush, and without any timetable for a U.S. troop withdrawal. Bush got his $100 billion, then ma
gnanimously agreed to let Democrats keep the $20 billion in pork they stuffed into the bill – to soothe the pain of their sellout of the party base." ~Buchanan
Now this is one of the few things this conservative two time Presidential hopeful has said which I immediately felt was something I (Kinda') agreed with. Clearly I still have to suppress a giggle every time one of these Republicans starts wringing their hands and sweating over their concern for pork spending . . . having mastered that so long ago themselves. Besides . . . it takes a real "religious" man to refer to the funding added for Katrina relief as Democratic "pork". But to agree with him in any way really creeps me out.
Yet the man has a point! In the midterm elections a message was sent . . . and has been promptly ignored. Now we can experience the dual stings of having been ruthlessly tossed aside (along with our message) and have these neoCONs do their 'victory dance' with those s-eating grins plastered on their faces.
So now we can also send our heartfelt thanks to our elected 'representatives' for dramatically increasing our presence instead of bringing our boys back home. For giving carte blanche to GW Bush. For lacking a backbone to put an end to this . . . at any cost to their self-interested political careers. These Democrats now find themselves detested as much as GW himself . . . and for, essentially, the same reason . . . our supposed War on a tactic . . . in Iraq. Like our War on Poverty and our War on Drugs . . . Rediculous terms being loosely bandied about without so much as a single rational voice saying "STOP!"
If the Geneva convention doesn't apply in the War on Terror . . . you know combatants without country affiliations or uniforms . . . does it stand to reason that we can lock up drug dealers in the same way - even to avoid presenting charges . . .you know . . . since it is a "war"?
Good ol Pat had his own explanation about why the DemoBRATS would give this to Bush. He said it was "Because they lack the courage of their convictions. Because they fear the consequences if they put their anti-war beliefs into practice. Because they are afraid if they defund the war and force President Bush to withdraw U.S. troops, the calamity he predicts will come to pass and they will be held accountable for losing Iraq and the strategic disaster that might well ensue."
Well . . . I can feel some relief finally. Was beginning to think either I had become a RepubliCON or HE had become a DemoBRAT . . . but here, HERE we can see the parting of the ways. It wasn't fear of consequences . . . or withdrawal . . . it wasn't lack of courage . . . that crap may spin real well for the CONservatives . . . but it doesn't fly too well over here in Reality world. The reality was those boys are over there. They are being held hostage by the person that put them over there! He, essentially has his NeoCON gun pointed right at these guys and is threatening to pull the trigger . . . political suicide . . . but is it? Has he EVER given a damn about anything anybody else thought? I seriously doubt it, and I mean for his ENTIRE life. He can't be President again . . . so he can mark that off his "To Do" list. He would never take a lesser Political office . . . He's saying "I'll do it" and the Democrats had TWO choices. Cave . . . or tell him to "Do it then"! Guess who blinked?
Democrats did. They simply believed he would pull the trigger. I have said - all along . . . they can't win on this because they DO care about the soldiers. So they take a hit from their infuriated power base . . . a deserved one.
But who's kidding who? Come election time . . . what choices will we be looking at? More Neo-Cons . . . or more spineless representatives? So the anti-war group becomes, essentially, nothing more than another fringe group . . . like the religious zealouts on the extreme right . . . a movement without options. The religious fanatics must vote Republican . . . and the Antiwar crowds Must vote Democrat . . . and the main party can do anything they want because we have no options.
What we CAN do though . . . Is vote OUT every single one of these Democrats in every Primary election . . . everytime they are put to a vote. . . . Then vote FOR every Democrat that wins the Primary.
See how your people voted . . . And remember!


Comments: 17
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
I got the feeling that the Dem's big win was a fluke, a result of a combination of things that will never happen again. Guess that shows what I know. Your suggestion seems kinda risky.
But I do understand that Bush has veto power on any/all bills that come his way. Then the bill had to go back to the floor for a 2/3 majority vote (hope I got that right). And that's how the Bush-man keeps dems (old and new) powerless.
Something we completely agree about Doyle. A third moderate party is needed, one that neither extreme would ever support, but the majority of average Americans can consistently relate too.
In the end . . . we elect people to represent us. Look at your representative (I linked it with the word 'vote' in the article. If you have a voice and your guy (or gal) is doing what you wish . . . no problem. If not . . . hire somebody who will. Risky or not . . . we all should have a voice in decisions this big.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
I DO know what you mean. This kind of reaction is something we see in unpopular wars and in illegal wars. The boys, and yes - they ARE boys, are not to blame. The goverment that sends them is. This, to me, is why it is SO easy to support the troops . . . and to oppose the government that thrusts them needlessly into peril . . . my son included.
Some people don't understand the mindset required on these kids to engage in combat. I hope they never understand it. The result, of course, is a military that supports each other and, as opposition increases, feel they MUST NOT be doing something wrong or illegal . . . how else can they function? Most military "grunts" will support Bush. It's not a matter of right and wrong . . . they have to believe they're protecting National Security. How else can they continue to do their jobs? To justify watching friends get maimed and killed?
My father was military, as was his brother, and they did their overseas combat tours . . . my father in 1972, my Uncle TWO tours . . . and in 1972 Major General Westmoreland (now) admits to lying to keep casualty counts down to avoid helping those who oppose the war.
And the theory behind the war? The "Domino" theory? Clearly it was flawed. To help; this country installed and support a corrupt Diem . . .
Wouldn't it be better to do it legally and as a last resort? Gulf I veterans didn't have an issue. Where was the huge opposition on the legal war? Nowhere.
Sorry about your friend. Four of my five uncles were killed . . . the sole surviving uncle was a WWII veteran who lost a leg in the battle of the Argonnes (Battle of the Bulge).
". . . what eventually killed him - not the crosshairs of an enemy, but the crosshairs of his home."
Excellent point. Right now I just want my son home . . . the next battle will undoubtedly follow as he has had serious combat in TWO extended deployments with his Ranger unit in Iraq AND Afghanistan. First things first. But if you cannot win . . . when do you bring them home instead of piling more in? I lived through the Vietnam conflict too . . . the more they sent, the more they lost . . . and what was accomplished? EVENTUALLY . . . it must end. Period.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
What would be good in all this is to find some way to see the good in even the worst. I often present a very challenging perspective in my comments only to help some get out of a narrow view of contentious issues. Just as with a child who might be misbehaving in the school yard like a bully, if we can encourage the good in that person, we generally will find common ground everyone can work with. Bush to now has represented a gut reaction many of us had when 9-11 occurred. No painful image has so stuck in my memory as seeing my beloved Twin Towers go down in blood and smoke except perhaps the one one in childhood: the assassination of Jack Kennedy. Several hundred years ago, when similar, culturally divisive issues also were very contentious for the similar reasons we see in today's world, Jalaluddin Rumi - a poet and scholar - stated: All true faiths are based on the same mystical Oneness, since all humanity cherishes the same fundamental values. I saw recently a video on Youtube that illustrates this very well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWyJJQbFago
Let's see if we can't encourage that "good." I can be very opinionated sometimes here because in my work and in my life I have seen and experienced horrific suffering most people only read about. And due to that I have studied the roots of human suffering throughout history. One's "hard opinion" in a discussion generally does not change anyone else's hard-line opinion. My only reason for expressing in an intelligent way, a view that generally is expressed with gut emotions due to suffering, is to provoke newer and more positive ways to problem solve issues which Bush, and really any leader, has inherited from the past. The perspective I've described in many of my comments here needs to be stated in an intelligent way so that we don't keep reacting and giving more inertia to these issues from the past. Does that make sense?
Perhaps someone here can write an intelligent article about the Bush administration's handling of the illegal immigration issue that illustrates the common ground and good which this president also is engaged in. He is a family man invested in home and hearth, and therefore, as Rumi stated, Bush's personal faith reflects somewhere a common ideal which all of humanity shares in. When he was governor of Texas, I see that most of his activities in that area were rather well-balanced. Let's see if we can't remind him of that.
In most of my present work I do this "positive reinforcement" through folk tales and other writing that evoke those evocatively optimistic and creative - and very solution-oriented - archetypes which we all have in us, tentatively waiting in the wings to find expression.