Nearly 45 million Americans face excruciating everyday choices about perhaps the most important aspect of their lives—their health. A young man may opt to ignore the unrelenting pain in his stomach because he can’t afford an expensive doctor’s visit. Parents may have no choice but to bankrupt their family in order to pay for the treatment of their child’s serious illness. These are the kinds of decisions that nearly one out of every six Americans must make because they are uninsured in the richest nation in the world.
Bill Bradley’s frustration with the U.S. health care system that has abandoned so many of its citizens is palpable in The New American Story, his new book of policy ideas for making a “better, stronger, truer country.” Bradley’s prescription for health care—a “hybrid” approach combining government subsidies, private plans, and a focus on prevention—finds its roots in a vision for reform the Center for American Progress has long advocated. Like CAP’s Plan for a Healthy America Bradley envisions a nation where all Americans enjoy guaranteed, affordable health coverage.
The talent of American doctors and the excellence of our technology may mean that the United States has the best health care in the world, but our health care system is in a dismal state. “We spend nearly twice as much per capita on health care as Germany and Canada do,” Bradley writes, yet America ranks 28th in the world on infant mortality, 31st in life expectancy, and we top the charts on obesity. Our health care spending isn’t just large, it’s also growing: between 2015 and 2020, health care expenditures are expected to reach 20 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product.
These ever-escalating costs mean that Americans who don’t receive health coverage through their employers or through public health insurance programs are left without affordable coverage. Preventable tragedies are the result: the Institute of Medicine estimates that 18,000 people die every year because they lack health coverage, and thus go without care that could have saved their lives.
How can we fix the broken health care system? Bradley’s vision for universal coverage clearly is founded on the ideas CAP has put forth in its health care policy platform, the Plan for a Healthy America.
First, to ensure affordable health care for everyone, CAP advocates that we build on the pillars of the current system—public programs and private plans. We would expand and simplify Medicaid eligibility, while simultaneously using what Bradley calls a “hybrid” approach—government subsidies to enable coverage through private plans—for individuals who do not qualify for Medicaid coverage. Individuals would be given subsidies for private insurance coverage based on their income and delivered through tax credits. Access to affordable care also would be improved through the creation of a new group insurance pool similar to the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.
Under CAP’s plan, this new purchasing pool would provide a new opportunity for individuals, small businesses and large businesses to buy affordable coverage. Through this pool, income-based tax credits to subsidize premiums, expanded access to Medicaid, and existing employer-based coverage arrangements, everyone will have affordable options for health coverage. Once these options are in place, everyone will be required to have coverage. Bradley also supports this type of requirement. “It must be mandatory for all Americans to have health insurance,” he writes in The New American Story: “low income cannot be an acceptable barrier.”
Beyond ensuring guaranteed health coverage for all Americans, CAP’s vision for health care reform places great emphasis on fixing the broken elements of the nation’s health care system, particularly the issues of ever-escalating health care costs and rampant inefficiency. Bradley endorses a health care plan that reigns in runaway costs. “Some estimates have put total annual administrative costs in our health system as high as $300 billion,” he writes—noting that anyone who has recently seen a doctor would recognize the red tape and lack of coordination that plague our health care system. Public investments in comparative effectiveness research, which identifies the best therapies, drugs and devices for a given health condition, and new public incentives for the expanded use of health information technology, such as personal electronic health records and computerized physician order-entry systems, would greatly improve the value we receive for our health care spending by improving quality, targeting appropriate care, and reducing administrative costs.
Bradley, echoing CAP’s proposals, says that another important way we can control costs—and make sure we improve our health, not just our health care system—is by making prevention a national priority. Adults receive only half of recommended clinical preventive services, and most adults lack the tools they need—such as supports for improving their diets, quitting smoking, or starting an exercise program—to improve their health. We need to focus on preventive care in doctors’ offices and in our communities.
Last October CAP proposed a Wellness Trust that makes prevention a centerpiece of practical health care reform—a way to improve Americans’ health and help cut soaring health care costs. “Health care should be a right,” Bradley writes in The New American Story. “But rights come with responsibilities attached. Individuals must take responsibility for their own health by how they behave.” If we all try to be healthier—and if our government helps us reach that goal—then we can stop putting unnecessary strains on our health system due to avoidable illnesses.
We can and must achieve affordable health coverage for all Americans. The proposals laid out by the Center for American Progress and embraced by Bill Bradley are common-sense, practical strategies for how we can make this happen.


Comments: 8
Many Legal Americans cannot afford health coverage because 15-20 million illegals have flooded the American job market, lowering both wages, and bebefits packages that include health care.
Maybe a coomonsense approach would be to:
A) Close and secure our Southern Border.
B) Imprison and severely fine those who hire illegals.
C) Eliminate Safe Harbor Communities, and deport those illegally here.
GEE, what a concept. Improve the lot of America's middle and lower classes through enforcement of our laws.
Porgie T., I don't agree with your views on immigration, but just so you know, according to the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured the large majority of the 45 million people who are uninsured in the U.S. population are native or naturalized U.S. citizens (80 percent). You can see the Kaiser Commission report at http://www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/7451-021.pdf, and the part of it that references native and naturalized citizens is on page 4.
Big companies like Walmart and the like create a HUGE demand for such workers, which they cannot hire legally in the USA. So, they hire illegals who will work for pennies on the dollar and will keep their mouths shut about slave wages anyhow.
Slave wages here are better than no wages in Mexico, so demand plus wages equals the huge numbers of illegals we now have in America. Your ideas about conserving health care for legal, native Americans are fine. But it looks to me like you're attacking illegal immigration from the wrong end. Keep US cheap labor employers within the law and the illegal immigration problem will soon clear up. Thanks! :)
Besides, you go Bill Bradley! You do ALL Americans a big favor in raising the urgent need for health care coverage for all of us - even if it should turn out to be socialized medicine as in France, Canada and Britain. Universal socialized medicine is far better than the broken beyond repair health system we have now in the USA.
On the other hand, bringing government into the Healthcare industry in a bigger way will simply inject steriods into the feeding frenzy of special interests and lobbyist.
May I humbly propose that we cease ALL discussion of Universal Healthcare until such time as we have rolled back Healthcare costs by 50% and experience our 5th consecutive year of negative Healthcare inflation.
There are a number of ways to do this.
1) Outsource ALL non-critical procedures to places like Thailand and Singapore where costs are 1/10th our costs.
2) Eliminate ALL non-deductable insurance benefits - i.e. EVERYONE pays something including extremely poor people -- even if it is $1 per office visit.
3) Allow drugs that have passed EU certification to bypass FDA approval.
4) Require that mental health protocols meet the same standards of effecacy as that we require for other protocols.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/HealthCare/wm1045.cfm
(Pardon the source of this link, but this law as a true bipartisan effort and the criticism of the law does not conform to party lines.)
To my mind, the issue of insurance coverage and cost of health care are separate issues.
I expect that the current MA plan to pressure small businesses and spend tax moneys to get everyone covered will be problematic, but it is an impressive political accomplishment that will provide a starting point and hard epidemiologic data that will lead to better and better plans. Other states (ie. California), where the landscape of insurers or the uncovered demographic is very different from MA, may need a different approach.
The cost of health care should be an issue debated between insurers and hospitals/physician organizations, not on the floor of the congress. Although there is a perception that illegal immigrants in emergency rooms and overuse of new technologies is the major contribution, it is more likely that the real cost is in treating chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease, and in end of life care.
Until Americans own up to their vices, control obesity, stop smoking, and realize that there is some dignity in dying at home unattached to machines, the cost of health care will not drop.
The other big cost is drugs. This is a much trickier problem to solve and unfortunately may require the unsavory solution of limited access to certain drugs by those who cannot afford them.
A) 80 percent native born, still leave 9 million illegals and their children in the equation.
B) My primary point, that you fail to address is valid. Deport the illegals, fine and imprison executives or owners of businesses that hire illegals, and the basic laws of supply and demand will see both American wages, and BENEFITS (such as heathcare) increase, thus reducing the number of uninsured LEGAL AMERICAN CITIZENS.
Mexico, where 63 percent of illegal aliens come from pampers their rich with not thought to taking care of their own, which is proven by their tax rate on the rich of 10.7 percent...it's time they take care of their own, instead of using America as their nations welfare roll.