Today, when I opened Yahoo, I came across a disturbing article. Kellogg is avoiding a lawsuit because parents are scared that child obesity is on the rise and Kellogg looks to be in the scope of it all.
Obese children are that way because of the cereal they eat? And that's Kellogg's fault? If you are a parent, maybe you should remove the television and not allow your children to sit in front of it for all hours of the evening. Maybe the PARENT should buy food such as fruit and vegetables and instill values in their children what is healthy and what is not. Maybe the PARENT should enroll their children in sports and keep them active and entertained. When did it become company's faults that children (or even adults) are becoming obese?
Did any of you watch the show regarding the guy that ate McDonald's for a month straight? The weight that he gained took him 9 months to lose. And there are people that are sueing McDonald's because they are fat. Hey, Jackass, how about you drive to the nearest grocery store and buy yourself a salad with low-fat dressing and work out a couple hours after work?
It works the same for children and their parents. It is the parent's responsibility to keep their child at a regular weight, not the company of the food that THEY buy their children.
Here is the story from Yahoo:
WASHINGTON - Kellogg Co., the world's largest cereal maker, has agreed to raise the nutritional value of cereals and snacks it markets to children.
The company said it won't promote foods in TV, radio, print or Web site ads that reach audiences at least half of whom are under age 12 unless a single serving of the product meets these standards:
_No more than 200 calories.
_No trans fat and no more than 2 grams of saturated fat.
_No more than 230 milligrams of sodium, except for Eggo frozen waffles.
_No more than 12 grams of sugar, not counting sugar from fruit, dairy and vegetables.
Kellogg said it would reformulate products to meet these criteria or stop marketing them to children under 12 by the end of 2008.
"By committing to these nutrition standards and marketing reforms, Kellogg has vaulted over the rest of the food industry," said Michael F. Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "This commitment means that parents will find it a little easier to steer their children toward healthy food choices — especially if other food manufacturers and broadcasters follow Kellogg's lead."
Jacobson's nutrition advocacy group, along with two Massachusetts parents and the Boston-based Campaign For A Commercial-Free Childhood, had served notice in January 2006 of intent to sue Kellogg and the Nickelodeon cable TV network under a Massachusetts law to stop them from marketing junk food to kids.
Center spokesman Jeff Cronin said Kellogg contacted the plaintiffs shortly thereafter and began negotiating the new standards, so the lawsuit was not filed and will not be filed.
"We are pleased to work collaboratively with industry and advocacy groups to unveil these standards," said David Mackay, Kellogg's CEO. "We feel the Kellogg Nutrient Criteria set a new standard for responsibility in the industry."
With 2006 sales of almost $11 billion, Kellogg is not only the No. 1 cereal-maker but also a leading producer of snack foods. Its brands include Kellogg's, Keebler, Pop-Tarts, Eggo, Cheez-It, Rice Krispies and Famous Amos.
Globally, 50 percent of the products Kellogg markets to children do not meet the criteria, said Mark Baynes, Kellogg's chief marketing officer. A third of the cereals it markets to children in the U.S. fall outside standards.
Pop-Tarts and Froot Loops don't meet the criteria, though most cereals fall inside the calorie guideline, Baynes said. Meeting the sugar and sodium standards could be the most challenging.
Kellogg also announced that it will continue to refrain from advertising to children under age 6, and will not in the future:
_Advertise to children any foods in schools and preschools that include kids under age 12.
_Sponsor placement of any of its products in any medium primarily directed at kids under age 12.
_Use branded toys connected to any foods that do not meet the nutrition standards.
_Use licensed characters on mass-media ads directed primarily to kids under 12 or on the front labels of food packages unless they meet the standards.
The advertising agreement does not apply to marketing characters Kellogg owns, like Tony the Tiger, but it does apply to characters the food company licenses, like the cartoon figure Shrek, said Susan Linn, co-founder of the Campaign For A Commercial-Free Childhood.
She said Kellogg was the first food company to agree to restrict advertising using licensed media characters like Shrek.
"These characters play an incredibly important role in children's lives. Kids see them every day; they have toys of them," Linn said. "The media characters are much more powerful (than company-owned characters like Tony the Tiger). The food companies want to keep using them because they sell a lot of food; kids really respond to them."
Earlier this month, a Federal Trade Commission study found that half the ads for junk food, sugary cereals and soft drinks are on children's programs, double the percentage 30 years ago. Children between ages 2 and 11 saw approximately 5,500 food ads on television in 2004, half of them on kids' shows with audiences of 50 percent children or greater.
American companies spend about $15 billion a year marketing and advertising to children under age 12, the Institute of Medicine said last year when it warned that one-third of American children are obese or at risk for becoming obese.
In response, Kellogg and McDonald's Corp. joined eight other major food and drink companies last November in an industry-sponsored pledge to promote more healthy foods and exercise in their child-oriented advertising. A year earlier, Kraft Foods Inc. had promised to curb ads to young children for snack foods, including Oreos and Kool-Aid.
___
Associated Press writer Ann Sanner contributed to this report.


Comments: 25
I have the same pet peeve as you. It seems everyone wants to sue someone these day. Like the woman who sued Mcdonalds because her son was obese. She said it was mcdonalds fault as he ate his supper there each night as she worked. Well Dah!!!!!!!! Prepare him some nutrituous food before you go to work and he can heat it up.. Wake up parents.......it is not Kelloggs fault and it is not mcdonalds fault....
Seems everyone is looking to blame someone else for our own choices. We make the choices as to what we eat not the companies who sell them.
esther--thanks!
It's interesting, because since Cal has been here, I've been thinking about this more. With the weather being so hot, he's drinking bottled water rather than sports drinks or kool aid. Hopefully, it will be something he continues. It's these little modifications that make it easier to walk a healthier food path.
That kids are attracted to food advertised is just one element of what causes lots of issues. The targeting and profiling that goes into modern advertising be it on television, magazines, toys, movies -- any place they push merchandise is unbelievable. But, while I completely agree that parents often abdicate their responsibility with their kids - and take the easy way out, I also think that we need to make our children able to see the mechanics behind our consumer culture and let them gradually take the responsibility themselves. My husband has always said that the best parent is the one who raises kids who eventually don't need their parents at all.
Thanks.
Shan--I just wish most kids were like Cal, in most regards.
Susan--I'm with you on all of that. My parents are a little bigger, not obese, but it's in my genes to be on the heavier side. I'm trying to cut back on calories lately so I don't lose that battle, but time will tell.
Christine--trust me, I had all that stuff available also. I probably could be a poster child for Kellogg, but I definitely was a lot more active than the children today.
Madame--I love the part that your children can cook up a dream meal. Do any of them live close?
Jackie--you kill me. I don't even have a comeback and that doesn't happen often.
L to da Cee--you might want to sue the things that make her active. You know, like the bicycle company, the company that makes basketballs and even running shoes.
I remember when I was young - you were outside playing all day. Especially when the weather was nice. Even in the winter we went out and played. If it was raining - we were BUMMED!!! Nobody wanted to play inside.
As far as food. Please - look around the grocery store at other people's carts and you'll puke.. Hardly any ever have fruits or veggies. Always the junk.. Believe me I am no angel and yes I do buy some junk but you have to draw a line.
I have to say - my husband and I both work (me only part time) but we cook dinner 6 out of 7 nights a week. And we really cook - not microwave processed crap.
Last night we got pizza - but we got a salad with it. So even when we eat out we try to be a little healthy.
I agree with you Robiyah. I take responsibility for my child's health and well being.
When your quilty you just dont comment........Norma
1. Name, age, location
2. Contact information: phone number and email address
3. Please write a brief description about your family and how obesity has affected it
4. Email a recent family photo