If I were looking for Gather points I might have posted this question in a more controversial way, but I am beginning to think that somebody needs to tell society-at-large what we women REALLY want. I warn you here that this is a political article, so those of you who wish to go elsewhere, do it now.
What got me so aggravated about this subject? An article I happened upon in wired.com from last year about some of the features on a 'She-Phone' that designers were contemplating. It is just a mild example of the same old crap that confines women and compartmentalizes us and keeps us from fully participating in society.
Just for the gag effect, here are some of the features they were considering:
1. A condom dispenser
2. A mirror and compact
3. A pill dispenser (for Xanax, Birth Control, or What?)
4. A vibrator (not the kind for silent notification of a pending phone call)
5. A mace dispenser
And all in a pink phone.
Honestly, after I put away my calculator (yes, I love math) and logged off the rest of the Wired science blogs I had been reading (yes, I can also comprehend scientific theory) I screeched out loud. Doesn't anybody get us after all these millenia?
When are corporations going to realize that not all women in their employ speak for all women not in their employ. First of all, why not ask us what we want in a phone? I would like a one-button panic (or even voice activated) with a GPS locator so that whether I am having a heart attack or being attacked by some Kreton, I can quickly call the cops or an ambulance.
Pink? You have got to be kidding. I love black and red and intense greens and blues, as do most of the women I know. Three-year-olds like pink, guys, not grown women with cell phones.
Secondly, I would like a phone that doesn't break every time I drop it.
Yes... Sprint, who refused to replace my phone even though I had insurance because I had replaced it too many times... I want a phone as resilient and tough as I am. So what if I broke that last butt-ugly, slippery phone you claimed was meant for military use. The minor detail you neglected to mention, of course, was that the reception was so bad I would avoid using it. No one I called could hear me through all that warbling.
From the new phone designs I assume the designers haven't noticed how much crap we are simultaneously carrying around already. Grunts may have sixty pounds of gear, but at varying times I've got 40 pounds of five-year-old, four grocery bags, my over-stuffed ten pound purse, my briefcase, my yoga mat, my keys and my cell phone. These things are not easily folded up, compacted and slung across one's back. Then again, these are minor, meaningless details in the modern world, aren't they? So let's get serious.
Nobody seems to understand what we want from society either, or if they do, nobody's talking. Things have changed so much in the last 100 years that our roles are all mis-matched. We do not need you to support us anymore (although it is lovely if you choose to do so), and you don't need us to cook and do your laundry (although you can imagine our delight when this is expected from us).
Heavens, we can choose a turkey baster to be the 'no legal rights' father of our children, and you haven't needed to marry the cow to get the milk (horrible cliche) for over a generation. Then again, many of us still are set on having one of you under any conditions. No matter how intelligent, we have some who will go to almost any lengths to keep you, no matter what you've done. Yes, I know forgiveness can be a spiritual blessing to all, Hillary, but some things should be unforgettable at least.
As long as we are talking about women and the trivialization of our power, however, I must bring up the subject of our blessed soldiers in Iraq. All the women I know are very much against this war. One must then ask, if we are 51% or 52% of the general population and 61% of the voters in the democratic primary in South Carolina were WOMEN, why are we not using that power to bring our courageous troops home? The Iraqis are now using us and our fire and manpower for their own slimy power grabs.
I'm sorry, but our soldiers are much too valuable to be exploited by politicians, whether they are ours or theirs. I'm not trying to create a divide where there isn't one, but the majority of Americans finally realize the war is wrong. We get beaten down because we don't stand up. We will always get ignored if we don't speak forcefully and with authority.
The women I know who are not political cringe when we're making our holiday wreaths or together for a baby shower or other event if they think I am revving up. I don't blame them. If I was doing nothing about something so important, I would feel badly too. I know these women feel powerless, but nothing is ever hopeless unless we fail to even try to change it.
We have so many enduring problems in this country. Look at New Orleans and the devastation of families, neighborhoods and their economy. Look at all the things Bush did not mention in his State of the Union address. Poverty's up. Crime's up. School drop outs are up. Infrastructure of the bridges, roads, sewers and water systems is falling apart. Border security is diminished and more illegal immigrants are crossing the borders than ever before. Port security has been cut. Grants to cities and towns across the nation have been cut. Social services, government or private, are struggling to try to meet even a fraction of the need.
The only thing that is grander than before is the number of troops sent to the middle east to try to contain that horrendous mess while Bush and his cronies steal their oil resources and/or tie them up for the next century.
We really do have a lot of power, ladies, and all of us have to stand up and start acting from our heads and our hearts. We need to integrate those two organs. We know what is right but we focus on our families and our friends while the world goes to hell in a hand basket. This is not role modeling for our young. It serves no one to be quiet about our views, even if there is going to be some blowback that is unpleasant and hostile.
Yes, we've come a long way, baby, but are we still reluctant to stand up and be counted? Are we still letting ourselves be influenced by leaders who drag our children into wars that our forefathers would abhor? The Iraqi killing field is a disgrace and if we women sit home or go to work with blinders on because it makes us feel ill to really consider the 300,000 innocent civilians who were killed by our military and the almost four thousand of our own who have died... shame on us.
Obama has committed to bring the troops home and Edwards has dropped out of the race as of this morning. Call the Obama campaign volunteers in your area and get on the phones. Let's stand up and be counted. I am no longer satisfied with living a trivial life. I hope you won't be either.


Comments: 30
I taught seminary for 14 years. One year I did a lesson on how women were treated.
I gave this sanerio to get my point across.
A man who lived in a remote area over seas flew into the airport at Washington DC. It was night and dark. He had never been on a plane before. He had never been to the US before. He had never seen our magazines before. This man was very poor when it comes to money. He had no TV or Radio nor had he ever seen them before.
Now he goes directly to the motel. Gets into his room and lays down. ON his nightstand are a few of our most popular magazines. He opens them and looks at the scanty dressed women in the adversisments. He then figures out how to turn on the TV and again he sees women with little on. He sees how men treat the women.
Now my question is: What does this man think the opinion of women is in the United States?
We need to stop all this silliness and instill in our daughters a true sense of equality and worth.
I think we need to discuss female equality in broader terms - using only how the media portrays them creates an equally unjust and discriminatory reaction to females, which many of the fundamentalist religions have done.
Now to put this in perspective, I am old enough to have been a college student that traveled to several major cities in my home state and marched FOR the original ERA amendment.
In the intervening years I, like many of my contemporaries have come to realize thjat MOST (not all) of the women demanding equality are actually seeking CONTROL and preference.
I'm all for equality... long as it is MANDATORY, scripted, contracted and punitive (just like a man who refuses to work is treated in a punitive manner by society), and for gohds sake EVEN HANDED!
Women DO have a harder time than men in many ways, but this isn't an example of that.
Why would my friend's daughter, an eight-year-old, ask her mother if a certain outfit made her look sexy? Because that is the new 'pretty'.
Statistics thirty years ago showed that girls at 13 knew exactly what they wanted out of life academically and professionally but by 16 were completely confused and disoriented. What changed? Their sexuality, of course, but also their 'need' to be attractive and sexy to men, which for many became their temporary life goal.
Joseph H.... you made me crack up. I bet you have a pink shirt or two as well and I commend you for your daring.:)
Doc,... you are correct. Many women get confused when they seek autonomy and instead of staying true to a higher form of management, they get power-crazed and start acting like the men who oppressed them. In think there is a technical term for this... blowback? :)
Even-handed is definitely the way things should be and when men can be the 'host' for those developing fetuses, we will all be equal. :)
I agree more women should step up and raise hell to let their opinons known. I find house holds where the woman is voting for someone not because "she" chose a candidate but because he told her who to vote for. Women hold a tremendous amount of untapped power and as far as I am concerned its time to use.
Good article Elizabeth.
But I've never broken a phone, so that must not be a "female" problem, lol. And I like red too.
NOT.
I have to completely agree. A great example from the article:
"One must then ask, if we are 51% or 52% of the general population and 61% of the voters in the democratic primary in South Carolina were WOMEN, why are we not using that power to bring our courageous troops home?"
I hate to break it to you, but it's entirely possible that 61% of the voters in the democratic primary had other issues that were more important to them, or perhaps they felt that another candidate was the better choice?
What gives you the ego to claim that everyone who does not follow your opinions is wrong?
I am advocating that women take the power on this Iraq issue, as look what the majority of male power has gotten us into? Not you personally, of course. There are many issues out there that other people think are more important, like the economy, health care, the stock market, the real estate/credit market crash and I think those things are important too.
I am not saying the women went to the polls to please me or vote for what I wanted. The point is, they went to the polls in huge numbers, and that thrills me no end. Younger women had been absentee in the last few elections, and that disturbed me terribly.
I hope other women agree with my most important beliefs, but if they don't, they don't.
I just don't want somebody's husband standing over her absentee ballot and telling her which hole to punch or which circle to blacken, know what I mean? I don't want your wife doing that to you either.
If I didn't think I was right, Greg, I certainly wouldn't put my opinions out there, but my article wasn't about my ego. It was about women listening to their hearts and minds and ignoring the other competing voices that seize their personal power. I am arrogant enough to believe that most women do not like aggressive wars over oil and other riches and would prefer to live more modest, less-consumptive lives with fewer material things in exchange for living children and a military that protects us, not the corporations.
Women all around the world are afraid to speak the truth to their men. This saddens me but when they are afraid to speak the truth among themselves or to themselves? The thought horrifies me, as that is true domination.
But that's just me and another article that might get racier than this one. By the way, I don't want your power. I want you to keep it. I just want mine and the right to exercise it, dress like I want to without being accused of 'tempting' men (oh, don't worry... that wouldn't happen these days if I rode naked into town on my neighbor's horse), the right to have a full education, the right to control of my own body in every way, the right to have children, the right to a comfortable old age, and a blended society in which I don't have to fear or fear for my fellow man (or woman).
you left out a word..
"Women all around the world are afraid to speak the truth to their men. This saddens me but when they are afraid to speak the truth among themselves or to themselves? The thought horrifies me, as that is true[SELF] domination."
I am not saying the women went to the polls to please me or vote for what I wanted. The point is, they went to the polls in huge numbers, and that thrills me no end. Younger women had been absentee in the last few elections, and that disturbed me terribly."
Unfortunately, the way you came across was much more of a "every woman should vote based strictly on this one issue". It also makes the assumption that everyone who wants us out of the war agrees that the best way to do it is an immediate and complete withdrawal leaving Iraq in chaos. (to put it simply, they don't) :)
I wish there were some alternatives, but I personally feel that there's not a single candidate, not even those who have dropped out, that has actually offered up ANY alternative. Yeah they go around doing the political rhetoric; stay until "victory", get out immediately, set a timetable... but really, even the people who say things like there must be a timetable for withdrawal haven't bothered suggesting what that timetable should look like.
Iraq just isn't the absolute top issue anymore though. If you ask people what's more important to them, their job or the war, they will tell you it's their job. If you ask about their home or the war, they will tell you it's their home. That's why you won't see a nationwide rally around a "Get out of Iraq" movement, whether it's from men or women or both.
The sad thing is that until we stop spending our treasury in Iraq, our own American economy cannot recover enough to protect people's jobs, families, homes, health care and quality of life. Americans generally vote their pocketbook and had Bush been able to control the media, the markets, the global economy and the housing meltdown, more Republicans might have gotten in this November. As it is? Everybody has wised up.
IF it is easy for us to 'forget' that we started a war, occupied a country and killed 300,000 to estimates of 500,000 by some... then that doesn't say much about us in my opinion.
I hope you are wrong, Greg. I hope the American public hasn't lost 'interest' in an illegal war and occupation that has turned into a quagmire in everybody's opinion, not just mine.
I do think the American people care deeply about Iraq but mainly leaving it.
Lately the issues have gotten even more personal. It is the loss of our jobs, the cost of our kids' school expenses, our outrageously expensive medical care, our shaky financial system, our credit crunch and stock market gyrations and housing value losses... and a list too long for a comment.
Until a president who is a real leader gets into office and sees the 'big picture', which is now all 'classified' along with all the other documents not-yet-shredded in the Bush White House, how can anyone give specifics beyond some basic generalities. You ask too much of us, Greg.
We should have a couple of states where women live lol
However, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect those that are vehemently declaring that we need a new strategy in regards to Iraq to give us some sort of idea what they have in mind. If they don't tell us what they have in mind, they're basically asking us to trust them. Trust... THEM? Every single candidate that is in the race is a career politician, many of them from the senate. The senate's approval ratings are even worse than the president's, so why should we trust them?
Perhaps I do expect a lot. I just don't feel it's right to lower your expectations to find a candidate to vote for.
I spent time being politically active, I have been underpaid and overworked. I have seen men assume positions of authority that they did not deserve instead of truly qualified women who were then forced (if they wanted to keep their job) to do all the work for their new "boss".
Women do not have equal rights in this country. This is our law.
Trivialization of women is inherent in the fabric of our culture.
Women wore hideous suits in the workplace to seem more "competent". The more like a man they appeared the more likely they were to be promoted, but only so far.
Women and men are different. We need to stop trying to make women into men.
Pink is a good color, my brother loves it.
Just why are the remaining canidates spending so much for this office? POWER
So right, Michelle. It is up to all the women with younger women in the family and friends to set an example and show that it is possible to be something other than a body or a screeching harpy.
Thanks for the post.