One day after President Bush signed into law a bill that requires
public disclosure of the national intelligence budget, the House of
Representatives adopted an amendment to prevent that requirement from
taking effect.
The budget disclosure provision appeared in legislation enacting the
recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, which was passed by Congress
last month and signed by President Bush on August 3.
If implemented, it would mark the first time that Congress successfully
asserted its authority to compel disclosure of currently classified
information over the objections of the executive branch. Since 1998,
the intelligence bureaucracy has consistently refused to divulge the
intelligence budget total. The White House stated on February 28 that
budget disclosure "could cause damage to the national security
interests of the United States."
The opposing view, adopted by the 9/11 Commission and endorsed by
Congress last month, is that budget disclosure is an indispensable
precondition to broader accountability and that it is essential to
restoring the credibility of a defective classification system.
But despite the fact that the requirement to disclose the intelligence
budget has finally passed into law, it may not happen after all.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) offered an amendment to the Defense
Appropriations Act on August 4 that would prohibit budget disclosure.
Without any debate, Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) announced that the
amendment was accepted.
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2007_cr/issa.html
The Issa amendment will have to be addressed in a House-Senate
conference before it effectively repeals the new disclosure
requirement.
|
by
Steve A, Federation of American Scientists
Member since:
February 7, 2007 Congress Moves to Block Budget Disclosure
August 06, 2007 01:33 PM EDT
views: 30
|
comments: 9
Tags:
bush,
policy,
classified documents,
secrecy,
foreign policy,
news,
open government,
government,
analysis,
legislation,
congress,
us politics,
intelligence,
legislative branch,
politics,
defense,
cia
To Groups:
Science Policy: by Federation of American Scientists, Gather Politics Essential, politics and international news, Democratic Vision, Global News & Views, Politics Today, Gather News Essential, The Sixties, .....The Bloggers Review....., Left Of The Right, Affairs of the State, Intelligent politics, Political Boxing, Opinionated Opinions, Making A Difference, Free Thinking, Open Debate
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
You might also likeMore by Steve A, Federation of American Scientists |
||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 9
I don't know who is plagiarizing who. If this blogger "watch n wait" isn't you, Steven A, I thought you should know.
Aside from that, it looks like the Issa Amendment only prohibits Department of Defense spending on Intelligence from being disclosed. Budgets of other agencies like the CIA, NSA, etc. are another matter. This is all a big muddled mess. Congress probably did this to maintain the status quo of their respective committees' oversight of the DOD.