I just had The Test. It seems like it was only yesterday. Maybe it was yesterday. The details are fuzzy already. The truth is I can barely remember a thing.
Having just turned 50, I was supposed to have a colonoscopy. Everyone who turns 50 is supposed to have one. There are only a few exceptions to this recommendation, including people who already had a colonoscopy in recent years (and are not yet due for another) or those with medical conditions that reduce the expected benefit of the procedure or increase its risk. For example, doctors caring for an elderly person with severe heart disease might not recommend a routine screening colonoscopy.
The Test is looking for early, curable colon cancer but, just as important (perhaps more important), it is also looking for polyps. One type, called an adenoma (or adenomatous polyp), can become cancerous over many years. Detecting adenomas and removing them through the colonoscope can prevent colon cancer before it occurs.
Even knowing all the reasons I should have it, I dreaded The Test. In fact, I began fretting about it just about the time I turned 49. For a full year, I was whining to myself (and, sometimes, out loud) about how little I was looking forward to it. I even thought about trying to have it early, to get it out of the way. I also thought about skipping it. But how could I turn down a test I knew made medical sense? High quality studies provide powerful evidence that people who have routine screening colonoscopies live longer colon-cancer-free than those who skip The Test. In addition, I wanted to avoid the “do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do” hypocrisy I’d be guilty of if I didn’t have a test I’d recommended to so many of my own patients.
So, why was I dreading it so much? Here’s why: I had heard The Stories.
The Stories did not come from medical textbooks or scientific journals. No, the official, authoritative medical sources make it perfectly clear: I should stop whining and just have The Test.
The Stories that gave me pause came from friends and family who had gone down this road before me. There was the aunt who vomited for hours the night before. She was trying to keep down “The Prep” (more on this in a moment). Between the vomiting and the prohibition from eating solid food, she became weak and dizzy, and had to receive intravenous fluids at a local emergency room. There was the friend who had so much pain during the procedure it had to be stopped. He had to have The Test again a few weeks later. And, I’d heard stories here in the hospital that made me worry: though significant complications of colonoscopy are rare - on the order of 1 in 1000 or less - they do occur. I knew of at least one patient in recent months who had a routine colonoscopy and reported to our emergency room 24 hours later with a perforated bowel requiring emergency surgery.
It seemed to me I had plenty to squirm about: a significant investment of time, inconvenience, the unpleasant preparation, hunger, discomfort and danger. Was all of this really necessary?
As it turned out, I needn’t have worried so much. Here’s what actually happened:
- The day before The Test, I could only drink liquids. This included broth, clear juices, and popsicles. I ate a lot of popsicles.
- That afternoon (still the day before The Test), The Prep began. I took four laxative pills all at once and a few hours later, I began drinking “GoLYTELY,” (a prescription drink designed to clean out the colon). I was supposed to drink one 8-ounce glass every 10 to 15 minutes until I’d ingested a gallon of the stuff. It did not taste great and had an odd, slightly oily consistency. For me, the worst part was trying to force down that much liquid when I wasn’t thirsty.
- The next few hours were spent “indisposed.” Let’s just say I was well-served by the advice of others who suggested I not wander far from a restroom. The good news was that this colon cleansing process was complete in just a few hours. I went back to being hungry—and was still only allowed clear liquid.
- The next morning, I had my black coffee (thank goodness that was allowed!) but nothing more for several hours prior to the time of The Test. I arrived at the outpatient procedure center where I was one of several people each hour having The Test. I put on a gown, answered some basic medical questions, signed a waiver, and had an intravenous catheter placed in my arm. Thankfully, the nurse used a novocaine-type medicine to numb the skin first.
- I chatted with the nurses about how Katie Couric’s televised colonoscopy had done more to make The Test more mainstream and more popular than any doctor could. At that point I first met the physician who would actually perform The Test. Soon after that, the “conscious sedation” was injected into the catheter, and it all goes blank. I literally cannot recall being touched by the colonoscopy or any other instrument. If I had pain, I recall nothing about it. (This raises an interesting question, a bit like a tree falling in the woods: If I had pain but have no memory of it, was it really pain? Does it “count”?)
- I remember dozing in the recovery area, awakening about an hour later as if it were a new day. I got dressed and my wife drove me home. I vaguely recall someone saying “everything looked fine in there.” I was handed the doctor’s card and told to email him in five days to find out the results of the biopsy. The biopsy? What biopsy?
Five days later, I emailed my gastroenterologist, who called me back and said everything was normal. He also said I should do this again in ten years. Immediately I started to worry, but then I caught myself and realized I should be relieved that the biopsy was normal, not worried about getting another painless test in a decade. My experience is much more typical than the horror stories I’d heard during the months before my assigned test date. And I’d forgotten stories about uneventful tests others had.
On one hand, The Test is not “nothing,” as many doctors might suggest (especially those who have never had The Test themselves!). But it’s also not an enormous or tortuous undertaking, as it may seem when you first hear about it. My advice is this: when your time comes, schedule The Test, follow the instructions to the letter and ask questions. But then have The Test. When I turn 60, I’ll do it again - with much less dread.
What have you heard about colonoscopy? Have you had one before? Was it better or worse than you expected? Let me know!
Robert H. Shmerling, M.D. is an Associate Physician at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. He is also a Senior Medical Editor for Harvard Health Publications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click here to join the group Harvard Med: Talking About Health
Advice to make a colonoscopy easier
Is there an age limit for colonoscopy?


Comments: 24
So I will ponder your advice a little longer -
The absolute worst part of the whole thing is the day before when you have to fast and empty out your colon by drinking some awful concoction. You definitely need to be close to a bathroom.
The procedure itself takes just a few minutes and goes by very quickly... as does the little colon-cam they run down you. I really enjoyed watching the inside of my colon and if you stay awake you also recover from the anesthesia more quickly. You can't feel a thing and the docs make you feel very comfy about them peering up your behind.
If my mom hadn't had gotten the cancer I prolly would've put this procedure off for years... which by then would have been too late to catch any cancer. That's exaclty what my mom did. She never got a colonoscopy and died too young from a slow growing cancer that has the highest recovery rate... if you catch it early by getting colonoscopies when you're supposed to.
So people, please don't put this procedure off, it's no biggie and it can save your life. And women, if you're already getting annual mammograms you won't mind a colonoscopy at all. If you don't count the day you have to void your bowels there's absolutely no pain or discomfort at all.
As I began to float to La-La Land I was told that "Doctor Herman will be with you in just a moment."
I waited, my exposed pink butt parked in the air.
Into the room walked a woman in her thirties, with long brunette hair. Her white hospital cloak couldn't hide the rich, womanly body underneath. She was a knockout.
"Hi! I'm Doctor Herman!"
"Oh, God, no!"
"What's the matter?"
"You are FEMALE! You are BEAUTIFUL!"
She seemed flustered. "I, uh, am female. Can't deny that. But about the other . . . well . . .."
"Look, I'm drugged and I know it. But I also know you are a woman. You are much too young and much too beautiful to be doing THIS to me!"
Dr. Herman waved her hand dismissively. "Oh, you have no reason to be embarrassed!"
"Oh, but I do. I am a man 'of a certain age,' and I'm not used to this!"
"Don't worry," she said. "I do this procedure all the time."
"Well," I said, "I suppose that all men look like assholes to you."
At that, Doctor Herman did something with the drip. I'll never know what, for I got even more floaty after that, but I figure she concluded she better dial up the drugs to shut me up.
(my husband, who is older than I, is NOT going to thank you though)
Current guidelines recommend a screening colonoscopy at age 50. If the results are normal, it should be repeated every 10 years. However, earlier and more frequent screens make sense in certain situations. These include the presence of symptoms (such as bleeding), prior polyps or cancer, inflammatory bowel disease (such as Crohn's Disease), or a strong family history of colon cancer or polyps. Talk to your doctor about your particular situation and when screening colonoscopies should begin.
Having someone close to you suffer a serious complication is not easy to put aside when you're thinking about having that same test yourself. But, you're right – serious complications are quite rare. Meanwhile, colon cancer is fairly common.
And, you're smart not to wait for your doctor to recommend it – if you've never had the test, ask your doctor about it.
Dreading the bowel-cleansing preparation may be worse than actually taking it. While no one would suggest that the preparation is pleasant, chances are good that you'll be able to tolerate it. Good luck!
I'm sorry to hear about your mother. But, you did the right thing to get screened and for precisely the reasons you mention: early detection of a small, slow-growing cancer provides an excellent chance for cure. And detection (and removal) of polyps can prevent colon cancer from developing in the first place. Your suggestion about requesting the first appointment of the morning is a good one: the sooner it's over, the sooner things can get back to normal.
Clearly, each person's experience is a bit different – some people have a much tougher time with the colonoscopy than you (or I) had. I've spoken to others who, like you, enjoyed watching the procedure on the monitor. My own preference was not to watch; I'd much rather sleep through whole thing!
Keep pondering! And if you let your doctors know about how groggy you were after your procedures, perhaps they can adjust the anesthesia so that your sedation won't last so long.
What have you heard about colonoscopy? YES
Have you had one before? Yes, I had one at the age of 40
Was it better or worse than you expected? I htated it. I remember everything, I was not put to sleep only made a tad sleepy. They even turned the screen so I could see everything the Dr saw. It was very interesting but I dread having it again.
Thanks for your comments. It's disappointing to hear that your experience with colonoscopy was not good. But I'm guessing the next time might be better. When you are due for another one, share your experience with the doctors who will be performing the procedure and providing anesthesia. If you prefer not to watch the action, let them know! And, as with Cristina above, it may be possible for you to receive a different dose or different drug for anesthesia so that you are not so aware of what is going on.
I suppose that vile liquid is required so the doctor can get a better picture and be able
to see well to remove polyps or biopsy whatever is required.
Just imagine, you've only just begun.
Thanks for the added personal advice. I am a firm believer that Knowledge Is Power. After reading your article, I had already decided to do just that. I used to just go along with everything that my Doctor said, without question. I am no longer like that. I take an active part in my health. I ask questions and go to the Dr appointment with a list in hand. I then come home do research on the internet. Doctors are just so busy these days that a patient needs to be on top of things when it comes to their health.
You are correct. The reason for the bowel-cleansing procedure is to allow the doctors looking through the colonoscope to clearly see the lining of the colon. A good "prep" is essential to performing an adequate test. If the prep isn't good, the test may have to be repeated. As unpleasant as the prep may be, it's even worse if you have to do it again! That's why it's worth following the instructions carefully.
That was two years and 4 months ago. The cancer has spread to her lungs, her spleen, her liver, and to her abdomen where a tumor has taken up permanent residence.
My sister is dying. She has a year, maybe two, an off chance of three.
No one knows how terrible colon cancer is unless you have it or watch someone with it. No control of your bowels, a bag that sits on your stomach that you have to clean, and if you have diarrhea it's a real mess. Oh yeah, and most insurance companies will only allow you to have ten bags a month so you have to reuse them. And I won't go into detail about the smell.
A few minutes of embarrassment and discomfort is much better than a few years of having colon cancer.