For anyone who has ever read a biographical description of Jane Austen, it is a wonder that she never wrote anything under the title of 'A Room of One's Own'. Although eventually, 1929, Virginia Woolf does examine the life of Austen, along with others under said title. In 2003 Jon Spence tries to delve further into the Austen mystique with 'Becoming Jane Austen' of which the 2007 movie, 'Becoming Jane' was based. Unlike the movie which focuses on an alleged romance of which the major evidence for its existence is innuendo, 'Becoming Jane Austen' covers the Austen family a few generations before Jane is even born, but ends abruptly as soon as she dies in 1817. I do wish more detail was given in this regard.
I confess that as a reviewer of this book, I started to read it during chemo when it was difficult to read anything that required the focus above that of a child in a candy shop. Suffice to say I have read this book in chunks. Although I have enjoyed it, and would recommend it, my total recall of it is incomplete.
The one thing that has struck me about the earlier part of the book is how the social structure of British families of the Austen economic/cultural class seems so different from that of today (and I don't think that is just because I am American that it seems a bit odd). A generation or two before Jane was born some of her family tree had money, and if I remember correctly a title. The particular man with the bulk of the inheritance had no children so he went to the siblings of either his wife or himself and picked out a boy then legally adopted the child after a financial arrangement had been agreed upon. The crux of the situation, as if selling one of your children to a relative doesn't seem strange enough, was that the boy was not to have any contact with his biological mother or siblings. Oh no, this wasn't done in order for the lad to not know he is adopted, the kid was already younger school age, this was done so that when he inherited he wouldn't squander the money on helping his family of origin. I know what you are thinking; when is Disney going to make a fun for all the family film out of this?
Jane Austen spent her childhood in a family of six boys and one sister. Her father was a rector who also taught students that the Austens then boarded. If the family had not so many children they would have been prosperous, but as it was money was tight and as described above, some of the Austen children visited wealthier relatives in hopes of gaining some favor...or an adoption. Overall, Jane grew up in a family that valued each other's company and encouraged her with her writing if for no other reason, but to entertain themselves.
As far as the romance that inspired the movie, if that is the reason you pick up this book then you are going to be severely irritated. As I remember the movie there is a huge climax that involved the choice of love versus uncertainty and possible poverty - in literary form it is not so near exciting.
I have to admit that I did feel vindicated once the book delves into Jane Austen's novels. A few years ago I wrote a harsh review about how one of those numerous 'P & P' sequels that are in print had the Darcy daughters commenting about Napoleon. Someone corrected me by saying that the story had been written in the 1790's which would than make the historic events possible - well after all this time all I have to say is HA! When Jane Austen finally started to publish her books she wanted them to be read as current and NOT in the timeframe of when they were originally written. Thank you Jane Austen and Jon Spence!
'Becoming Jane Austen' is an excellent read that would please not only the most ardent Austen admirers, but also history buffs and women of all stripes. It really is interesting the metamorphosis she goes through in the way she regards her writing. She couldn't help but view how limited her resources were since she was an unmarried woman of a certain social standing. She didn't want to be dependent on her brothers and at the end of her life, when she had some taste of fame, she had some security but even then still lived with uncertainty.
At the end of the book, one of the more interesting things that I took away was how Austen viewed marriage. At the end of some of her popular books marriage seems to be the end of struggle for her young heroines, but as Austen witnessed young women having too many children in too small a time period (sometimes permanently injuring their health) she started to rethink the institution of matrimony. In fact, she made the love interest in her later book, 'Persuasion' a sea captain, because she wanted Captain Wentworth to have a dangerous profession - i.e. a profession as dangerous as marriage was for young women.
Overall, if you are a Jane Austen fan, this book is a must read.
Westerfield © 2009


Comments: 24
And... Thanks for mentioning V. Woolf! : )
I just saw the last part of Sense and Sensibility on PBS last night ...
Lainie, Virginia Woolf is someone I need to read. How can anyone not like ‘P & P’?
Peter, it wasn’t until I posted this article did I realize that Masterpiece Theatre was doing a Jane Austen thing. I wouldn’t have been half watching the Grammys if I knew that.
Shirley, there is little not to love about ‘P & P’.
Sometimes the best stuff is read in chunks, isn't it? I spent the entire summer of 2002 reading Peter Guralnick's Elvis Presley bios, Last Train to Memphis and Careless Love, that way -- it was like my mind tied them into the overall experience of that summer and made them a weird touchstone. I'm getting ready to start Nixonland and have a feeling it'll be the same kind of read.
2) Thank you for posting to this group whose only purpose is to thank you for posting to this group.
3) (Psst..I think you meant "mystique", not "mystic"...sixth sentence, first 'graph).
Bronte Sisters follow close at hand!
C.L. Mareydt 180º
as far that the purchasing of kids, that has been going on through out most of history and has even happened in this country. it was a way to perhaps provide a better life for your kids than you could give them.
I have always been a Jane Austen fan since my 7th grade English teacher started us reading them. I have reread them several times and I find something different or react differently to them each time,....I guess maybe as I age I view them through more 'mature' eyes... but regardless, I have always enjoyed them.
I tend to start reading an author and then try to find all the books I can by that author and read them all one after the other... and that is what I did with JA's - started with Sense and Sensibility; then Pride and Prejudice; Mansfield Park; Emma and Northhanger Abbey. I haven't read Persuasion.
You know, I’ve read some of the Bronte sisters, but I need to read more. I read a fairly good book a few years ago about their lives which was interesting. They sort of lived a Gothic life.
Dame Ruth, thank you. I’m sorry that you can’t read anymore. I know that my concentration was shot I really missed my book companions. Wow, now I feel really melancholy. I will make the necessary changes once I post this comment. Thank you again! You are my best editor!
C.L., what makes her great is how subtle her message is and how universal as well. The fact that she has been gone from this earth for nearly two hundred years and is more popular than ever is a feat that even Shakespeare cannot claim.
C.C., I know it has, but there just is something really cold hearted about trying to sever a child from their family of origin to the degree that if one of the poorer siblings would take ill that the anointed one wouldn’t step up and help. It’s just sad and sort of shocking, but I suppose the same could be said when citizens of first world countries would rather spend tons of money on weapons than help starving children in third world countries.
*Sigh* now I feel doubly melancholy.
Alison, I think you can take your time, the movie is on DVD now.
Sonia, funny you should mention reading it, because she was absent from my generations’ reading lists. Instead I had to suffer through Stephen Crane’s ‘Red Badge of Courage’ three or four times. I think more of the reading for my generation was concentrated on trying to interest boys to read. Dumb stupid boys!
Do read ‘Persuasion’, it was the last book she wrote and one that reflects, according to Spence, the change in her attitude.
Mugg, thank you. I know, I know, you would rather watch the movie version.
I attended an American school in my hometown in Cuba. Our 7th and 8th grade homeroom and English teacher was from Philadelphia and she was the one who got us interested in Jane Austen and the Bronte sisters. She also was instrumental in my reading and finally enjoying Shakespeare, because she would have us read and then take it apart and all the "Hey no ni nos" were easier to digest and understand...
At the same time for Spanish Lit we had a great professor who put us through Miguel de Cervante's Don Quijote which is really funnier in Spanish than when I reread it in English and also all the stories and poems about El Cid....by the time we got out of the 8th grade we were pretty well grounded in literature, both English and Spanish.
I have to confess that I have never read ‘Northhanger Abbey’. I tried to read it in a rainforest once, but that is a whole different tale. I saw the movie and I just couldn’t get over the cousin romance. Yes, I know it was common back in that day, but still.
Kathryn, thank you. I saw it briefly and thought Jane looked very becoming.