Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, the final volume in the Harry Potter series is one of the most anticipated books of the upcoming year. Author J.K. Rowling has just announced the official publication date, which is July 21, 2007.
Ms. Rowling has already suggested that there will be at least one death in Book 7, and there are many issues and questions that still need to be answered. At Borders, we're especially curious about one character, sure to play a central role in Harry's final year at Hogwarts.
Severus Snape: Friend or Foe?
Snape is a powerful and gifted wizard who possesses a ruthless and cunning wit, is rarely caught off guard by any comment or insult and often leaves his verbal combatants with little to say. His allegiances are a mystery however. Is he loyal to Dumbledore and a friend to Harry Potter? Or is Snape loyal to Voldemort, and a foe of Harry Potter?
Here's some questions we have about Snape
Snape is a Friend
1. In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, why did Snape attempt to protect Harry from Professor Quirrell?
2. Why didn’t Snape go to the graveyard immediately upon being summoned by Voldemort in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire?
3. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, why did Snape alert the Order of the Phoenix that Harry was facing danger at the ministry?
4. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, why did Snape agree to teach Harry Occumency?
5. Dumbledore tells Harry he trusts Snape in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and again it is implied in Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. Would Dumbledore, the most powerful wizard of his time, misplace his trust in Snape?
6. Why does Snape spare Harry’s life in Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince?
Snape is a Foe
1. Beginning with Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, Snape displays a dislike of Harry. Is a childhood grudge against his father reason enough to hate Harry or is it something more?
2. Why was Snape so set on expelling Harry from Hogwarts in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets?
3. In Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, what were Snape and Karkaroff conspiring about?
4. Knowing the danger Harry faced, why did Snape continue to goad Sirius in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix?
5. In Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, what were Snape’s motives for his Unbreakable Vow with Narcissa?
6. And of course, there is the major question of Snape and Dumbledore in Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. We'll leave out the details for anyone that may not have yet read the books.
What do you think? Friend or foe?
Mary GrandPré © 2005 Warner Bros.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is coming July 21, 2007. Theories abound on the significant Book. Discuss your predictions and theories, and read about all-things Potter in Borders' Harry Potter Gazette at BordersSnape.gather.com.



Comments: 463
I think that Snape is either a foe or before the beginning he was put under such an Imperious curse that by the time it was lifted, he did not remember himself being put under the curse to join Voldemort, but as a faithful lifelong servant from which position he wished not to withdraw.
1) Snape does not appear at Voldemorts return because they don't want to blow the cover
2)Snape
3)is
4)EVIL!!!!
5)face
6)it!!!
I definitely agree with bren s. I just can't believe that Dumbledore would be so naiive as to put his trust in a villain. Dumbledore trusts Snape for good reason, and I believe Dumbledore and Snape planned the death scene to show Snape's "allegiance" to Voldemort. Snape will help Harry overthrow Voldemort.
I also agree that Dumbledore is an animagus, and that his animal is a Phoenix. He can be killed, but he will rise from his ashes and live again, just as a Phonenix does.
im liking the animagus thing- haveing him as a pheonix explains why he has lived for so long.
but i just dont think its possible. they had his body, and fawkes LEFT after the funeral(FUNERAL=DEAD BODY=DEAD, sry guys) dumbledore would not have left, he would have come to help harry
Why did Snape kill Dumbledore?
The original actor who played Dumbledore died. Perhaps JK wanted to keep things true to the original actor, and said, "Oh! No more Dumby!" Anyone think of that? No secret plan, no divine nature?
And sticking with that thought, I disagree that Dumbledore will come back. If the original actor is gone, can't exactly dig him up, now can we?
If anyone is coming back, I'm saying that Sirius will.
So my final vote? Dunno. I'm teetering towards foe, but hey. Who knows. But I still don't think that there was any divine plan as to why Snape killed Dumby. He just did.
Like many people, I agree that while Dumbledore can certainly make mistakes, this was not one of them. I think that Snape sees some of himself in Draco (pulled to the dark side, but not yet one of them) and he and Dumbledore worked this out to keep Draco from making that last, irrevocable move toward evil. Dumbledore may have known that drinking the liquid would kill him and he asked for Snape because he knew that he didn't have time and they would have to force a confrontation...he revived on seeing the dark mark out of fear for his students and because he knew he didn't have to hold on much longer.
I would like to point out that upon further reading, Snape did not use an unforgivable curse on Dumbledore. He said the words, but the effect was not the same as any other time Aveda Kedavra has been used. Dumbledore was not enveloped in green light as he dropped dead...sparks flew and he was knocked off the tower. Snape doesn't, couldn't, hate Dumbledore enough to use an unforgivable curse on him. Dumbledore is the one person who truly, completely, believes in him and I think the hatred and raw emotion on Snape's face is because he couldn't do what he needed to, what he'd promised Dumbledore, and if Voldemort and the deatheaters look closely instead of crowing over Dumbledore's death they will see that discrepancy. He has to feel that not only has he blackened his name, the shreds of his honor, forever...he wasn't even able to do it right.
However, he hates Harry. Not only does Harry seem to represent all that he despised in James it must seem like Harry is a lucky braggart when it's Snape who has to live as a double agent, trusted by no one, Snape who has to get his hands dirty and do things he loathes, pretend to be an ally to people he hates and wonder if he's really like them after all. Harry gets all the glory and Snape does all the work. And, he has to put up with Harry's scorn on top of it. It's interesting how much nastier Snape has gotten once Voldemort came back. Piling grief on Harry is not only a relief for the bile and stress, but it's one that both Voldemort and Dumbledore will be fine with. It just might be the only way Snape has to vent his spleen. (Not that it makes it right)
Snape is the best and most interesting character in the book and I'm curious to see how it works out in the last one.
I think the last book might be more about Severus Snape than Harry Potter.
Harry has this scar, he survived the attack on his family, he always knows when Voldy is near because the scar burns. And Voldy might well know that Harry is near, because when the scar is burning, it's calling out to Voldy like the Ring did to the Wraiths in LotR.
And why did he survive in the first place!?
Why? What made HIM so special? Maybe he wasn't MEANT to die! Maybe Voldy knew he was growing weak, so he sealed off the last of him in Harry, for him to come get later like leftovers!
I hated that she had to resort to killing off her characters in Goblet of Fire and following books. She should stick to the fascinating character development that were so enticing throughout the series: Mad Eye Moody (althouth only an imposter) was a great addition to the series. Gilderoy Lockhart ditto (although the movie version was weak there). And we all love to hate Lucius and Drco, although they are REALLY evil at the end of book six. Maybe a bit of shock should come in the form of discrediting those we have trusted...Prof McG? Ron? Ron's mom? Hermione's dad? It would be more interesting than 'exit stage left PERMANENTLY'
I don't think Snape is a friend...it takes to much imagination to pull that off.
Dumbledor is also not an animagus - if he was there would have been no body to bury. Dumbledor left a body that was seen by many people, if he was an animagus, he would have just turned into the animal (like peter petigrew).
The only person that I can think of that might be killed off is Harry. Can't have someone resurrecting JK Rowlings books if the main character is gone, now can they?
Yes, I think Snape is evil. I believe everything he told to Narcissa during that chapter with the Unbreakable Vow. But who knows, maybe he'll have an ulterior motive and end up betraying both Harry and Voldemort. Maybe he wants to finish off Dumbledore AND Voldemort, for reasons everyone will guess at but no one will expect.
I also believe that everyone is right in the aspect that he did have a crush on Harry's mother. It's probably half the reason he hated James so much. He hates Harry because in him he sees the man that made his life a living hell, and the women that ignored him and married the man who made his life a living hell.
Why does everyone think the death scene was staged? Honestly, I think the reason Dumbledore was acting the way he did with Draco and Snape was that he knew Draco didn't have it in him to kill, and Dumbledore thought Snape didn't either. And maybe a part of Snape didn't, which is why he probably only sent out sparks and not a full blast. A part of him, against his will, started to trust Dumbledore.
It's like Snape said, Dumbledore's weakness is his ability to trust people too much.
I agree that his hand would have eventually killed him off though, and I totally support the idea that he's like the Pheonix and will rise again from the ashes. Maybe he'll rise hundreds of years later, after everyone in the story has moved on, but I do believe a powerful wizard like him will come back.
snapes not just bad, he is severly evil...and sinful, he loves the dark arts more than anything...i believe he hates james for sooo many reasons...not only for the bullying...not only for marrying lilly...wich snape had a love hate relationship with...
i believe he told dracos mothr the truth in hbp, and he hates dumbledor for being an naive old man, and holding him back...
snape killed dumbledor when dumbledor was of his guard, dumbledor died for his mistake, and he has told us again and gain that even he the wisest of wisards do make mistakes, i do not believe harry dies...then again this may just be my own wishfull thinking, there are alot of us here on this board...
sure would be great to have siriurs,dumbledor,james and lilly all back and alive again...but then you should look up some childish happy ending storybook...thats not harry p.
i think its tme harry grows up..faces its not a happy happy world where ppl come back to life, and goes on, he has a job to do, find the soulthingymajiggys destroy them...kill mr bad guy then go home and try to make a decent life for himself...end of story...
Friend.
1. Why did snape protect Harry From Quirrell? Dumbledore states that James saved Snapes life once...and now Snape has repaid the favor. "He can go on happily hating the memory of James" is how Dumbledore(Rowling) puts it in the book. Which would make sense.
2. Why didn't Snape go to the graveyard immediately upon being summoned by Voldemort? A. you cannot apparate/disapparate on the Hogwarts grounds (Stated several times in the books) If he's evil and really working for Voldemort but pretending to work for Dumbledore he cant just leave without explination. It would blow his cover...now my question is...why wasnt he punished from Voldemort for not returning right away like everyone else was??
3.In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, why did Snape alert the Order of the Phoenix that Harry was facing danger at the ministry? Well...I'm not sure I have a response for this one...
4.4. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, why did Snape agree to teach Harry Occulmency? He states in the kitchen of Grimmauld place he doesnt have a choice, it isnt like he jumped for the job. He is probably one of the only teachers aside from Dumbledore who can do it. And we all know Dumbledore was "avoiding" Harry. My question for this question...How do you know he wasnt "Opening" Harry's mind a bit further for these dreams? (Ron/Rowling also state)
5.Dumbledore tells Harry he trusts Snape in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and again it is implied in Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. Would Dumbledore, the most powerful wizard of his time, misplace his trust in Snape? Dumbledore states that he's an old man that makes foolish mistakes. Everyone makes mistakes even a powerful brilliant wizard. I think that there is a missing peice of that puzzle. Something that comes out in 7...why dumbledore trusts Snape...but for now I still think evil.
6.Why does Snape spare Harry's life in Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince? DUH!! Voldemort keeps saying "The boy is mine" "Leave the boy for me" If Snape did kill Harry Voldemort wouldnt be happy because he cant fulfill his prophecy...Snape's name isnt in the Prophecy...
Foe
1.Beginning with Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, Snape displays a dislike of Harry. Is a childhood grudge against his father reason enough to hate Harry or is it something more? I think the childhood grudge is a deep part of it. Harry looks exactly like his father...(Other than the eyes of course) something Snape now has to see everyday and remember the childhood he'd never go back to? Then working for Voldemort would make him hate Harry even more...the child that defeated the dark lord?
2.Why was Snape so set on expelling Harry from Hogwarts in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets? Again I think just mostly the whole he wouldnt have to look at Harry and remember James anymore. Plus Harry wouldnt be so protected if he wasnt at Hogwarts anymore...and then Tom Riddle would have been brought back full force by the life of Ginny Weasley...
3. In Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, what were Snape and Karkaroff conspiring about?... Um...the dark mark....why its growing stronger....do they have anything to worry about?
4.Knowing the danger Harry faced, why did Snape continue to goad Sirius in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix? Because the childhood grudge never left...they've always hated each other Sirius(Rowling) states "Snape and James hated each other the moment they laid eyes on each other...Snape envied the dark arts something James loathed and James was everything Snape wanted to be: handsome, smart, funny, a quidditch player...etc."
5. In Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, what were Snape's motives for his Unbreakable Vow with Narcissa? I've heard people state that they think Snape was in love with Lilly Evans/Potter...but personally I think he's in love with Narcissa...he was happy to see her...he protects her son....even tho he's a git!
So all in all I think my assumption is he's bad. All things point towards... it...he's even hiding the bad guy in his house in book 6!! If he were truly on Dumbledore's side he should have turned Wormtail in...but it wouldnt make a difference now that Sirius is gone :'( Part of me wishes that I could say he is good. I like the character...just as I like Draco's character...but all in all...the conclusion is bad.
"At Borders, we're especially curious about one character, sure to play a central role in Harry's final year at Hogwarts."
Whoever wrote that must not have read the Half Blood Prince. At the end, he tells Ron and Hermione that he is not going back.
On the topic though, I do believe Snape is a friend. He had many chances to kill Harry, and never did. I do believe Dumbledore and Snape had a plan. I don't know if Dumbledore will actually come back physically, but in all of the books, they have the portraits of the Headmasters/mistresses who are there to assist the current Headmaster/mistress. And those who did great things were allowed more than one portrait that they could move between. I think Dumbledore will manifest in this way to help Harry with the last of the horcruxes.
Petrino- You say Dumbledore wasn't on his guard. How? If anything he was more on guard. He removed all the safeguards so he could rush to the castle. If anything, he was more on guard than not. And I am pretty sure Harry accepted a long time ago he doesn't live in a happy world at all.
Also, Wilder B brought up fawkes. Why didnt fawkes show up to help dumbledore when he was so weak, but had showed up in the past to help Harry.
Remember though, dumbledore can still show up in paintings to help guide Harry. If he doesn't that will be a major let down and blooper in the book, and I will be disappointed. Why? all the other paintings spoke and gave out advice and whatnot.
I also don't think that Harry will be a horcrux, because if he is, then he's destined to die. Granted, there is some evidence that could prove Harry to be a horcrux (the scar, the whole "Harry can feel when Voldemort is near" thing), but if he is then he's destined to die, and I think that makes a horribly anti-climactic ending to a great book series, and for some reason, I think Rowling would like to make this one REALLY count. The only reason I can think of for her killing Harry off would be so that she wouldn't be hassled to write more books for the series, and personally I wouldn't blame her for putting that kind of finality into the ending of the series. I wouldn't want to be poked and prodded to keep writing on a series I felt to be finished.
But at any rate, I don't think Snape is a friend, although don't quote me on that. I don't believe (or don't want to believe) that Harry is a horcrux, for the one reason that it would make for flat and horribly anti-climactic literature. So far these are my only theories/generalizations, but I'm still brainstorming!
And I do like some of the theories above me: they're quite intriguing!! :-D
HOWEVER, if you will remember back in one of the book Harry had been trying to learn to do spells MENTALLY without a wand. Dumbledore could have fought back that way----> that is, if he hadn't just been poisoned and left weak.
Hogwarts WILL reopen. Yes, parents will withdraw their children, thinking it isn't a safe place, but in actuality, it's the safest place.
The Ministry will see to it that it becomes a fortress in itself, and the children will all be safe. It's like...The show must go on. Dumby wouldn't want the school to close down after his death, and there will be some relization by someone of that fact, and McGonagall will open the school with the Ministry's protection.
As for Harry not coming back? Bull. He'll be back. Probably not at the beginning of the school year, but McGonagall is gonna come see him or something and talk h im into returning because they need him there for some reason. A beacon of light or something. A hope for the kids. Who knows.
All in all, Hogwarts will open, Harry will be back, and I hope Sirius, too.
I hope that she doesn't kill off Harry, because even if Voldemort is killed in book seven they will still have lord knows how many horcruxes (Dumbledore said seven but as long as she wanted to keep writing it could be endless.) Voldemort made & couldn't as each one came about they could make more? Harry should become an Auror.
Then again Snape could be as slippery as His Oily Hair be evil and Rowling could be just as slippery and put in all the clues that Snape must be acting on Dubledore's behalf just to fool us...
^_^
no effense
I think he is a friend. I think that Dumbledore and Snape discussed what he would do once Voldemort returned. At the end of book 4, I think it was pretty clear that Snape was supposed to become a spy again. In book 6, when Snape enters into the Unbreakable Vow, he says he will watch over Draco and protect him, which is exactly what he does. Maybe that's part of the reason Draco couldn't kill Dumbledore. Dumbledore knew that's what he would be asked to do, and that's why he wanted Snape to watch over him, too. Snape and Dumbledore knew that Snape would have to kill Dumbledore, but Dumbledore knew he'd be dying anyway, so he figured better to have Snape do it and be trusted among the enemy than to have Draco do it and become evil.
I think Snape did what he did at Dumbledore's orders. Dumbledore was badly injured in the beginning of Half Blood Prince. Dumbledore told Harry that if it weren't for Snape he would have died then. I suspect that whatever Snape did, he was unable to cure him and only postponed Dumbledore's inevitable death. If Dumbledore knew that it was only a matter of time before the effects of Snape's help wore off, he might have asked Snape to finish it for him so that Snape could prove to Voldemort that he was on his side and gain an advantage as a spy. When Narcissa shows up to ask Snape for help, he said that he already knew of the plan for Malfoy. He would have told Dumbledore of it if he were spying on Voldemort which would explain why he made the unbreakable vow to finish the job for Malfoy. Dumbledore would have wanted to protect Malfoy from being forced to commit the act and become evil. I even think that Harry witnessing the event was planned. I think Dumbledore knew more about what Malfoy was up to then he let on and that the timing of taking Harry with him on the same night that Malfoy succeeded in repairing the vanishing cabinet was not an accident. Voldemort is an excellent legilimans and in spite of Snape trying to teach Harry how to block him from 'reading' his thoughts, Harry is not any good at it. So unless Harry was completely convinced that Snape is evil, Voldemort would never believe it either. In fact it would be better for everyone in the Order to believe it too so that no one would tip Voldemort off that it was planned if they were captured.
I'm sure that Dumbledore is really dead, but I'm also sure that Dumbledore will return in the next book because he already had returned at the end of the last one. He was 'asleep' in his portrait in the headmasters office while Harry was talking to the new Headmistress McConnegal. That couldn't have happened unless he really was dead.
Snape, on the other hand, is going to be more of a foe. He seems to be rather powerful and is disguising it from one and all, including those at Hogwarts and Voldormort. I have the feeling that if there is a life and death situation coming down, I think Snape will kill both Voldormort and Harry and take over. Although I have a feeling that Snape truly knows the dangers of the dark side and knows he will probably be hunted down like a rabbid wolf if he were to become the new dark lord.
Does anyone remember Harry saving Doby? Will Doby unit the house elves in support Harry against the death eaters. Dumbledore stated in book two that elf magic is very powerful. How powerful is this magic?
I also belive that Hermione Granger will become a pawn because she wants to protect her parents from the death eaters. We all know what death eaters like to do with muggles and she knows this and has witnesses their actions at the World Cup. Because of this, I believe she will sell out Harry in order to save them. Ron will unfortuately be killed off in fighting.
i also don't want harry, hermione, or ron to die..
on an unrelated note...
it seems as though harry acts like tom riddle in book 3. he was attacking sirius black when crookshanks tried to protect him(sirius). harry thought that he didn't care if he had to kill crookshanks as long as he could kill black. he thought that crookshanks was being stupid, just as voldemort had thought of harry's mother right before he killed her. Also, did harry even know of any killing spells or know how to use them at that time? i dont know...anyway...
they have the same thing inside the wands. That is the only way to get rid of
Voldemort. Snape will help Harry .
but if harry dies... that would devastate a lot of people... probably even me.
o.O
I nearly fell off my chair when Dumbledore died, but I agree with Spencer F. that "dead is dead" and Dumbledore sacrificd himslef to protect Harry. Snape is, however conflicted about Harry, going to do his part in bringing about the end of Valdemort. I do believe that Snape will try and protect him, by working undercover with Valdemort (now that he can prove to the death eaters that he *is* one of *them* again and can join their ranks).
I do *not* believe that Harry will make it to his 18th brthday. Part of Harry's being is intertwined with Valdemort's ~ I don't believe that Valdemort could ever be truly dispatched if Harry is still alive. Harry may have to use the lesson taught by dear, dear Dumbledore, and sacrifice himself to rid the world of Valdemort.
I pre-ordered my book today; I'm sad that this wonderful story is about to conclude.
In the end however, Snape is not evil and Dumbledore was correct at putting his trust in him.
Dumbledore is dead....for real. Snape is good....for real....and Harry will die in the end. Snape, knowing that killing Harry will destroy the last part of "He Who Shall Not Be Named" will end up having to kill Harry (at Harry's request) and that's how they will destroy Voldemort. Unfortunately, someone will misunderstand Snape's true intentions and kill Snape before they realize why he was doing this and he will also get killed. I predict a very bleak and dark ending......very "William Shakespear" if you will.....
.. a friend told me he believed that its the mirror of erised.. because, if you look at the description, on the bottom of the mirror has a symbol a clawed feet. maybe?
.. just a thought..
i think it would be hilarious if jk rowling makes harry die. its what almost everyone is suspecting, but she thinks it will be this big surpise. if she doesnt make him die i will have a lot more respect for her....
I'm still on the fence about Severus. However, seeing as he is a talented occlumens (for lack of a better word, mind-reader), my thoughts are that while on the tower, he was able to see into Dumbledore's head. I believe he saw how the "drink" Dumbledore had consumed in the cave was causing him to go mad, and that it would not stop until it had consumed his consciousness and drove him so crazy he would die. Whether or not Snape is evil had nothing to do with what he did next; I think it was uncomfortable mercy that led Snape to euthanize Dumbledore before the poison painfully and utterly consumed him. Snape was actually trying to do Dumbledore a 'favor', with the unintended benefit of fulfilling his "unbreakable vow" made with Narcissa Malfoy at the beginning of the book.
Evidence of the effects of this poison can be found during a seemingly-insignificant conversation that took place at the Phoenix headquarters; there had been a question posed about whether anyone had ever tried to leave the Death Eaters. In fact, Regulus Black, one of Sirius' family members, had made a past attempt. Linking that information with the note Harry found in the fake locket from the watery cave, one can surmise that it was Regulus himself who first drank the poison in an attempt to find and destroy Voldemort's horcrux (the note inside indicated the initials R.A.B.: Regulus Black). Unfortunately for Regulus, he was found dead days after his departure from the Death Eaters and presumably, also days after drinking the solution surrounding the locket.
This brings me to my next point: Harry as a horcrux. I believe after hearing the partial-prophecy, Voldemort instincts would have led him to destroy the child who threatened his existence, not carefully plan and plot another horcrux. Remember, at this early point in the saga, Harry was an unknown with no importance whatsoever. Voldemort could not forsee Harry's future significance to the wizarding world, and consequently the thought of placing a portion of his soul into Harry would not have even entered his mind.
Further evidence contrary to the idea of Harry being a horcrux revolves around the old magic Lily Potter used on her son during Voldemort's attack. As we've been told, her ancient magic protected young Harry like a shield. Therefore, any spell rebounding off of Harry and onto the original spell-caster would have to perform the original spell. Considering this assumption, had Voldemort's spell been intended to turn Harry into a horcrux, wouldn't Voldemort have turned into a horcrux himself? However, he did not maintain his physical body (as a horcrux would), so readers must deduce that the original spell was, in fact, the avadakedavra curse.
Anyway, that's the way I see it...
Dumbledore is alive yes alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Before each Harry Potter book comes out, there are always people who will try to turn theories they've concocted into fact, or even those who will simply create rumors for the fun of it. Currently, there are a few about Book 7 and below you can find the ones which JKR has debunked.
Character Information
-Dumbledore is really dead. He is not in hiding and is not coming back.
T-here will be no character named "Icicle," and JK said that she didn't recall saying there ever would be
-Dumbledore is not Harry's relative
-Harry is not related to Voldemort and he is not related to Salazar Slytherin
-Lily Potter is not alive
-Lily was not a Death Eater
-Crookshanks is not an Animagus
-Neville is not the son of Peter Pettigrew
-Remus Lupin does not have a twin brother
-Petunia is not a Squib
-Dumbledore is not Harry/Ron from the future
-Mrs Norris/Crookshanks will not be discovered as an Animagus
those are the main ones. now thank you victoria. while this does not discontinue the horcrux theory it does completly put the "dumbloredore rising" to rest. harry is nnot a horcrux for several reasons. many of you do not realize the point of a horcrux. it splits up the soul in order to keep the "person" alive if the piece they contain is destroyed by death. voldemort doesnt know if all the horcruxes have been destroyed. in the latest book dumbledore states that voldemort might not even know when they are destroyed. also, voldemort has no intention of dying, if he kills harry he could be killing himself, and he is not willing to do this. if he killed harry he would not recieve a piece of his soul back, he would destrory it. it will ultimatly come down to harry vs. voldemort. but this will come after all the other horcruxes are destroyed, which will take up the majority of the book. of this i am sure. in the final showdown snape will most likely sacrafice himself to help harry kill voldemort. this is my final prediction.
if harry is one of the horcrux, then why would voldermort stupidly want to kill harry? unless, there is something else in store..
The ideas Debby L. proposes for his future are so horribly anticlimatic -
I just hope the final book is as good as the first six. I do hate to see it end.
Why would he want to kill Harry? No idea. Maybe it's a kill-or-be-killed situation. I mean, sure, it would suck to kill one of your horcruxes, but it would suck even more to be just dead.
Snape is a good guy, basically for all the reasons that everyone's listed. He and Dumbledore had his death planned out, they just didn't know when specifically. In HBP, there is a small part where Harry catches a conversation where Snape and Dumbledore are arguing, and Dumbledore is making Snape promise to stick to a plan he didn't want to do...
JK's a genius.