It was Mr. Darcy with his knickers down to his knees accompanied by Lydia Bennett in his private bedchamber. Since it seems as if Jane Austen is everywhere in current culture, primarily because everything she wrote, along with herself as a writer, is now part of the public domain. Now, with the aid of Stephanie Barron, she is now a private eye...a gun for hire...just waiting for a distinguished gentleman, with a certain swagger and in need of a wife, to walk into her dingy fourth floor office. Actually, she is still Jane Austen, but I garner by the series of Barron written books she plays a role similar to that of Angela Lansbury in the senior citizen inspired television classic, 'Murder, She Wrote.'
Published in 2002, Barron confesses in the Editor's Foreword that in the spring of 1995, due to extensive restoration, in what used to be used as coal cellar of a home of an old Baltimore family, several boxes were found containing entire manuscripts believed to have been written by Jane Austen. I know, I know, it really is a corny concept but Barron writes it all with a competent skill that Austen herself may have approved the usage of her person as a crime sleuth. That is if Barron didn't put her in such compromising positions (compromising for a lady of Austen's class and stature, not compromising as the term is understood by today's standards).
'Jane and the Unpleasantness at Scargrave Manor' begins with Miss Austen attending the country manor homecoming of her dear friend, Isobel Payne, Countess of Scargrave who is newly married and only recently returned from an extended honeymoon on the continent. I'm sure Barron wrote about how the two met, but for the life of me I can't remember reading it. Nevertheless, Austen is very good friends with the newly appointed Countess who is five years Austen's junior - Austen at the time of the story was 27.
Everything is all peaches and cream when the Count/Groom is found struck with a mysterious illness during the ball to only die later that evening. Could it be murder? When Austen's dear friend is accused of the deed, Jane, being inquisitive gentle mind that her readers have always imagined her to be, springs into action to prove that the accused parties in this terrible matter are indeed innocent. Once again, it sounds very hokey but believe me, it comes off better in written form.
"Discover the truth, my dear Jane," she pressed me,
her brown eyes dry and her carriage unbent, as she prepared to be shut up in her rooms. "It is beyond my power to do so. As God is my witness, I am innocent of my husband's death. Sir William is unmoved and the townsfolk easily led; but your penetration, your understanding, must be my only hope. Do not fail me, Jane!" (page 157)
We were ushered to a snug parlour, where a bright fire cast its glow on several easy chairs; and Mr. Cranley's card had barely been delivered, then Mr. Hezehiah Mayhew appeared to place himself at our service. He was a portly gentleman of some seventy years, quite stooped, with a shining pate that had long since lost its hair, and two bushy white eyebrows that attempted to supply the difference. (page 247)
I thought the second paragraph almost comes across as a Charles Dickens imitation.
'Scargrave Manor' was a better book than what I was expecting - you know that there is a variety of quality of all things put out under the auspices of Jane Austen. Seriously, this book could have easily taken me into another dimension where Austen wears high-heeled boots and cracks a mean whip for all I knew about it. Thankfully, Barron stayed fairly true to Austen's writing style, even at some points sampling the gothic style that sometimes Jane herself liked to play with. Further, she gave editor footnotes which expanded various elements of the story so that readers were clued into the traditions and pop culture references of British life amongst a certain social set during the early nineteenth century.
Overall, I would recommend 'Jane and the Unpleasantness at Scargrave Manor' for any fan of Jane Austen or even any fan of mysteries. Barron did a fine job of writing a Regency Period who done it that even without all of the Austen trappings would have worked well. She throws in enough red herrings that made it, for me at least, guessable until the end as to who murdered the Count and why. There are eight books in the series thus far and I would gladly read more of them.
Westerfield © 2009


Comments: 19
I enjoyed this review much more than I've ever enjoyed anything Ms. Austen wrote. Could you do a Complete Works review?
I've seen an awful lot/a lot of awful Austen-flavoured books recently, so you explained that phenomenon for me, Lisa -- thank you!
I'm with Kris for not reading any of her stuff, though.
It sounds like Ms. Barron has some talent. On the surface imitating style seems like cheating, but in reality, I think it would be difficult to pull off something authentic. I think I'm tired and none of this is making sense. G'night.
Great review!
Thank you for posting to this group whose only purpose is to thank you for posting to this group.
Instead of wine, which I’m not overly fond of, I would always drink margaritas for book clubs because it always gives whatever you read a certain zing.
John, considering she gets more famous with each passing century I imagine makes her male contemporaries turn over in their stone cold graves. Unfortunately, she never really had an agent of anyone looking out for her interests because she died still being concerned about money.
Dannielle, I think a lot of it has to do with your enjoyment of history. I am a sucker for books and movies that are written deal with certain time periods, the Regency Period being one of them.
John, didn’t V.C. Andrews at least write, ‘Flowers in the Attic’ one of my all time favorites? I was distressed to learn years later that maybe all of the inbred sequels to that book were written by ghostwriters.
Mary, it was a good relaxing read.
Dorinie, I believe I bought this one at my local Barnes and Noble where they had a buy two get the third one free offer.
Kimberly, please do because as I mentioned above, there is a lot of *&^% that is written under the guise of Austen and her characters. Barron did make the effort to make the writing believable and the mystery something people won’t figure out until the end.
Marilee, it makes perfect sense. I do admire writers that can pull it off. I feel I can write in the style for the length of a short story but would find a novel taxing. I also liked how she shared different elements of obvious research she had done. It clued the reader into the historic aspects of the story better.
Kerry, it was a pleasure. I do like your group.
Dame Ruth, it is always a pleasure to serve both you and the tenants of your wonderful group.
This sounds like a charming (if deadly) read. Not sure what the real Jane would think of murder mysteries, but if anyone could solve a crime, it would be one of her characters.