John McCain is surely the dullest candidate for president we've had in years and all signs point to his defeat come November.
Barack Obama appears to be a shoo-in and it's all over but the voting.
I say - not so fast.
There's no question that Obama has positioned himself as the second coming of John F. Kennedy, especially with this trip overseas where he's being adored, namely in Europe, just as he's adored here in the USA. In fact, all the trappings are there for a repeat performance. He's doing the JFK rag.
But wait a minute. With all that going for JFK - the multitudes swooning for him -- well, after the votes were counted, JFK won by the slimmest margin within the 20th century. True, he outnumbered Richard Nixon in the Electoral College 303 to 219, but, when the POPULAR vote was tallied, Nixon and JFK were in a virtual dead-heat. JFK won by a nose.
I'm old enough to remember this, but in fact-checking it for my novel of JFK and the 1960s (THE DAYS OF THE BITTER END) I was astonished all over again to find that, in the end, JFK was ahead of Nixon, nationally, by no more than 100,000 votes - and there is still talk that even that number was achieved through some hanky panky. (To put it another way, JFK beat Nixon by two tenths of one percent, 49.7 to 49.5.)
This is starting to sound like Obama versus McCain; on the one hand the charismatic candidate, Obama, and then, well, then there's McCain who falls asleep at his own speeches. Even Republicans find him generic or less. (Republican Light.) There have been no head-to-head debates between these two, as of yet, but they still keep going at each other and certainly Obama always gets the better result.
So did JFK, or so it seemed. Those Kennedy-Nixon debates were televised and it's part of our heritage to remember that Nixon came across as bumbling, gloomy and sweaty, while JFK was viewed as articulate, cool and princely. Yet, and yet, people who listened to the same debates on RADIO picked Nixon as the winner. (At worst, a draw.)
Still, observers (such as myself, a huge fan of Kennedy's) were sure that JFK would win this thing in a walk.
[Caution: If you think I've come here to bash Nixon, wrong. He had admirable qualities aplenty, as when he helped save Israel in 1973.)
JFK had everything going for him. Nixon? Practically nothing. (When viewed as a popularity contest.)
Nixon had Pat, a wonderful first-lady (in waiting) in her own right - but she was no Jackie. Another plus for JFK; a minus for Nixon.
JFK was handsome. Nixon was not. The Kennedys, all of them, were photogenic and fun.
Nixon was not fun!
JFK's speeches (like Obama's today) thrilled the people. Nixon did not thrill!
JFK gave us hope and promise. Nixon (or so it seemed) only gave us politics.
JFK offered us new frontiers. Nixon offered nothing except more of the same (or so it seemed).
JFK was youthful. Nixon was old (or so it seemed).
JFK galvanized the youth of the America. Nixon's appeal was strictly middle-brow (or so it seemed).
JFK charmed America's intellectuals as he charmed everyone else. Nixon charmed nobody (or so it seemed) and was thought to be un-read.
What a shock, then, to find that when Huntley and Brinkley and Walter Cronkite kept posting the results, Behold --
JFK, who had so electrified the nation, and the world, was barely making it, and Nixon, who put us to sleep, was gaining!
Nixon had just as many Americans in his pocket as JFK.
We were astonished to learn that all this time there was "another America" that had chosen this moment to speak up.
McCain? Obama?
Sound familiar?
About the author:
The Bathsheba Deadline: An Original Novel Jack Engelhard's latest novel, THE BATHSHEBA DEADLINE, now in paperback, places journalism at the center of our war on terror and has been cited by best-selling author Robert Spencer ("The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam") as "a rousing thriller about clashing civilizations" and by Letha Hadady as "a towering literary achievement." Engelhard wrote the international bestselling novel INDECENT PROPOSAL that was translated into more than 22 languages and turned into a Paramount motion picture starring Robert Redford and Demi Moore.


Comments: 12
This essay exposes perfectly how a general media consensus can cloak the thinking, choices, and actions of a large number of Americans, a number obviously as large as that which is uncloaked.
Being a GW Bush supporter, I'm still wondering where those people are heard who supported GW Bush into his terms of office. My husband and I have often commented that these types of people are most often doers and workers, laborers like him. Their satisfaction gained in physical accomplishments seems to release the need to expound through the media. When they do want to expound, their disdain of the obvious slanting of media focus might divert them from attempts (which would fail anyway) to be heard through that venue.
Yes, if they did attempt to be heard, we know what would happen to those voices. The mute button would be ablaze. The broadcast button iced. You dramatized this phenomenon clearly in your novel, THE BATHSHEBA DEADLINE.
I'm glad that you brought up your novel DAYS OF THE BITTER END; I had placed it on my wish only hours prior to noticing this article.
I've read (and reviewed) your Kindle novel, THE GIRLS OF CINCINNATI. Since I'm addicted to reading on my KINDLE device I'm wondering if DAYS will be published there any time soon?
If not, I'll buy it in trade paperback.
Having read all your novels now except DAYS, DEADLY DECEPTION, and THE HORSEMEN, I'm again craving the unique presence of your writing style within a novel format. This is not to say that your composition in op-eds is any less sophisticated, sought after, or satisfying.
As you know, you're a born writer, and the spirit in that capacity always carries a voice which develops a homing beacon for its readers.
For me, the cohesive form of a story told within a novel has something which cannot be duplicated in any other medium.
Yet, I love movies also, and wonder why film seems able to achieve its highest artistic effects when it is NOT attempting to translate a novel. I'm hoping that one day your novel INDECENT PROPOSAL will be redone in a movie which does capture its thematic content, style, and essence. That story deserves that, as do all your books.
Sorry for the length of this reply and its sidetracks!
A Gather article by Ian Thorpe repeats an impression of Obama as a humorless man, in a humorless party. This has been my take on his whole campaign. Being from the UK, Ian and his countrymen are a little bit spoiled, his country has at least half a dozen political parties to the left of the Democratic party, and some of them absolutely know how to take a joke, and tell a joke.
(I think they're trying to set us up with "there will be too many voters for the computers to handle, Don.)
We have a wonderful Secretary of State whom really loves fair elections.
Of course she is a Democrat.
So that I may understand you...
You want to KILL me because you disagree with me? And, you people wonder why we call you fascists and nazis? Jeezus.
But if you are going to send kryptonite, you may want it to be of the red variety. Kisses.
Since Clark Kent here is a pseudonym, in a sense possibly a humorous (surely not deadly serious?) play on TV characters... maybe the gift of Kryptonite could be taken in the same slightly playing-off light?
The point, as I read it from Dan, was not a desire to KILL you (the real YOU, the actual human being behind the Clark Kent ploy), but rather, possibly, a desire to "bleach out" the verbal thrashing against those whom the hidden human behind the hidden identity of Superman is working to discount...?
Regarding what the Liberal Media may not have brought out as sleazy slander against McCain, or any other political figure (Right or Left), possibly even a Liberal-leaned media will only go so far in slinging slime, possibly hoping to remain at least slightly removed from earning a tabloid identity. All (of us) humans, of various colors, creeds, pseudo I. D.'s and political affiliations have stomach linings to live with, LOL.
Warning: The above was an attempt at humor... which may fail.
Add to that an increasing polarization between "red and blue" states and, I agree, I think it will be a squeeker.
Hope FloriDUH has got that chad problem resolved.