My expectations for this movie were high, thus I was both satisfied and disappointed. The movie is over two hours but feels longer. If one factors in the commercials and previews then the movie last about six hours. While it is intellectually stimulating, if you are expecting a lot of action from a storyline devoted to the genesis of the CIA, you will be disappointed. If I haven’t made it perfectly clear yet, ‘Shepherd’ has the pace of Vermont molasses in January flowing up hill.
One of the problems with the film is that it switches from 1961, Bay of Pigs era, back to how Edward Wilson (Matt Damon) started his career with the agency. The time periods are labeled, but due to a real lack of identifiable changes in clothing and hairstyles of men of a certain SES (social economic status) often it is still difficult to tell. Damon has such a baby face that although he does a credible job playing Wilson as an older man burdened with his choice of career, I still wanted to laugh when thinking of him as a man with a grown son.
The best part of the movie is when it introduces Wilson as just another Harvard student performing in drag (Hasty Pudding Award anyone?) who is tapped for the legendary Skull and Bones organization (both George Bush Jr. and Sr. plus John Kerry were members during their Harvard tenures). The movie points out that most of the men are protestant (with a few Catholics thrown in for variety). May I also add the obvious. all the members were male, white, of upper-middle class to upper-upper class. Skull and Bones is not the campus organization that sought to change the status quo but maintained it – often at a very high price. From an initiation that includes nude male mud wrestling while older members spray the participants with urine to a ritual where each novice snuggles nude (again) in a coffin and confesses his most intimate secret, the audience clues in that there is just something off with this exclusive group. The story progresses from there examining the reasons Wilson joined the CIA to the personal sacrifices he makes in order perform his job.
The movie is brilliantly acted. Angelina Jolie transformed herself into a sorority girl who is forward (back in the day some would call her fast) who then mirrors the life of her husband except she at no time feels she is working for a higher cause. Damon, despite before mentioned baby face, emotes the dull bureaucratic ennui that men like Wilson grew into with slightly stooped shoulders and haircuts that were always just so. The supporting cast was fantastic too. Particularly Michael Gambon (the most recent Professor Dumbledorf from the Harry Potter franchise) who plays a British agent who’s sexuality becomes an issue. Robert De Niro casts himself (he is the director) as a general who is slowly being amputated away due to a blood condition. William Hurt plays Wilson’s boss who may or may not be selling government secrets.
The role of Wilson’s son, both older and younger versions, seem miscast. Austin Williams plays Edward Wilson Jr. and gives the audience a real Damien vibe. In fact I even looked up his profile on www.imdb.com to make sure he didn’t play the son of the devil in the last Damien outing. I misconstrued his anxious peeing on Santa to possession – me bad. Eddie Redmayne plays the older Wilson Jr. who is entangled with some spy business and a woman. The spy stuff I bought, the woman thing…I don’t think so. I have no problems with gay actors playing straight or visa versa, but my suspension of disbelief will only go so far. BTW, I really have no evidence about Redmayne’s sexuality one way or another, except to note I think I have more testosterone cursing through my veins and I am fairly girly girlish.
As noted earlier, the film works on an intellectual level. We see how one university with one clique is able to infiltrate the highest levels of government on the premise that it is their birth right. There is also an underpinning that during WWII the US was finally able to take the big dog world mantel from the British who were tired from fighting two major wars in as many generations. There is also the rise of the cold war and the division of the world as communist or capitalist. Although, as one character notes before throwing himself out of a window, the Soviet threat to the capitalist west is overblown – all smoke and mirrors.
With all of that said; I must admit that I did not fully understand if Wilson was supposed to be a good spy or brilliant bureaucrat. I wager De Niro would answer both. I found myself underwhelmed with Wilson’s office (aren’t spies supposed to have a little better digs?) and did not quite understand why a particular Soviet agent found Wilson intriguing, especially considering that Wilson is always reporting to someone higher then himself thus giving the audience the feeling that he has never experienced life as his own man.
Because of the movie’s flaws and length, I would recommend seeing this film on DVD. If you have little interest in the development of what we know as the CIA, I don’t this movie will entertain you at all. If you do have even a slight interest, this movie may inspire you to do some research.


Comments: 20
Devil Woman, thank you. I was excited about this movie too. I saw 'The Holiday' the night before I saw 'Shepherd' and I thought it was a fun movie although it is predictable and very, very light. At least it delivered. I saw 'Shepherd' with two other people and one was getting all adult ADHD on me. During some of the scenes, I admit that I started to try and entertain others by doing dancing jazz fingers. It made the film less dreary at least for me.
:-D
Devil Woman, I think Angelina's performance was one of the best things in this movie. I actually believed that she was a sorority girl on the make and then when she was yelling at Matt for stuff I really felt her becoming a shrew. To be honest, I was surprised by her range. I can believe her as Laura Croft, but they aged her in this film and she looked...okay she still looked great but she did seem older. I never saw 'Girl Interrupted' because I knew that movie would make me nervous. I was a social worker and worked in a rehab so I saw plenty women who were out of it and/or manipulative so I avoided the movie. Someday I will catch it on cable.
Dannielle, try it sometime. My little party was the annoying group who were laughing during semi-serious scenes. Especially the part about the son and the French woman - yeah right.
We watch most of our movies on DVD -- I think only the Lord of the Rings movies were deemed worthy of theatre prices. We'll either see "Good Shepherd" on DVD or not at all. If we do watch it, I'll let you know!
Merry Christmas to everyone.
Devil Woman, I promise next time I see 'Girl Interrupted' I'll get a cold Corona and settle in to watch it.
Joe, it is interesting. I don't think it is a waste of money. I would see it with someone though and see and early showing so you can discuss afterwards. It is a story worth the telling and does bring up some interesting points.
Dannielle, MERRY CHRISTMAS TO YOU TOO!!! I don't watch many films on DVD, only when I am at someone's house. It is usually the theater with friends or cable at home.
You are so going to dispise me...I didn't like the 'Lord of the Rings'. I knew it was techically good film making and Viggo Mortesen (last name spelling ?) is certified catnip, but I wanted to toss the Hobbits into Hobbit hell - or whatever they called that one place with the fire eye. I saw all three and I did think they got progressively better, but * sigh *. I hope you still will read my reviews, but I felt I had to be honest otherwise you might miss out on flicks you should see in the theater just because I panned them.
Dolphi, thanks. It is certainly not a movie with any religious meaning, except of course, for the cult like ickiness of the 'Skull and Bones' club. It is worth looking into if you see it on TV. Once again the story is worth telling.
Merry Christmas to you and everyone!
Alex, I am a fan of Angelina. I think she is a fantastic actress, although I could not say the same thing about Marilyn Monroe. That is interesting your son would say that. I think more people will look upon her as a great actress once she does start to age.
Let me get this straight, are you blaming me for people skipping this film? I think the thing about writing movie reviews as an amateur is pondering if the price of admission was worth it. It used to be movies were cheap entertainment, the activity of choice for those on economic driven dates or just wanting to casually hang out. Now it is a bit of an investment - granted, not huge but enough that most do not want to spend two hours and fifteen dollars (if you include drink and popcorn) watching something you do not enjoy. I know you commented on the other review I just wrote and so are aware that I have access to a theater that serves tasty beverages to those of us over 21. As far as mindset before watching a film, nothing gets me more steamed then being forced to endure an endless loop of commercials after buying a ticket. I do not even watch commercials at home, which I suppose is why many ad agencies target movie theaters, but it makes me feel less as a valued customer. Maybe an apple martini is what I needed to think 'Shepherd' was a grander piece then I did.
I was aware of the Skull and Bones organization. I knew both Bush and Kerry were members, plus many more. It is an interesting tie in to the top levels of government. Something about nude male mud wrestling and important governmental posts just shouldn't mix, but then again I went to state schools.