My initial response upon completing this novel was a sense of relief. Having devoted several years to the storyline, like many others I found myself sighing as I closed the cover and sat back to absorb what I had read.
I concluded after a couple hours that this book is no longer for children, as the series originally started out, though the writing itself has not progressed into a maturity adult readers would find satisfying. Most kids under the age of fourteen seem to have a hard time digesting the storyline after the third book, and unless they read with their parents or supplimented information from the films, the story stops there for them and feels impossible to comprehend. Take into account that the films leave an extraordinary amount of information to the imagination, winking only occasionally to readers with a subtle flare here or there.
The level of violence began to increase after the return of Lord Voldemort at the end of book four, each subsequent book bringing more violence, murder, hardship and torment. Yes, violence and murder are everywhere around us, children must learn to deal with the hardship of losing a loved one, as Harry himself did in book five, Order of the Phoenix, but how many of the children who read these books can fully relate to the idea of a beloved parental figure dying beside them in battle? A concept that feels wholly unrelatable to many of the books young readers, Harry's anger and bitterness explode into a new sense of maturity that will carry Harry through the rest of the series.
By the time book seven hit the shelves, Harry had said goodbye to a number of friends and family members: including his beloved parents, Cedric Diggory, Sirius Black, and then to further complicate matters, Harry's mentor and master, Albus Dumbledore. Book seven begins in an estranged sense of confusion and bewilderment about where to go next, what will become of Harry, and what matters of importance his deceased mentor left unspoken before his untimely death. Already he has lost so much, but then immediately the book slices away the first bit of comfort allowed to Harry, his beloved Owl, Hedwig. This death seems to cut away the last bit of youth from Harry, but it is only the first of many to follow. Shortly after Hedwig's murder in flight to the Burrow, MadEye Moody, who inspired Harry early on to pursue a career as an Auror, was struck down by death eaters. At the same time, George Weasley loses an ear, Harry gets a tooth knocked out and nearly loses his longtime friend Hagrid. The blood and angst in this scene is enough to put anyone on the edge of their seat, now imagine if that person is a child. Following after that are a countless number of violent deaths, some vague characters barely exposed, others well-loved and loyal friends that laid their life down on the line for Harry time and again.
Setting aside the notion of violence and the seemingly inappropriate content for children, we look at the non-target audience, which has grown in volumes since the series first exploded onto the market back in 1997. Much of this population consists of adults, many with a fantasy sweet-tooth, even more with children of their own (who couldn't wait to find out what happened to Harry after book one, and probably at times seemed more excited than their own children....) Rowling's ability to create believable adult characters and relationships has been questioned from the beginning, though there are several adult role models who do the job rather nicely. Professor McGonagall for instance, Molly and Arthur Weasley, eventually Professor Remus Lupin (who turns out to be a werewolf, despite how much the children love and adore him...) As the stories progressed, however, the lack of believability when it came to many of the adult relationships and characters seemed forced. The only adult relationships of importance in the series are again, Molly and Arthur Weasley, and Vernon and Petunia Dursley. The two extremes presented here seem to allow no middle ground, and once again the adult population begins to feel sorely misrepresented in the story. Many readers expected that these relationships would develop as the series did, and with the inkling of romance between Remus Lupin and metamorphmagus Nymphadora Tonks sparked in the fifth book, looked forward to the development with high hopes.
However, as the relationship progressed, it fell flat on its face as Remus Lupin's character fell into question when he left a pregnant Tonks to go on adventure with Harry and the Trio. It seemed almost as uncharacteristic an act as him showing up after (listening to reason and finally going home to his wife and unborn child) his son is born to fight in battle, followed quickly by his wife only to have both of them die without description or reason. Two of the most skilled wizards (Remus being a former DADA professor and Tonks an auror for pity's sake!!!) and just like that they're dead. To add insult to injury, as Harry uses the Death Stone to bring back his loved ones to comfort him before his own death, we find Lily and James Potter, Sirius Black and Remus Lupin. There is no Tonks, and Remus appears perfectly happy without her there. What is that, if not a complete and total lack of development? And further more, what kind of example does that entire scenario present to the readers?
As I realize this is a story about Harry, and not all the characters can have their moment in the spotlight, it seemed an insult to the characters above mentioned to even have that brief mention of marriage and family, if she was only going to gloss briefly over their heroic deaths.
I did find that the redemption of longtime Arch-nemesis, Severus Snape, rather exciting. Many a reader, including myself, had long ago concluded an obvious connection between Lily Evans and Severus Snape, though how close that connection was, no one could tell. There were many things about Snape's death, however, that bothered me immensley. Snape was an extremely powerful wizard with incredible knowledge of the Dark Arts, and he dies before Voldemort and Nagini like a muggle.
Having spent the last four years an avid reader of quite a bit of fanfiction, there were so many scenes that might as well have been written by some of the more talented fanfiction writers out there. The 'wrapped in a bow' ending seemed to climb straight out of fanfiction hell, as Harry and Ginny put their eleventeen kids named James, Lily, Albus and I've forgotten the others for the moment, on the train to HOgwarts. There is hardly mention of Teddy Lupin, Harry's own Godson, who would have seemed the more logical choice to close the circular story with than little Albus Severus Potter.
There is much more that happens in this story that I have glossed over in the same manner Rowling seemed to have glossed over the important bits in her own story because all in all the story itself was not that bad. There was action, adventure, and challenge as we have seen in the series all along, but overall I am at a loss as to who this story should be geared toward. It is certainly no longer a children's story, and while I hate the idea of censorship, I certainly don't think my own twelve year old would be able to read and actually comprehend this story. The torture and violence that appear from the very first chapter onward are simply too much for the age level Scholastic Books has marketed these books to. In theory, many of the original readers will have grown with the series, but the fact that coloring books, sticker books, toys and so on come out with each of these books suggests that these books are geared toward children, but the cold, hard facts are that they are no longer appropriate for the age group they're geared toward.
I could go on forever, but I won't. I was happy to see Ron and Hermione finally have their day, and it was great to see Severus Snape redeemed. I was glad Harry didn't really have to die, and that Voldemort got his in the end. It was nice to see Dumbledore had flaws, because no one expected it, but overall, I am glad the series has come to an end because I fear further stories in the series would lack any sense of quality whatsoever.
This review is an opinion, and I do not expect everyone to agree with me. I would love to hear your feelings and opinions, and will respect any and all differences, but please only reply if you have constructive things to say. Flames will not be tolerated.


Comments: 16
Some of my opinions/comments:
As the book focuses on the lives of our three heros it does sadly leave me wishing more could have been written about the "B" Team of Ginny, Neville, and Luna. My guess is that the publishers and maybe even the movie studio didn't want another volume the size of Order of the Phoneix or longer. I was also saddened that the story rather ubruptly ended with Riddle's death. I would have thought we might learn a little bit more of the rebuilding of Hogwarts and wizarding society in Britain.
I was glad that JKR did include an epilogue 19 years in the future. It does allow her the option to actually fill in some of the blanks if she choses. I wonder if she realized that Albus Severus Potter's initials ASP form the name of a snake and so he might rightly wind up in Slytherin.
I was happy that Ron married Hermione. Who would have thought that after their rocky start all those years ago. I was also happy that Harry came to his senses and married Ginny. My guess is that Neville is the herbology professor. But what ever happened to Luna? I imagined her marrying Neville, but no she's not mentioned in the epilogue.
I guess the 19 years in the future disappointed me because as you pointed out we hear a brief bit about Neville being the Herbology professor, but as you mentioned what about Luna? What about George? How is he fairing without his twin? Is WWW still open, or did he close down because he couldn't do it without him? There was too much vaguely implied, but not hashed out at all because she was focused so much on Al's worries about being in Slytherin and all the other torments his older brother had teased him with. I felt it was a bit flat and again, lacking.
What a great reply! Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me, Tony! :)
I also do recall (although it may be a false memory) hearing a long time ago that Rowling intended her series to "grow with" her readers. So while the first book is intended for children (age 11) the final book is intended for teenagers (age 17). The target reader is supposed to be the same age as Harry, for any given book. If, instead of comparing the harry potter books to each other, you compare book 7 to other books targeted at teenagers (For example: Eragon, written for teenagers by a teenager), it doesn't seem so lacking.
And as I pointed out on another review - I, among others, have decided to refuse the epilogue. The story is much better without it.
I think I understand what you mean. I believe JKR was faced with a pretty sticky situation in that her fan base goes from preteens to people at least my age and maybe older. So to what level of maturity does she write? Also, since the book is about Harry she's really focusing on him and viewing life through his eyes. Unfortunately we only get to know the others when Harry gets to know them.
As to your point about Lupin, I can see why Remus might have left Tonks & Teddy to fight Voldemort. It's my opinion that Tonks asked Lupin to marry her. And while he loves her, he's not ready for any real responsiblity. His comment about "my kind aren't supposed to have kids" really says alot. He sees himself not only as an outcast from society, not even his in-laws are happy to have him the family, but as a failure and needed a way to prove himself. Running off to fight a war is a rather male thing to do. Leave the family at home and go off to glory fighting the enemy.
Although JKR said she wouldn't write another Harry Potter book, she left herself room to write about others in the future if she desires. I am also a David Eddings fan and it took him 12 books to really complete the story he started with Pawn of Prophecy. He wrote an entire book Belgarath the Socerer to fully develop a character similar in purpose to Dumbledore. Then he wrote Polgara the Soceress the fully develop a character who might have been like Molly if Harry had grown up with the Weasleys.
Laura, I do believe and agree with you 100 % that her intent was for the series to grow with Harry, but Scholastic Books, her US publisher, does not gear the books toward the appropriate aged children. The merchandise and marketing is still geared toward 4th grade students, and many of them get into it in fourth grade, devour the series before they hit fifth grade, and find themselves a bit lost by the time they reach book five. I agree with you about adults more easily relating to the situation of a friend dying beside them in battle, and that is one of the points at which I started to feel the stories were taking a more adult turn. It really began with Harry carrying Cedric Diggory's body back from the graveyard in Little Hangleton, carrying a fallen soldier back from an unexpected battle. . . a very adult situation indeed. Thanks again for all the input. It is nice to have open-minded people to discuss this with.
Firstly, you say that these books are no longer children's tales as they were originally intended. But, certainly, they are. As with any book, the life experiences of the reader will affect the response that he or she is able to elicit from the text. Thus, a younger reader may not necessarily comprehend all of the subtle details and messages that Rowling includes in Deathly Hallows. However, the underlying themes of the story are still those which have pervaded works of children's literature throughout time -- the supremacy of good over evil, the value of friendship, and the power of love, trust, and honesty. Sure, death is an element of the story, but it does not detract from the wholly basic, chimerical, and traditional nature of the plot. As I glance over at my bookshelf right now I see several of my favorite children's books, most of which also deal with the issues that are introduced in Hallows. The works of Tolkien, Lewis, and L'Engle are timeless classics that are deemed so in part because they dare to explore the dark elements of their plots and challenge the growing maturity of their readers. Rowling also does this, writing a story that children can grow into, and not one that conforms to a sophomoric mold designed for grammar school use.
As for the notion that "the writing itself has not progressed into a maturity adult readers would find satisfying," I both agree and disagree. Yes, the writing has not matured, although I do find it satisfying. But, nonetheless, the writing simply never needed to mature, because the book is still a children's fantasy book. Unlike some of my other favorite authors, like Kingsolver and Irving, Rowling never need to rely on poetic prose to carry symbolism and meaning to the reader. It is instead the magical plots that carry the same equally compelling messages to the reader.
Regarding the development of adult characters, I feel that in order for these characters to work, they needed to be, well, a bit childlike in nature. After all, they are all wizards and witches. As I sais before, I do feel as though this is still a children's book and by displaying the slightly youthful tendancies of some of the adult characters, Rowling correctly shows children that everyone of every age still has flaws and makes mistakes, and that adults can learn from kids just as kids can learn from adults.
Also, as far as Lupin's decision to run away from Tonks, this decision is not uncharacteristic at all. Lupin has always been wary of allowing his "condition" to affect his friends, just as he was concerned about the dangers that the monthly trips to the Shrieking Shack posed to his Hogwarts friends James, Sirius, and Peter.
All in all, I feel that these books are appropriately targeted to the age group of children, even if they cannot grasp all of the plot elements. The most important themes in Deathly Hallows are certainly not out of reach of most children, and the argument that the book's value is weakened because children cannot relate to some of the ideas is simply not true. While I myself have never experienced carefree life on the French Riviera, I do not dismiss the works of Fitzgerald and Hemingway. Although I cannot claim to have been driven to suicidal thoughts due to an impossible love, Shakespeare does not elude me. And, as I am not a woman, the many feminist tales of the Victorian era and the present-day do not directly relate themselves to my life. Nonetheless, I can quite clearly understand the meanings of the books because there are parts of the stories to which I do relate .
Thanks again for a great review. I agree with the other points I did not discuss -- I loved the description of Dumbledore's flaws, and, of course, the redemption of Snape. They were wonderful additions to an excellent story.
I felt there were long sections of people describing action, news, feelings - as if there were no other way of getting the point across than a monologue.
I am glad it is over - loved the hype and all, but I DO have other books to read.
Didn't like killing off both Remus and Tonks, either, although some people have suggested that it's bringing the godfather/son thing full circle - Harry had a godfather who couldn't be there for him, but he will get to be there for Teddy. Eh.
As for Tonks not showing up when Harry used the stone - he wasn't close to Tonks, although he did like her. The people who showed up were people that he truly loved, the most important people in his life. Although that makes you wonder why Dumbledore didn't show up at that moment.....
Maturity level of the books - yep, agree totally. This is where PARENTS have to step in and take responsibility for their children's reading materials. My children are almost-12 and almost-9. We are very conservative in our beliefs. My oldest has been allowed to read the first 5 books, the youngest, the first 3 books. I'll let the youngest read #4 sometime soon. I felt that there was too much bad language, drinking, and the overall ickiness of #6 precluded either of them reading that one for quite a while, and the same thing for #7 now. However, I have read them ALOUD to both of them (well, we just started #7 last night...) with appropriate verbal editing going on while I read. Parents must step up and not give in to just any ol' thing with the excuse of, well, they've already read all the others... Doesn't matter what the previous books were like, if something isn't appropriate for your child, it's not appropriate, and that's that. But it's your decision, not someone else's - and every family's decision is going to be different.
For my own part, I feel that so many of the inherent lessons of the series were worth having my child exposed to in this fashion. Death is not an end, but a new beginning; violence and selfishness lead to the downfall of their practioners; empty are the victories of those who desire nothing more than success; people are rarely as flawless, nor as flawed, as we may perceive them to be; our ability to love one another and work together toward a noble end truly is the greatest strength of our species. No, I am glad that my daughter has devoted as much of her attention to these books as she has. From the outset, they sparked her imagination--she never dreamed that such worlds of imagination could lie on the pages between a book's covers until Harry Potter. Her vocabulary has grown far beyond that of any of her classmates. The corresponding development of the sophistication of her ideas and her ability to express them both precisely and concisely are life skills which will serve her well in the years ahead, regardless of the future path her life may take. If, with the full benefit of hindsight, I were given the chance to make the parental choice again, I would gladly make the same decision.
As for your assertions regarding the relative sophistication, or lack thereof, of Rowling's writing: all I can say is that I look forward to reading your own contributions to the world of fiction. I wonder, will you be able to live up to your own standards of excellence? I sincerely hope so. Yours will be tomes truly worth treasuring!
I think that Rowling has had an incredible amount of well-deserved success, and she is a fantastic Young Adult writer, but I do feel that that maturity level does not meet many adult expectations. Is a matter of her lacking excellence, absolutely not, but a matter of expectation on the part of the adults who read and expected more.
As for your hopes for my own future as a writer, I am sure I will have flaws of my own that readers pick to bits, especially if I inspire as many writerly readers as JK Rowling has done. One can only hope to scale the same heights of her monumental achievement.
Cheers.
I think if children grew with the story, they will understand the loss presented in the books, But younger audiences may not. My Children Love the movies, but can't get through the books. But they are 10 & 13. Perhaps If I let them read one book a year, they could relate. They just missed the whole "growing up" thing.