DO THEY SEEK TO DISCREDIT THE MAN WHO ADVOCATES THE TRUTH, OR DISCREDIT THE TRUTH SO THAT NO MAN CAN ADVOCATE IT?

  Segment 1:

After every thing the issue remains. America is spending over $3 billion a year on Israel and Egypt and Americans are dying in thousands because of that support.

After some soul searching, I that the current conflict I find myself involved in was partly my fault. Therefore, I will retract and apologize for any remarks that may sound anti-Semitic. I have published three articles in anger, and for that, I sincerely apologize.

Every conflict has two sides and any decision made without considering both sides is manifestly unjust. The following was written to those who supported my views, and those who have yet to decide. It is not for those who played Judge, Jury and Executioner for convincing them would be an exercise in futility.   

Allegations:

•1)      Plagiarism: wikipedia.org defines Plagiarism as the practice of claiming or implying original authorship of material, which one has not actually created oneself, such as when a person incorporates material from someone else's work into his own work without attributing it.

In one of the articles I published, I stated that the big corporations control a certain percentage of the media and the Jews control most of what remained. A demand for documented proof was made. This demand was repeated in every article I wrote until I consented to furnish the proof demanded. I supplied the proof that enumerated the media companies owned, controlled and/or affiliated to Jewish people.

The proof was not in any article I published; it was part of my reply. Fact is public information; therefore, incorporating facts in a reply does not qualify as plagiarism. However, that would not stop certain people from claiming plagiarism as a defense for facts that they could not refute.

•2)      Anti-Semitic: wikipedia.org defines Antisemitism (alternatively spelled anti-semitism or anti-Semitism) as hostility toward or prejudice against Jews as a religious, racial, or ethnic group, which can range in expression from individual hatred to institutionalized, violent persecution.

Nothing in my articles could be remotely associated to hatred much less institutionalized, violent persecution of the Jews. However, that did not stop them from branding me as anti-Semitic. Most Jews use this word carefully because the misuse of this word would pervert its true meaning. The people who claim to be against anti-Semitism are promoting this sentiment by unjustly accusing people of anti-Semitism.

•3)      My detractors tried and convicted me of creating identities. The evidence to justify this consists of grammatical errors and the lack of profiles.

These people are well aware that profiles can be made members can choose not to share their information. Yet they ignored that because it would not validate their evidence.

I email my articles including my comments to those who support my views. Of course, it would not be possible to cut and paste those comments that they agree with, to append theirs.  Either these people ignored that, or they are unaware that the technology exists.

If your inherent fairness compelled you to reserve judgment on this matter, I would like to present the opposing ideals free of bias (if that is possible) on the next segment of this series