Obama hasn't won, yet.
If he wins the Democrats' Leadership, that's when he'll become a target.
Why?
Because he's AGAINST the war.
He's therefore a threat to the hegemony of the US military-industrial MAFIA — and the same thing that happened to the Kennedys might happen to him... basically for the same reason and probably at the hand of the same CIA agents (read: traitors).
I don't agree with everything Obama says BUT his anti-war position is just plain common-sense... and that's exactly why he's in danger.
And it's a shame it has come this sorry state of affairs.
Just so he can upset the US WAR MAFIA, may Obama win the Democratic Leadership
recommend this
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 31
If Obama loses, he might catch a cold and die.
Either way he might die - and the odds are pretty good that some day he will, in fact, die. . .
That's a dilemma - any way out?
-Mark
His stance against the war is what's could hurt him because that's why previous Presidents -and- presidential candidates have been "removed".
JFK would surely like to expand on the danger of taking position against the war but very sadly, he paid with his life for it... and died at the hands of corrupt CIA agents.
This is all speculation but hey, maybe we're also on to something — who knows?
you wrote:
it's highly unlikely that the fact that he's (half) black will ever be a "problem".
I'm confused - which half of him is black?
=Mark
"Obama is called an African–American. However, Obama is half-white. His father, who was black, abandoned him and his mother when he was about two years old. He lived with his white mother and white grandparents."
Click here for the source!
You can find this information all over the internet, though.
Is that a racist or a sexist comment? Or a bit of both?
There's only one race on this planet - the human race and O'bama fits in to this category just fine.
i do not know who you are or were you live or the way you think; sometimes people think way to much and burn there brain some ; what they need to do is give it a rest. i for one feel that people talk way to much and say not one thing. or they say the same thing over and over and realy dont mean what they say.
the Presidential race it is who can get something bad on the other. i am suprise that they have not said how long it took one or the other one to stop wetting the bed.
the thing they say about the great and wonderful thing they will do they never come.
now i vote i feel all should vote ; just dont vote for someone that other people say are great and wonderful.
get in there and fine out for yourself.
the p
i am with you { what the world needs now is all come together as one }}}}
{ what the world needs now is one way of thinking; which is {{{ LOVE AND KINDNESS TO OTHER AND PEACE FOR ALL }}}}}
Whatever happens, Obama would make for a more interesting Presidential candidate than Clinton who would just perpetuate the "Clinton / Bush" hegemony in the White House.
Again, the color of his skin changes nothing to the fact he'd be a target by those who profit from the war.
I appreciate a heads up, but, if it's just speculation, which is to say opinionated spin on casual observations, you are trading in the putative danger to Mr. Obama's life without providing meaningful substantiation, sources, resources or recourse for those who might care about him. You write a paragraph in about ten minutes, which burns hot and fast, gets lots of hits from people wishing to comment, while Mr. Obama's life is further endangered from spreading the idea of assassination, and the rest of us, we who are paying attention, aren't even sure you had any unique information or special insight that would help anyone stop the event you are prophesying. Simply put, you are using the threat to Obama's life as coin to attract comments, without providing any redeeming value to your readers.
If you care enough, the responsible article would demonstrate that you have done research, that there are actual threats, and report those actual threats. To casually accuse any group of people based on their reputation is simply to feed the hate mongering which is so problematic to the great number of us who support Barrack Obama. If this threat is real, we need to know about it. If it is not real, your article helps to make it real. You can help by doing real reporting.
Allow me to address Stephen Alrich M.'s comment about the foundation of the theory I expose.
First, I'm not withholding more information than what's shared in my original post. I'm just very aware that the military industrial complex eats away over 50% of the American budget, year after year, namely to enrich incestuous companies like Halliburton.
Now, if Obama is serious on "having doubts about the US war agenda", he's therefore a direct threat to the very hegemony of the military industrial complex -so- he's bound to become a target for these people, the same way JFK became a target when he got tired of the "made in the USA" war mongering.
If I come across more information, I'll gladly share it but unfortunately, I have nothing more. Perhaps you can check out the search engines for more sources, perhaps articles like this one.
Let's hope for everyone to live a long, happy life... even when they oppose the "war agenda", set by greedy industrialists, in the US and abroad, who show little to no regards for human lives other than their own.
Someone forgot his Muslem stepfather? How convenient.
Because of his anti war stance? What anti war stance? He has voted for ever appropiation to continue the unconstitutional agression in Iraq and Afghanistan and has promised Israel support in a war with Iran.
His anti war stance is only retoric to play to those of us who oppose the "war" and gain votes, nothing more. Actions speak a lot louder than his words.
JMO but I think he is is much greater danger from the Red-necks in our society.
they'll riot and loot over anything."
Now there's a good, healthy, racially bigoted comment, from a good, healthy.......
Lights in this world threaten their profits.
And that's the bottom line.
Secondly I think this kind of suggestion should not even be blogged...it is not appropriate to discuss serious issues like this concerning someone's life.
It is neither prudent nor helpful.
Imagine yourself in his position, would you want anyone to talk about it?
I find it highly irresponsible.
The web is also a place where nuts abound.
If soldiers are in arms way of course you support them, unlike McCain who sent them there and then refuse to give them supplies including vest to protect them.
His step father had little influence on him in religion as his mother they were both non religious persons....like atheist.
I was born catholic and been through all the rituals yet have not been to church in 30 years.
As I see it you rants are illegitimate both in content and substance....more like gossip.