November 05, 2007 10:33 AM EST
(Updated: November 06, 2007 02:02 PM EST)
With healthcare being such a hot button issue right now, Michael Moore could not have better timing!
SiCKO discusses, explores and analyzes our current healthcare system in the United States and compares our healthcare system to that of other countries (such as France, Cuba and Canada.)
So sound off with your own views of the man, the movie or the issues. Did you see it? Do you want to? What do you think? Gather has come across 5 copies of the DVD and would like YOU to review it for us! Whether you love it or hate it, we want to hear why!
For those who are not familiar with the movie, click here to view the trailer.
So here is your chance to let the world know what you think. Comment below and tell us why YOU would like to review this controversial movie. Instead of listening to the headlines we would rather listen to you!

Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the
Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
Comments: 47
good medical care is something everyone should recieve not just the elite among us.
I talked to one person who just went on and on about how horrible it was but then admited he hadnt even seen it he was just going off what he "heard".
I havent seen it.
Sicko is the most humane, the least pedantic of all of his films. Just as Holly and Kay say above, it's a movie about people. I loved it.
If you get a chance, check out Garen Daly's article on SiCKO.
The info is in your inbox, and Thanks again!!!!
I ma glad that my sweetie, Donna F., is being sent a copy; that means I'll get to view it (and review it) too. I can't wait!!!
10
I agree with Lisa G's answer, the man definatley needs some serious help getting his facts straight. And I'd appreciate it if Gather would move the ad for this video off of my "my gather" page I'm sick of looking at him.
Of course, he's very far to the left. So far that he even turns off some Democrats but to me he has exposed the truth in every film endeavor he's ever taken.
This time he's taken on the health care industry. If this film is like his last films he will get much of his information correct but I'm afraid he will get many things wrong as has come out over the last year of so about his past films.
If he's a documentary filmmaker it's one thing. If he's turned into a propagandist then I worry if I will bother to watch another of his films after this one.
I really liked what he had to say in films such as Fahrenheit 9/11 when it first came out and I still enjoy Bowling for Columbine but my opinion of him is changing. My final decision will come after I watch SiCKO.
Even though our current plan is horrible, it's better than going without coverage. Since we have a 2 year old son, that's just not an option.
I'm not sure that I think the government should pay for our health insurance in its entirety, but I do think that something needs to change soon in our health care system. Too many people are going without the medical care they need because they simply can't afford it. Too many employers are no longer offering health care benefits to employees because of the high costs.
I would love to see and review this film. I think that this will be a very eye-opening and interesting film.
I met him once ... and I have seen his films ... he is a pathetic man. I would not waste my time seeing his new one. He is simply using the crisis in America to make himself rich. Shame on him.
Besides the point, this "Documentary" is terribly one sided, and doesn't tell about the American health care system, only points out its weaknesses. The porpoise of a documentary is to educate, not spread propaganda. How ever well executed this film is. It is total crap. The only one good doc Michel Moore has cranked out is Bowling For Columbine.
As for the part in the film where Michael Moore interviews a Canadian and they tell him there is no wait for a particular surgery, I find that interesting. We actually admit patients to our facility from Canada, willing to pay cash because they can't afford to wait the time required for their particular surgery.
And the scene where After hearing that detainees in Guantanamo have access to free health care, Moore assembles a group of World Trade Center rescue workers to travel to Cuba in order to get the medical help they need for ailments they incurred in 2001. He just marches these people in, no VISA, just here, I'm making a film, wink, wink, can you help us? Where were all of the Cuban patients needing help? Did we just step on in? Healthcare doesn't just pay for itself no matter how you slice it. We could offer a different level of healthcare, one that is universal, but who decides when grandma is too old for heart surgery? Have you any idea how many $$ are spent attempting to save people physicians wouldn't give a 10% chance of living to. Do you want the government to decide if we save premature infants? Especially when this infant is yours? Be careful when you put the government in charge, you may lose more than you gain. Michael Moore brought to light some great things to discuss, but he never presented any solutions!!!
I won't be watching this one.
For those who argue that universal health care is not the solution, walk a mile in my shoes.
Rich Canadians also go to India to get surgery for 1/3 the price of the US, and statistically better outcomes, as well as a 5 star vacation. The point is that not everyone can afford it.
Michael Moore's solution is single-payer not-for-profit health care. The bill is before the house, it is HR 676 and if you want to do something useful, sign the petition to pass it here
Christine ... the story you tell I have a lot of sympathy for. I left a job at one point, and got COBRA. I thought it was a lot, $361/month. It lasted for 18 months and then poof, it was gone.
Then, instead of transferring me over in the same account, I was out of the former employers "group". First they said they would have to charge me triple, then they said they could not sell my insurance at all. I am a bit heavy, and I mean a bit, and my blood pressure is a bit high, but I run 4 miles almost every day. I am healthy as a horse and luckily did not have any medical problem during this time.
What I went through was bad enough. What you went through is the worst thing that can happen, and there is no reason you should have had to go without insurance or medical care or go bankrupt. and the thing is no one really understands these rules, I sure didn't.
When it hit me I emailed and called all my representatives who sent me back form letters. The President, the Government as well. This has got me totally steamed, this is not way to run a country. Michael Moore got this movie exactly right .. what kind of people have we turned into?
> The porpoise of a documentary is to educate, not spread propaganda.
Well Andrew, let me suggest you go avail yourself of an education ... maybe flipper will teach you a thing or two.
Then when COBRA ran out, as a regular person, I could not just switch my coverage to me ... I had to re-apply. I am healthy man, a bit overweight, and marginal high-blood pressure. I cannot buy insurance. I had to spend hours filling out forms and sending checks in to these companies only to be told that they will not insure me. I run about 4 miles a day ... 3-6 times a week. So ... tell me that is fair. Tell me that makes some kind of sense.
What about people who are insured and the insurance decides not to pay their claim? What about the people such as k anne above you have bills that insurance will not pay totally more than an average worker makes in their lives?
I'd like to know what Michael Moore said that you think is a significant lie, or tell me what points he makes in this movie that you think are wrong?
Mr. Moore wants to convince people on the wonders of socialized medicine of other countries, yet he fails to mention how many people die waiting for an MRI, CAT scan and a hospital bed to become available for an emergency surgical procedure. Our culture is such that it expects and demands instant gratification, would not tolerate a system, which expects you to wait for even the simplest services or procedures, let alone a doctor's appointment. This of course would probably allow another Michael Moore the opportunity to trash the US for having a lousy government sponsored and administered health system. If Mr. Moore feels so strongly on the blessings of Canada's health care system, maybe he should consider moving his residence permanently to Canada. Would you trust any government to run and oversee your health insurance? "Remember FEMA."
Of course this is my opinion BEFORE watching the movie, maybe after watch it I may change my mind, so can I please have a free one?
You have a point about FEMA ... but remember that was Bush, another Republican, and the Free-Market crowd that wants anything government to fail so they can rush in with private industry and save it - for profit.
You can see many parts of this movie free if you go to Youtube if you really are so cheap you will not rent it. Having your eyes opened can be priceless.
I may be too cheap to rent a useless, one-sided, pessimistic, get rich quick scheme like the video, but at least I have good medical insurance and you won't find me waiting around for the government to give me a handout.
You are right I did focus on your one aspect of your argument
trying to making the point that if you were not aware of this
aspect to health care, how and when it was created in its
present form you might want to be a bit more open minded.
I do not think socialized medicine is a cure all, but it will
start to be a treat all. The government is not bad at all
the things it does, and it is not only government that is
bad at some things and makes mistakes. Look at our
car makers. That issue is too complex to just say all
government is bad and leave it at that.
For 90% of illnesses and problems that would get most
of the people in the country whole and moving I think
the government could do that. Canada has an
interesting situation now. For people who have
enough money they can take trips to India to get
expert surgery for 1/3 to 1/2 the price. I think something
like this would be acceptable, and then perhaps
private insurers would still have a job, and could
stay in business by providing real value, with some
baseline competition, ie. the government.
The rest of your post is merely name calling and
trying to trash Moore's documetary so I will ignore
it.