The Counterfeit Victim: Provincial Hick Abuses Language and Truth

A recent article by a provincial hick claimed that the author had been "stalked" because articles were posted with the same tags that he favors.

That the articles included numerous tags, and were posted to a dozen political groups, was not mentioned.  This is not the only relevant fact that the under-educated "sage"fusses about and stamps his feet.

The whining author made other ridiculous assertions. He claimed that he was "accused" because an article that was published with tags that he favors denounced the unreason around an issue (the Obama birth certificate) about which he had not published. 

The hilarious articles about the President's birth certificate and the Supreme Court  were, in fact,  published by other members of the Protect Our Delusions Support Group that has formed around the whining author.   The authors were likely to see any article with these tags.

The blogger of rightwing nonsense cribbed from talk radio believes that he is part of a persecuted minority.

(Sample comment from the Right Wingnut: " We need to let everyone know who these people are so we can be on alert.")

The author's vague paranoia and weird ideas of grandeur have an even longer history.  He once expressed surprise that one of his anti-Obama rants (without a single fact or reference point) was "found" by other people on Gather.

Can anyone of normal intelligence be so clueless?

Does he not realize that tags are INTENDED to direct Gather traffic?

Is this not another example of the whiner's pathological obsession to control how ideas are discussed?

For those Gather members who are curious about the disputed tag, it  resembles "The Charmin Report".  The thoughtless political diatribe (sample: "The far left just see America as just another country. They see nothing special in our nation.") has much in common with the esteemed American paper product:  they are useful for the same purpose.

The insecure blogger of modest talent approves all comments to his articles, and has been a swift remover of anything that challenges his fragile ego and even more fragile "arguments".

He is dishonest when he says that he has removed only the comments that were offensive or "hateful", as has been demonstrated in other articles.

 Rightwing Scribbler Sees "Hatred" in Every Challenge

 When another member of the Protect Our Delusions Support Group complained about a Gather member who had left comments, the provincial hick removed all the comments of that Gather Member.

Quoted from a comment by the Hick: "Well Charles from now on I will delete of (sic) Bob C.'s comments. Even the ones on this thread now have vanished."

Only after the "removed" comments were published for others to see and evaluate, and after the whiner's refusal to accept any challenge was noted by many others, did the whiner begin to allow even the slightest critical tone to appear.

The title of the linked article above is still accurate, I believe.

The easily-wounded blogger, painfully reminded that he is not in the "mainstream" of contemporary American life any longer, believes that those who note his unsupported arguments, illogical opinions, and inability to debate must "hate" him.

Nothing is further from the truth.  I love to laugh along at the "Charmin Report", and I thoroughly enjoy the fussing and the hand-wringing of the boondock pundit who is always a victim of others.

There is no "hatred" involved at all.

It is a joy, and a moral duty, to expose the hypocrisies and untruths of those who refuse to allow dissenting comments.