As we observe Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the debate over the display of the Confederate flag on public grounds has resurfaced (“Biden wants Confederate flag off grounds”). Senators Joe Biden (D-DE) and Christopher Dodd (D-CT), two potential Democratic nominees for President, spoke out today against the continued display of the flag of the Confederate States of America in front of the South Carolina Statehouse while speaking at an NAACP rally in Columbia. Many see the flag as a symbol of a proud Southern heritage, while others see it as representative of racism, rebellion, and slavery. As in many Southern states, African ancestry is the most the most common background of those living in South Carolina today.
What do you think the Confederate flag represents in American society today? Should its display be permitted on public grounds? Is this a freedom of expression issue, and if so, where should the line be drawn between freedom of expression and hurtful reminders of the past? If you live in the South, how do you think your views differ from those in the North and the West?


Comments: 46
It is time to realize that the same misplaced mindset that gave rise to the Civil War also contributes to the anachronistic pandering to its symbols. Do you want to get in a time machine and go back to live in those days of mortality, starvation, hatred, and utter ignorance? No? Are you happy being a citizen of the USA? Then Shut Up and haul down the damn flag.
In the preceding rant I failed to mention the courage and determination and sacrifice of the CSA's soldiers. Granted, they gave the last full measure of devotion. But courage and sacrifice in a misguided struggle are at best a mixed blessing and at worst .... Robert E. Lee is regarded as a demigod in some circles for keeping the South alive as long as he did. I say: if he had been less competent, fewer widows would have died looking at the back of a mule. His efforts at reconciliation and his service as president of Washington and Lee University were helpful, but his lack of political understanding that the War was unwinnable was a flaw.
A few years ago here in Chesterfield County Virginia, the Board of Supervisors declared a Confederate History Month. Not Civil War history month, mind you. When the protests on both sides started up we became a laughingstock. Before it was over we had visits from David Duke and the Worldwide Church of the Creator, and it was not fun. Please, let's let this die. It has gone on too long.
Chris, I lived in Midlothian at the time you describe and I was proud of the County Commissioners for declaring Confederate History Month. It was, as I know you recall, in direct counterpoint to black history month which was crammed down our throats every January. I was disappointed when they buckled under and was not at all embarrassed by the ensuing kafuffle.
If you think the Confederate Flag is such a good thing, stop waving the stars and stripes. You can't have it both ways.
A little American history might help understand what the war was about or is that taught any more?
Read the tenth amendment and then read the history of why that particular amendment was inserted.
It is sad that during my lifetime the Confederate flag has become such a magnet to the politically correct thought police.
It was once a widely respected emblem and represented not so much the pride in military feats during the War Between the States, but in the determination and efforts exerted while surviving the indignities imposed during the occupation and political persecution of the Reconstruction.
The flag is now such a rallying point for thought police it is rarely displayed as it once was.
I can remember the Ole Miss band had a flag big enough to cover the entire band. They would march out of the end zone unfurling the flag as they went and the crowds loved it.
The Walters and Chris' of the new order have no idea of what they speak... How sad.
Bill, God bless you and keep you. Here is the definition of the civil war, as it is in history books, not as you might like to glorify it:
The traditional definition of a Civil War is a war in which two governments fight for control over the same state. The Government of Abraham Lincoln viewed the conflict as a Civil War, with both sides fighting to govern the South. The other side, the Government of Jefferson Davis, viewed it as a war in which one sovereign nation (the United States) invaded another (the Confederate States).
Until we are able to ACCEPT history for what it was and not as we would like to rewrite and remember it, we'll just have to agree to disagree, but the flag will eventually come down or Federal aid dollars of all kinds should be withheld.
It's a just a matter of principle.
Oh yes, the "occupation and political persecturion of reconstruction". It was mean of those federal troops to try to shut down the lynch mobs and KKK when they burned barns and terrorized the recently freed blacks when they attempted to vote. It's a shame I am so ignorant of the real story of the south, as presented in "Gone with the Wind" and D.W. Griffith's "Birth of a Nation".
I happen to believe that the Civil Rights Era was a pretty good thing and that we are all better off for it. Either slavery was good, or "all men are created equal". In my view it is inconsistent to reject slavery while feeling nostalgia for the culture that accepted it.
Read your history, not somebody's take on it.
Also, I thought I did answer your original question about the Nazi flag. The Nazi flag is a symbol of death and genocide. Hitler and the Nazi party killed many Jews, gypsies, and others. Because of that, the Nazi flag has become symbolic of death. Like I stated earlier the Confederate flag does not symbolize death. We, in the South, did not kill millions of anybody. No, I do not think the Nazi flag would be appropriate. Again, it's like comparing apples to oranges. You can't say oranges are anything like apples. They are two different things. So are the Confederate flag and the Nazi flag.
the Confederate flag.
I've siad enough. I am sure there are people out there who want to shoot me right now for my stand.
is perfectly fine with perhaps a couple of exceptions.... First being state rights. If we use todays current events to determine to what degree states rights are influenced by Federal Guidlines and FEDERAL LAWS, we can look no further than to the current example of voter initiatives that would allow the legalized use of medicinal marijuana in Oregon, Vermont, Arizona and several other states. The fact remains that these states are not allowed under FEDERAL LAW to permit or make legal this practice, and currently none are doing so for fear of losing FEDERAL FINANCIAL AID which is contributed to and created by the tax dollars of all AMERICANS.
My point being this, if your state or any other state wishes to continue to fly the confederate flag or include its image on any flag, or embellish it onto any state government owned property, including parks, court houses, etc, I think it only fair and fitting that those states, choosing continued defiance in the matter, should have all FEDERAL FINANCIAL AID revoked until such a time that the FEDERAL LAWS are complied with, including these states' "symbolic surrender". This means no aid to schools, highways, infrastructure intiatives, etc.
Tell your elected officials and voters to put their money where their mouths are and I'm sure they won't be whistlin' dixie when it's all said and done.
George Wallace began flying the Confederate battle flag over the Alabama state house in 1963 to protest Attorney General Robert Kennedy's audacity to visit the state following widespread police action to harrass and harm civil rights activists.
In Mississippi, Confederate flag-waving crowds of students attempted to prevent James Meredith from enrolling at "ole Miss, and the public comments of the time leave no question about the meaning of the Confederate banner.
Ditto all the other bastions of the "old south". Look it up - when did the south suddenly "rediscover" the virtues of their beloved symbol of treason.
The pernicious canard that the Civil War was not about slavery is one of the soothing fictions of the modern small government movement. Read what Jefferson Davis wrote about giving his life so that africans could not rise above the level to which God had ordained them.
Yes, there were competing ideas in the north and south about taxation and trade -which is inevitable in a mercantile and an agricultural based economic system, but to deny that slavery was not a cause of the war is ludicrous.
For 40 years, the South held both expanded homesteading and the admission of new states hostage to the need to protect a Senate majority that favored the "peculiar institution".
And, if there were a few slaves still living in the northern states, as one commenter noted, northern states had abolished slavery by the time the South seceded.
There would be some merit to re-claiming a beloved symbol of of heritage if this symbol was not linked continuously to opposition to Civil Rights.
Every one has a right to whatever idiotic symbols they treasure, but the fictions around these symbols and the anger they arouse should also rightly be heard.
If you want to make it ugly, then it is. Other than that, what other flags or symbols should we ban?