I am no fan of Obama and even though some card carrying jerk, you know who you are, accused me of wanting to see an assassination, which is ridiculous, so ridiculous in fact, that it begs the question, "Why was a person allowed to carry an assault rifle to hear the president speak?"
Now, I would imagine a water gun shouldn't be allowed. How is this possible?
As to the jerk referenced above it was in regards to my article on the Obama poster criminal who was captured. If you need to know who it was follow your nose, he stinks.
Let it be known: I'm against gun control, but this is ridiculous. The man was outside were Obama was speaking, but that's so wrong.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/17/obama.protest.rifle/index.html


Comments: 32
You took his comment out of context and furthermore you know you did.
WWJD
If he was trying to further the "right to bear arms" cause my guess is he did more harm than good.
I suspect you're right.
I just had to copy and paste that it sounded so good AC.
Carrying the gun in a highly charged political situation showed poor judgement on his part in a number of different ways and had the potential to be dangerous not only for himself, but for innocent by standers as well.
The same idiots were at Petersburg and Appomattox. You know, if they crowd gets real "Glen Becked" and some ballon pops bullets could fly and I would not bet on the survival rate of the gun totin and God fearin. Talk about a gun control legislation aftermath. This is the end result of politics by lies and fearmongering.
This guy was African-American. I'm sure he'd appreciate the fact that you're associating him with Confederates.