Almost everyone but the most diehard McCain supporters agreethat he ran a lousy campaign, and one major reason for it is that he usedtraditional right wing tactics at a time that their intellectual bankruptcy hasbeen totally unmasked. In thisgolden age of political satire, these positions have been unmercifully parodiedon the Internet, The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, Saturday Night Live,Real Time with Bill Maher and other outlets that have increasingly becomethe primary sources of political information for millions of Americans, and notonly the young as is widely believed. Here are some of the reasons the McCainmessage failed.
1. Obamais the most liberal member of the US Senate. McCain continued the timeworn tactic of using the word“liberal” as an expletive, but it didn’t take a brain scientist to figure outthat the past eight years of conservative domination (six of them in whichconservatives controlled both houses and the presidency) have gotten us intothe mess we are in. Many voterstoday identify themselves as liberal and the right is not only attacking Obamawhen it uses this term, it is attacking a huge number of American voters.
2. Whenthe word “liberal” doesn’t work, drag out “socialism.” This bizarre desperation tactic,hammered at during the last weeks of the campaign revealed itself for what itwas—a desperation tactic. Americans saw the hypocrisy of calling Obama a socialist when thecongress just completed the “socialist” takeover of our financial system. And Obama’s quiet, humorous response tothe charge—“the next thing you know they’ll be calling me a communist because Ishared my toys as a kid” was devastatingly effective.
3. NegativeAds are the way to go. Neverhas a campaign been so unrelentingly negative as the McCain campaign, and neverhas negativity turned off so many voters. People wanted to hear McCain’s views on the economy and what they gotwas day after day attacks on Obama. To be sure, Obama ran some negative ads as well, but there’s no questionthat the tenor of his campaign was civility as opposed to the downrighthostility expressed by McCain and especially Palin.
4. Guiltby Association. Day afterday we heard about Obama’s association with “terrorists.” He “pals around with them,” as SarahPalin so tirelessly (and shamelessly) insisted. This was perhaps the dumbest charge of the campaign andpeople know that the individuals Obama really “pals around with” are some ofthe most intelligent individuals in the country. Americans didn’t care if he sat on a board with anindividual who was an ex-Weatherman when he (Obama) was eight years old, andthey don’t feel he should be held accountable for things that his formerpreacher believes. The apogee ofthis guilt by association approach occurred on Hardball when Minnesota Republican congresswoman Michele Bachmann said shewas "very concerned" that Obama "may have anti-Americanviews" and that the news media should investigate the views of members ofCongress. Americans have beenthrough one McCarthy era and unequivocally rejected another.
5. Taxand Spend Democrats: This isan extension of number one above, but it has an extraordinarily hollow ringwhen Democrats were the last party to balance the budget and when the Bushadministration has spent us into deficits so large the National Debt clock hadto be expanded because it ran out of digits to record the figure once itreached ten trillion dollars. Bush has spent us into a hole in everyyear of his disastrous presidency and McCain offered no real solution to thatproblem.
6. Republicansare the party of ordinary Americans, or “the Joe the Plumber” motif.This too seemed a last minute grasping at straws. Joe the Plumber is set up as an example of the sort of“Everyman” Republican economic policies are supposed to help. That Joe was not what he initiallyseemed is emblematic of the whole McCain campaign. Almost everything McCain said was 180 degrees away fromthings as they actually are. Theleading example of that is that a vote for the Republican standard bearer, whowas endorsed by both Bush and Cheney (even though McCain wisely didn’t make toomuch of this) would be a vote for change. How dumb does the McCain campaign think that Americans are? A vote forObama was clearly the vote for change, and a vote for the Republican candidatewas a vote to keep things as they are.
7. Divideand conquer. Americans of all stripes are sick and tired of hearingthat some of us are “real” and others of us are not. That some of us are true patriots, and others of us, eventhough we say we love our country, actually hate it. That we can’t disagree without demonizing one another. So Sarah Palin pulled out herlipsticked pit bull persona and told us that small town values are the realAmerican values, and God-fearing, churchgoing people who support wars and don’tprotest anything their government does are the true Americans. Obama’s truly reaching out to Americansof all stripes was easily more appealing than this callow and opportunisticdivisiveness.
8. Sharingthe wealth is un-American. The progressive income tax, a part ofAmerican tax policy for over a century, is based on the concept that thosefortunate enough to earn and amass a great deal of wealth should pay a higherpercentage of their income to help level the playing field for who have notbeen so fortunate. Sharing thewealth is as American as hamburgers and a malt, and those who can afford FiletMignon and vintage Rothchild Bordeaux know it. That’s why Warren Buffet says he should pay more taxes andwhy people like Bill Gates and Ted Turner start foundations to give away theirmoney where it’s needed.
9. Fearand Terrorism. Republicanscan protect the country from terrorists better than Democrats can. Sure they can; that’s why the worstterrorist attack in American History occurred on their watch. McCain seizedBiden’s gaffe about Obama being “tested” in the early days of his presidencyand turned it into a major campaign issue. But in 2008 Americans are more fearful of losing their lifesavings and not being able to pay their medical bills than they are of beingkilled by a terrorist. Finally,when you pit fear against hope, you pit humanity’s great weakness against itsgreatest strength. The audacity ofObama’s hope gleefully triumphed over those fanning the flames of dread anddisaster.
10. SarahPalin, Sarah Palin, Sarah Palin. While Sarah Palin is certainly not a traditional GOP tactic, there islittle doubt that McCain chose her to solidify support with the Evangelical right. But Palin alienated a lot more votersthan she seduced. The interviewwith Kathy Couric alone was such an embarrassment that it made McCain’sjudgment highly questionable. And the Tina Fey impersonations were sodevastating because she hardly had to change any of Palin’s words to dothem. If this woman is the futureof the Republican party, they are looking at a long, dry spell out of office.
In sum, the 2008 election will go down as aturning point in America—a time when reality caught up with the destructivepolitical tactics that have turned Americans into enemies with one another.Obama offered us a way out of that miserable state of affairs, reminding us, asLincoln did a century and a half ago, that a house divided against itselfcannot stand.
FredMoramarco is Professor Emeritus of English at San Diego State University andthe Artistic Director of Laterthanever Productions.


Comments: 36
Basically, I said that the campaign made rash decisions based on the importance of distancing McCain from Bush and that the Palin choice was one of those. He was so outspent by Obama, that I think he gave up as soon as he realized that Palin was a liability.
Obama's 6% win is not a landslide. Frederico history is a great teacher,I remember the last time the liberals were celebrating the death of the republican party,1976,Carter the liberal was elected a new dawn a new day for America change was coming. Fast forward 1980, a man named Ronald Reagan stepped from the republican party as a conservative and beat Jimmy the liberal in what was a "Real-Landslide" 48-State's.
Frederico,enjoy your victory,keep trash talking-2012 is soon to come and the conservative party will be Obama's foe.Obama is just another liberal sitting duck ready to spread the money around,it has never worked and it will fail again,CARTER!!!!
Forty Eight//Forty Nine,state routs,Fredirico.History!
You know as well as I do that McCain switched his opinion on numerous topics to gain the GOP nomination. I had admired McCain prior to that.
I am a registered Conservative not a republican.This is still a center right nation,just look at all the gay marraige laws that were voted down even in liberal hollywood.
Micky,
You wish this was a center/right country. It is not. It is more moderate than you think it is.
If Republicans don't clean up their act quickly, and distance themselves from their radical fringe, and the fear and smear tactics, they will become a thing of the past.
I am a Republican who is embarrased by the actions of my party this past election!
I voted for Obama/Biden, and am seriously considering switching parties permanently.
Mostly the voters for McCain can be speculated to be the voters who saw through the Obama BS campaign tactics and actually read the issues, and were smart enough to realize that Obama would drive this country into the ground.
You should note that while this campaign was an electoral landslide, it was a lot closer in the popular vote (within 8 percent).
Hey Nick, I'm not uneducated, I don't drink Kool Aid and I'm not a young voter. Neither are Susan Eisenhower, Colin Powell, Chris Buckley and many many others. Picking Sarah Palin for his running mate was not putting "country first" and I think that had a lot to do with wiy most of us voted for Obama.
For what it is worth, here is my opinion on this. This election was not one of ideology. We've been through enough swing right/swing left politics; just look what it got us this past decade. This was an election about change. But not a change from the far right ideology to a far left ideology. Keep in mind that nearly half the country still voted for an old white guy with no consistent message and an embarrassingly uninformed vice-presidential choice. The vast majority of Democrats are also not far left. And Independents like myself certainly didn't vote for Obama so he and Congress could ram an extreme liberal agenda down our throats like the Republicans rammed a far right agenda.
No, the American people want, and deserve, a government that remembers that their role is to deal with the big issues that affect us all. We don't want them playing the wedge issues to garner votes from pockets of people who in the name of some trivial issue don't mind seeing our country sold piecemeal to China. We want them dealing with energy in a rational, informed, and sustainable way. We want them dealing with health care in a rational, informed, and sustainable way. We want them dealing with two wars and others pending in a rational, informed and sustainable way.
In short, we want them to think.
If they think...if they think longer term than their next reelection (which has already started for the House members)...if they think for the betterment of the country for all Americans, not just the half or so that voted for them, and not just for the living but also for our children and our children's children...if they do that, then they will be reelected in a landslide. If they pursue partisan agendas to the detriment of our future, the wave that swept the Democrats into power in 2006 and 2008 will start sweeping them out of power in 2010.
It is up to us to become informed about real issues, and press our representatives to deal with them honestly and openly for the collective benefit of all Americans. This is up to us.
Most of us voted for Obama because he is an intelligent, thinking, listening kind of guy. If he is smart, and he certainly is, than he will govern for all of us, not simply the far left because the Congress is led by Democrats. Clinton made this mistake in 1992, and in 1994 the Gingrich revolution swept Congress. Obama will be cognizant of those mistakes, as will Congress. If they are not, then the Republicans will gain back seats in 2010.
Yelling "socialist" and "friend of really old terrorists" for six weeks is not going to convince a nation in crisis?
Who could have predicted that?
One of these days I'll get around to posting some of the political "wisdom" of the right-wing blowhards on Gather.
And I completely agree with David K above.
I am not looking forward to Obama pushing
an extreme left wing agenda - No! No way!
I am only looking for Obama to undo all of
the crap that the idiot GWB installed during
his presidency, that is all.
And I do believe if we can just restore things
to where they were before GWB took office
in 2000, our country will turn around.
And by the way, Micky D, I would not speak
too highly of your idiol Ronald Reagan.
Yes, a lot of us were fooled into thinking
he was a great President, like me, for
instance, but our fond memories of him
have faded, and we can now see how
distructive his policies really were.
If Ronald Reagan were to run against
Obama RIGHT NOW, I would bet that
he would lose.
While I voted for him twice, I truly
regret that, and I would never, ever,
vote for him again.
2000 we had war declared upon america-2008 the people who did it have been beaten.so far-no attack on our soil in 8 yrs. Thanks to our great military and the courage of W. to not quit and surrender to our mortal enemy-Jihadist.
Reagan was not perfect,no person is but, Reagan is gone now and thanks to him some other things are not around anymore.
Soviet Union
Berlin wall,millions freed in eastern europe
A decimated military that Carter left
Hostages held by our enemies
And we had the greatest economic boom this country ever had.
LBJ+CARTER+CLINTON,BILL AND HILL. Combined fail to compare to Reagan,check the latest presidential ratings put out by historians mostly all democrats. Ronald Reagan ranks #-5, Clinton ranks #21-tied with Jimmy Carter. But Clinton came in first in lying and cheating and taking illegal campaign money from the chinese communist,Charlie Tree,Johnny Chong,Bill Ayers types they also hate America.
Hey Nick, No, it was one reason and a very good reason too.
How is it a die hard liberal, such as you claim you were, became a die hard conservative?
According to your penultimate posting, the main reason for your voting Obama was Palin. This really is not a very good reason.
these headlines, which makes many of us feel good to be an American again:
http://obama2008.s3.amazonaws.com/headlines.html
Do you seriously mean to sit there and tell my that we don't belong in Afghanistan? For such an expert perhaps you could hop the next flight over and go find Bin Ladin for us. Trust me when I say that the biggest surge comprehensible would not find Bin Laden. Adding in NATO, we are fairly saturated in Afghanistan. You have to understand that the country is the size of CA and only 2% of it is traffickable. The rest is pure mountains. Good luck finding someone in that crag. Besides, Bin Ladin is in Waziristan. The reason we are there now is the same reason we are in Iraq. We are trying to establish a government that can defend itself against radical coups, or at least one that stands a chance to.
Don't get me started on why we are at war in Iraq. I am a firm believer that we were right in going in and right to stay until the job has finished. Of course the liberal hindsight lens is crystal clear and applying judgements ex-post-facto is SOP on the left.
As far as the let the rich get richer policies, if that is what you choose to call it, fine! I choose to call it "capitalism", or "free market economy". I'm tired of you liberals always trying to give handouts. Haven't you ever heard of the old proverb about teaching a man to fish? I came from nothing and am preparing to enter law school after earning four degrees. I never took any handouts from anyone. I believe that if you are too lazy to control your own path, you deserve to be where you are. No one owes you anything. Stable government, infrastructure, defense, and a stable legal system. That is pretty much it. Government has no constitutional right to rob Peter to pay Paul.
PS, it wasn't W that got us into this mess. It was Carter who started the idea that everyone should own a home, regardless of financial stability and credit back in the 70's, proponed by Clinton in the 90's, and supercharged by senate housing committee (led by dummocrats) and Fannie/freddie (Also led by dummocrats appointed by Clinton) in 2005 that pressured private lenders into making bad paper.
The thing about this whole Obama hype is that you people are just so spiteful and hungary for change that you are blindly putting your faith into something that seems like the most different. You have no foresight into what that change may be, or what the repercussions will be. Now the million dollar question of the day. . . . Is it POSSIBLE (maybe hypothetically) for an agent of change to make things worse than they are, or is anyone touting change GARAUNTEED to make this nation better? Obama supporters just don't seem to want to be bothered with analysis of policy.
PPS - I also find it humerous that Obama has created his own executive office (office of the president elect). Complete with his seal and nifty website, which by the way has taken down the agenda they offerred (hmmm . . . . ).