This is normally considered a major no-no.
Guns at Obama events
About a dozen people carrying guns, including one with a military-style rifle, milled among protesters outside the convention center where President Barack Obama was giving a speech Monday - the latest incident in which protesters have openly displayed firearms near the president.


Comments: 10
-Thomas Jefferson
Americans are just sending a message to their government. The President and all other elected official need to be reminded that they serve the people.
"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?"
-Thomas Jefferson
The trouble is, as I have stated many times before in these discussions, we are still socially and governmentally operating in our baboon mentality with sophisticated chest beating, banana awarding male and female dominant hyarchy paradigm (any partisan political system). Most important, however, is the fact that we cannot grow up out of such a primitive paradigm of governance through political rhetoric, which is the heart of the problem in the first place. Only religion has the power to sway large numbers of people to a new paradigm. And present day "religions" (i.e. antiquated systems designed by God for more primitive societies thousands of years ago such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) cannot "cut it." As a result, most people in the developed countries have no real idea or appreciation for the value of religion or even as to its efficacy. They invariably equate religion with those antiquated hold overs from eons ago and don't even know what those were, only the distorted versions held by their present day adherents, who have their own fiduciary axes to grind. So instead of looking for the religious paradigm from God given for our times, they hold onto their own distorted versions from the past never meant for today. In effect, they have thrown out the baby with the bath water.
Just how would an armed citizenry benefit us in the context of your first paragraph? Whom would the citizens fire upon?
"Who would the citizens fire upon?" They would revolt against injustice in the system if it came to that. Their view is that (not mine necessarily) if they are not armed and do not demonstrate that they know how to use the arms, the government will take advantage of them and remove their inalienable rights. I know this probably sounds unconscienable to you but that is "my America". Not everybody has to agree with you, which is one of the things that makes our country what it is.