by Martin Van Creveld http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig5/crevald1.html )
"If we have not enjoyed fighting the 20% of the Iraqi population that is Sunni, how much pleasure will we find in fighting the 60% that is Shiite? Of course, an American attack on Iran will only intensify our war with Iraq's Shiites.
So no, we are not winning in Iraq. The only meaningful definition of "winning" is seeing the re-emergence of a real Iraqi state, and by that standard we are no closer to victory than we ever were. Nor can I see anything on the horizon that could move us closer to such a victory, other than a complete American withdrawal, which begins to look as unlikely under Hillary as under George. All we see on the horizon of Anbar province, sadly, is another mirage."
http://www.d-n-i.net/lind/lind_archive.htm
[William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is Director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation]
"Major General John Kelly is one of the Marine Corps' most thoughtful and most able leaders. Many who hope to see the Marine Corps' doctrine of Maneuver Warfare someday become real instead of just words on paper pray he has a bright future. When, as a major, he was commander of Infantry Officers’ Course at Quantico, he did what every Marine school director should do: he hauled all the old, Second Generation lesson plans out into the courtyard, poured gasoline on them and burned them. I have known him since that time, and I regard him as a personal friend.
In late September, speaking to the San Diego Military Advisory Council, General Kelly said:
I left Iraq three years ago last month. I returned a week ago after a two week visit of getting the lay of the land for my upcoming deployment. It is still a dangerous and foreboding land, but what I experienced personally was amazing and remarkable -- we are winning, we are really winning. No one told me to say that, I saw it for myself.
I have to reply, not so fast, John. I have no doubt the situation General Kelly found in Anbar Province is much quieter than it was just a short time ago. That means fewer casualties, for which we are all thankful. But in the inherent complexity of a Fourth Generation situation, it does not mean we are winning. If we put the improved situation in Anbar in context, we quickly see there is less to it than first meets the eye."
As Lind continues to explicate, the current policy of engaging the Sunni factions is setting up a situation where Shia and Sunni factions may collaborate to overthrow the Baghdad government, which they consider is a puppet regime serving the will of the United States.
Iran has been supporting the current government in giving technological assistance, increasing trade and supplying electricity; for they do not want a more violent civil war to happen. Rather than dealing with Iran on the basis of our mutual interests in Iraq's stability , we are blaming them for fueling a civil war, which we, by our actions, are increasing the chances of.


Comments: 9
The Real Iraq We Knew By 12 former Army captains
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/15/AR2007101500841_pf.html
"It's the resistance, stupid"
Coalitions Washington didn't count on are growing in Iraq with formerly unlikely alliances between Sunnis and Shi'ites being made, and all are opposed to US super-bases, a federalized Iraq and oil thirsty occupiers in general