NEW CHAPTER - Corruption in Connecticut book-in-progress

It's the pretty boys with that'll get ya, nothing to hide. Everybody loves a hero. I can smell it, knew the area well, it's been a while. God I love this freedom. Funny how fiction is easy to believe and facts become delusional fantasies....

Criminals in the police office?

Criminals in the police office? He asked knowingly.

No, it's not criminals in the police office - but in the Fairfield County State's Attorney's office, the Fairfield County State's Attorney Jonathan Benedict among them. What I think is of particular public interest about my case is that it is not a routine or familiar case of criminal activity in law-enforcement. What is of particlar interest is the joining together of pubic and private attorneys to try to disguise a patent criminal act by attorneys at the Connecticut law firm Pullman and Comley and jointly engage in a campaign of witness intimidaton of me for bringing the crime to the attention of the law-enforcement agency. The combined public and private attorneys at high levels in the Connecticut legal system tried and continue to try to fabricate a case against me out of thin air.

This is business as usual in the state of CT courts. There are not too many case that don't involve perjury, forgery, coercion, fabrication of evidence etc.. Your case is not unique. Your problem is that you did something about it. Or tried to.

The BAR associating is a single organization and they all work together. In what I've read from a few of your chapters they are trying to get the police involved. Just wait till someone assaults you and you try to flee without trying to defend yourself and don't strike back in any way. Even if you stay and let them beat you senseless you will be the one arrested. Prostitution and solicitation are favorite ones too because they will take your vehicle and if you had brought her back to your place your computer and whatever else they want. If you had taken that woman up on her "offer" you would be siting in prison right now. She would be a "rape victim" and is protected from committing perjury in court because you would have no right to confront her. The new unconstitutional "law" that was passed recently will have you found guilty in a heartbeat as it has removed every right that is supposed to be guaranteed according the the US and CT constitution. You will be appointed an attorney wether you want one or not and whenever you try to deny the accusations in court you will be told to "shut up" as you have an attorney representing you and therefore have no right to speak. The attorney won't deny a single accusation. It's called fabrication of record. Whatever is not denied in the court becomes "fact of record" so each time the judge reviews "the record" they see that you have some sort of mental incapacity and when you go to appeal these are now facts and evidence to be used against you.

ARTICLE XVII.

Section 8 of the article first of the constitution is amended to read as follows: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have a right to be heard by himself and by counsel; to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted by the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process to obtain witnesses in his behalf; to be released on bail upon sufficient security, except in capital offenses, where the proof is evident or the presumption great; and in all prosecutions by information, to a speedy, public trial by an impartial jury. No person shall be compelled to give evidence against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor shall excessive bail be required nor excessive fines imposed. No person shall be held to answer for any crime, punishable by death or life imprisonment, unless upon probable cause shown at a hearing in accordance with procedures prescribed by law, except in the armed forces, or in the militia when in actual service in time of war or public danger.

I'm sure these constitutional rights are being upheld right?. Every judge every day commits a crime called "affirmation or appearance of oath".

I know where the road your going down leads. It all depends on where you stop.

D.B.D.,

Yes, you're right on the mark. I haven't got to it in my book-in-progress yet, but I figure that they wanted to get into my apartment to get their hands on the evidence they know I have and destroy it. But, as a former chess player, I have managed to stay one step ahead of them. I was arrested once on a trumped-up harassment charge. It was intended to be another means of intimidation of me. But I defended myself pro se - and the case was dismissed with the agreement of the judge, the prosecutor, and the individual who filed the charges. My degree in philosophy has finally been put to some practical use. Thank you for your attention to my circumstances, accusations, and efforts. What you get into the picture in a necessarily sketchy, but apropos way is part of what I'm tryng to expose - namely, how the criminals and pathological individuals in the legal system so easily twist things because of the innocence, trust, and decency of the public. One last point - the criminal attorneys are not trying to involve the police, i. e., law enforcement personnel. They already have: The Fairfield County State's Attorney's office has become virtually their handmaiden in trying to further intimidate me and destroy evidence confirming the original crime of the theft of my medical films costing about $6,000.00. I'm going a lot more into such things at my blog henryberryinct.blogspot.com.

Or more accurately the mark is on me. It has been for over four years. I get the picture very clearly...

"Cause you can tell by the lines I'm reciting
That I've seen that movie too"
(taupin)

A leading role actually. I wish there was some way I could help but unfortunately it is a game of American roulette. It''s not a case of finding a good lawyer but rather a corrupt attorney. Defending yourself s a futile effort as you will try to bring fact and law into the court and according to them it does not belong there. "Not in MY courtroom"

That's what lots of people say. But actually, I've done pretty well as both a plaintiff and a defendant in court cases. As I mentioned, the harassment case against me was dismissed with the agreement of the prosecutor, judge, and person filing the complaint with me as the pro se defendant. In a civil case against the corporate law firm Pullman and Comley, the defendant attorneys sued for theft of property of mine and varied claims of legal malpractice had to forge documents, tamper with evidence, and submit perjured affidavits from themselves and another lawyer to try to win that case. When I exposed their crimes of the cover-up, they found a corrupt judge who commandered the case and threw it out on a technicality. I believe this judge, named L. Scott Melville at the Bridgeport (CT) Superior Court on Main Street, consulted with the attorneys on the cover-up; and then commandeered the case when his advise to the criminal attorneys went awry after I presented additional evidence exposing the forgery, etc. I believe this judge was bribed or given some compensation for his criminal role in abetting the crimes of the attorneys in the original crime of theft. I describe the judge L. Scott Melville as a local go-to judge for criminal attorneys. In my civil case based on violation of my privacy, an illegal wiretap, and a cover-up of the wiretap against the Fairfield County State's Attorney Jonathan Benedict (who was involved in the widely-publicized Michael Skakel murder trial), after he refused to turn over to me paperwork relating to the illegal wiretap upon my request for it, the judge ruled that he in effect was admitting my accusations of involvement in the illegal wiretap; which is a criminal, not only a civil matter. So Fairfield County technically now has a self-admitted criminal as its highest state law-enforcement official. But the citizens of Connecticut are used to this.

Anyway, the problems I have run into in the court system are not from representing myself pro se or factual issues or legal grounds, but corrupt individuals in the legal system itself. So I've turned to the media for exposing and dealing with the multifacted criminal and corrupt activity and many related individuals in the legal system I have run into.

"Anyway, the problems I have run into in the court system are not from representing myself pro se or factual issues or legal grounds, but corrupt individuals in the legal system itself.

I know. That is what the concern is. It's not that you'd be incapable of presenting a case it's that you may end up in front of someone who's nervous about what your presenting and how your presenting it. If you start getting documents refused for "want of form" you can be sure you are drawing the attention of someone who is trying to stop you from creating a record.

I wish you all the best.

Once again, I made a comment here and it was removed. It was not offensive.