Blame Dodd attacks Ignore Facts

First Ron, a "Ten" for being amusing.

Um, aren't the dems in control of both houses of congress? And, doesn't Obama have a highly competent, [chuckle] albeit tax cheat as Secretary of Treasury?

Here is the real truth. We elected an inexperienced incompetent as president, who doesn't know how to govern. His treasury secretary asked congress to remove language that would have prohibited these alleged egregious retention bonuses. Blame Dodd? Why, because he was the recipient of a sweetheart mortgage deal from Countrywide Bank, thus making him already corrupt? Oh no Ron, the blame for this circus must be put squarely at the feet of our president-in-training, who is obviously in way over his head.

But really, wasn't Obama's appearance on Leno great? Hey Barack, being president is really fun isn't it? Too bad we just can't rid of that pesky "governance" thing. LOL!!

One, no, they are not in "control" of the Senate, they don't have the magic sixty votes needed to be, and two, the article explains Dodd tried to limit them but was overruled by Treasury, who has to look at continuity of policy, among other things, and as we know, this did continue Bush policy on the Bailout bill.

As for truth, I'm not one that is convinced Obama can do anything God like, but he is a damned sight more palatable than the alternative we had...

We elected a President who has said repeatedly that ultimately HE is responsible for sorting out this mess. He's not playing the media blame game. He's looking toward what can be done to not let the irresponsible chit happen again. I saw that on Leno, that's for sure.

If Obama takes time to do a late night talk show, good for him! I enjoyed seeing him smile and joke, and remark about living in the bubble. It's about time we had a president who admits it's "cool" to ride in Air Force One. It's about time we had a president who realizes it's a PRIVILEGE to ride in style.

Get used to having an adult for POTUS.

And there is no excuse for bigger idiots like you, Lex.

Get used to having an adult for POTUS.
EM JAY ???? W., Mar 20, 2009, 8:57am EDT

Where, where? Oh I get it, you are obviously looking ahead to 2012 when we kick this youngster out of office---I'm right there with ya!

One, no, they are not in "control" of the Senate, they don't have the magic sixty votes needed to be, and two, the article explains Dodd tried to limit them but was overruled by Treasury, who has to look at continuity of policy, among other things, and as we know, this did continue Bush policy on the Bailout bill.
Ron (obstreperous savant) W., Mar 20, 2009, 8:23am EDT

Ron, come now, you don't actually believe this I know. Look, baby Barack just can't handle a real job. What he should have done if he was so "outraged" by these bonuses was to limit or eliminate them outright from the non-stimulus bill [by the way, still awaiting those "shovel ready jobs"]. He entrusted this task to the the tax cheat (you can't make this stuff up) treasury secretary, as if he knew what he [Geithner] was doing. Now to follow up on Em's advice, what really need are some real adults in Washington to save our country.

BTW, I loved Barack saying he was concerned about a sense of "entitlement" on Wall Street. Yeah, this from a guy who had experience in nothing riding the wave of affirmative action right into the White House! LOL! This guy really does deserve a regular gig on Leno.

Sounds like a counting of chickens, before they hatch, to me.

Well, your highly slanted opinion of Barack Obama is duly noted, but you know, I don't think everyone shares it....thank God.

I think we can accuse Dodd of a lot of things, but I definitely don’t want to “blame” him for the AIG mess we are in. Still it’s nice to see that waffling going on in a strange sort of way. First of all the real issue is a red herring; these retention bonuses were given long before the Federal Funds were given to the company. So the question is that in giving the funds, thus eliminating the problems of bankruptcy, were these bonuses given a better treatment than under current bankruptcy law, as amended in 2005?

“Retention bonuses paid to insiders are permissible only if: (1) the bonus is essential to the retention of the insider because the insider has a bona fide job offer from another business at the same or greater rate of compensation; (2) the services provided by the insider are essential to the survival of the business; and (3) the amount of the bonus is not greater than 10 times the mean retention bonus paid to non-management employees during the year in which the bonus is paid to the insider, or if no retention bonuses are paid to non-management employees during the year, the amount of the bonus is not greater than 25% of the amount of any retention bonus paid to the insider in the preceding calendar year.”

Frankly I’m angrier at the amount of money given to AIG to in effect bail out foreign banks than I am about the money given to guarantee retention (not performance) bonuses given in good faith a year ago. I’m angry at the “death threats” these people have received, including from members of congress!

P.S. For some reason even I don’t fully understand, I gave you a 10 as well. I’ll just blame Friday and call it a weekend.

"what really need are some real adults in Washington to save our country."

Your idea of "real adults", unfortunately, are the morons that put us where we are.

Thanks, Christopher. I'm awed.

Well, your highly slanted opinion of Barack Obama is duly noted, but you know, I don't think everyone shares it....thank God.
Ron (obstreperous savant) W., Mar 20, 2009, 9:12am EDT

Well Ron, his poll number are slipping, hence his appearance on Leno. This guy has to get out of campaign mode and grow up! Thankfully, responsible Americans see this.

Your idea of "real adults", unfortunately, are the morons that put us where we are.
Ron (obstreperous savant) W., Mar 20, 2009, 9:15am EDT

Yes, and a child shall lead us....right over the cliff.

Well, Kay, as we have entirely different ideas of what that cliff even is, and since your luminaries seem to have already done that, in my opinion, I think I'll stick with mine.

His poll numbers are normal, as the elected get down to actually dealing with governing, and a damned sight better than 30%, which is what your brain trust went out on, last I knew.

You might also want to take a look at Congressional Republican poll numbers, for a real indicator. Just sayin'

His poll numbers are normal, as the elected get down to actually dealing with governing, and a damned sight better than 30%, which is what your brain trust went out on, last I knew.
Ron (obstreperous savant) W., Mar 20, 2009, 9:26am EDT

Ron, as you know I wasn't a Bush supporter. Your guy Obama, ran on a platform of "saving" the country. He is doing a miserable job, unless you count an impending trade war, uncontrolled spending and cloudy foreign policy as "saving."

You might also want to take a look at Congressional Republican poll numbers, for a real indicator. Just sayin'
Ron (obstreperous savant) W., Mar 20, 2009, 9:30am EDT

?????? Hmmm, democrat congress. Perhaps the republicans can increase their poll numbers by actually blocking some of this mess, ya think?

Actually Kay, the public at large sees them as obstructionist, already, and that is precisely why their numbers have fallen, according to the polls.

"unless you count an impending trade war"

Free trade isn't free, and all you have to do is look around at our country, it's vanished manufacturing base, and the unemployment lines to get your eyes opened to the truth. Personally, I'd be more than happy to give up all the cheap WalMart Chinese lead based, melemine laced, crap, to get a few jobs back on US soil.

"uncontrolled spending"

I don't see anyone that could do the things we need to do that could do it without some deficit spending. Considering that we got here by massive deficit spending to finance Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, and a war we didn't even need to be in, for big oil, I take some comfort in the fact that Dems at least are doing it to try to help us, whereas Republicans did it to rape us for the benefit of their rich benefactors.


"and cloudy foreign policy"

OK, want to get into specifics here?

Oh God, Jim, don't get me started on Nebraska's Unicameral legislature. We don't want to go there, believe me. I lived there for a major part of my life, and I'm convinced I'm better off in the outback of Kansas.

"Apparently, if you're wealthy, Republicans protect you, if you're not...chit out of luck."

REALLY?! I never knew!

ROFL!

Well, Jean, I'm not just writing for the politically savvy, actually, I'm hoping some that didn't realize that will read, and understand it's truth, by the example, as well.

no surprise!

Great post, Ron W. A definite 10+. One of the very best ways to evaluate the worth of a post is to see how many outrageous responses you get from the right wing. You took first prize! As far as Obama's ratings, he continues to be waaaaay up there where he should be. He's doing a great job and all Americans need to support him.