Should homeschoolers participate in public school extracurricular activities such as sports and athletics? That’s what a bill soon to be introduced to the Florida legislature will allow, if passed. The bill honors Tim Tebow, a homeschooler who is now a Florida Gators quarterback. While he was being homeschooled he was allowed to participate in a high school sports program.
However, whether other Florida homeschoolers will be welcome is still a matter of debate. Some say that homeschoolers might overwhelm the athletic system; they express concern about academic standards and costs such as liability insurance. Someone even brought up the idea that students ineligible for athletics would use homeschooling to get back on their teams.
“The whole objection is based on the fact that these students have chosen homeschool over public school,” Rep. Jeremy Oden said. “But our argument — and my argument — is that the tax dollars from these individuals’ moms and dads pay goes to these institutions.
Other extracurricular activities may be included, including music and arts programs. Homeschooled students in Florida must register with a legal umbrella that has curriculum approved by the state, so academic standards should not be questioned, according to Oden.
My opinion on this is divided. Though I’m totally in favor of the separation of school and state, I know from my years of homeschooling that entry into some public school programs may be a necessity for many students. Where I live, in a very small town, there are few other opportunities for children to do anything with other kids. Exclusion from public school programs, even the dances, was a real problem for us. Though I’d like to see all public schools disappear forever, it is a sign of the times that I’m in favor of this bill. So long as the society allows public education to dominate, homeschooled students should be allowed to participate in the programs their family pays for.
Source: Florida Homeschool bill revisited by Evan Belanger of the Cullman Times
This article is also being published in my blog: Independent Homeschooling


Comments: 22
I noticed in your personal comments that you put you would rather see the public schools shut down? My question is what would you replace them with? I believe if all educational opportunities where private then the disparity in the quality of education would be worse than it was when our schools were racially segregated and then I do not believe that home schooling existed on such a wide scale then. If you feel your children are missing out on opportunities then maybe you should consider putting them into the public schools.
We are trained to be dependent on government handouts from the time we enter public kindergarten.
We who support the Alliance for the Separation of School & State believe that children should be homeschooled or educated in private schools. We also believe that those who cannot afford private education should receive scholarships from private organizations.
My motivation for homeschooling was that I wanted to spend all my time with my kids, educating them in the things they most wanted to learn about. Also my daughter was in a special education school and desperately needed to be out of that situation. Homeschooling was a wonderful adventure for us.
(My daughter graduated from highschool a few weeks ago; my teenage son is in public school now.)
While I have been home on maternity/family leave, we have homeschooled our oldest son. He is thriving at home! I am scheduled to return back to the classroom in September. There is still plenty of time to make final decisions, but I am not excited at all about the prospect of leaving my children.
Nicely done article, congratulations - I am featuring this article in The Educators Review!
And Braxton.. why do you ask?
I believe physical education and team sport participalting is important for all children, so if there aren't any public playgrounds or other resources, then the child should be allowed to participate on the team of their "district" school.
In cities like mine where most of the public schools are charters, I don't see how that system can work fairly since al l the home schooled students are going to want to choose the school that has the best team.
I am in favor of allowing homeschoolers access to after-school programs, and I believe that many strong opinions to the contrary reveal a desire to exclude homeschoolers - not the other way around. In fact, if I were to engage in the very unfair and unproductive practice of mind-reading the motivations of large groups, I'd say this faction is bitter about my choice to homeschool (but not bitter at all about taking my tax dollars) and if I won't capitulate to someone else's idea of what it is to educate my child then, I don't get to play with their marbles at all! But that would be unfair and unproductive, wouldn't it?
Why would you want your children to participate in those activities with the children that you don't want them in school with?
I am a homeschool mom.
I home school because my children are recieving a much better education from me than they can from the Department of Education. An entity cannot teach my child in a way that I find satisfactory. This has nothing to do with extracurricular programs. Educational learning and football, baseball and soccer have nothing in common. Why in the world would anyone think they do? Let's go another route: Let's assume that most parents home educate because they know they can do it better. Testing scores, educational bees, and honor societies validate that claim. However, they cannot place their child on a football field or baseball diamond and get the same results as a team. Is that more clear to those of you that correlate the two? They do pay the taxes that pay for both. Why should they be charged MORE when they aren't taking from the system educationally? That makes no sense.
But, I would warn home schoolers to be careful with the tax arguement. ALL citizens living in that district pay educational taxes, including singles, the elderly and people without school age children. That is a straw man arguement, at best.
Besides, there are much better ways to socialize your kids than public or private schools. Those making the arguement that home schoolers aren't socialized are, once again, showing their ignorance in understanding the home schooling process. Actually, it's been noted by several upper level Universities, including Harvard, that their home schooled students integrate better into campus life and show a much higher level of maturity and academic concentration.
I believe that home schoolers should be allowed to participate in public school sports if the parents choose to place them there. I think it's blatant discrimination to not allow them into the sports programs. Should someone in the special programs be refused admittance? After all, they're taking more of the tax dollars than anyone else, right? Should children who take remedial classes be excluded? They may make A's, but it's only in remedial classes, right? Of course not! It's called discrimination and the public schools are TERRIFIED of home schoolers. We test better, our kids don't act out in the same way, we have a much higher graduation level and we have huge numbers that continue their educations after high school. That makes them look bad and they exclude us from anything they can.
We're excluded from the Beta Club and National Honor Society, as well. But, we've founded our own with even higher qualifications than the public system. Our societies are recognized by every University in the US. As is our National Home School Debate Team, which will be on Fox before the November Presidential debates. I'd think, with those records, it would be more beneficial to develop our OWN home school sports teams. All indications point toward home schoolers doing better in every thing that they've tried outside the publicly funded system.
That's not being rude, that's just statistical facts.
Any parent who chooses to home school, does so for whatever reason. All reasons are surely valid. However, when that choice is made to home school, the parent also chooses to not participate in school activities. If you want your child to participate in sports, there are programs run by each city or town to accommodate such needs. Little League Baseball is NOT a school related activity, Pee Wee Football is NOT a school related activity. I hope you understand that you don't need to join the public school system for sports, for your children to participate in these activities.
IF THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF YOUR CHILD, NEITHER SHOULD THEIR SPORTS OR ANY OTHER EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITY.