I had hoped to arrive at City Lights an hour early to get a seat and read from Tales of the Out & the Gone before Amiri Baraka's reading. With a holiday bus schedule (and at least one missed route), I was only 40 minutes early and the chairs were all filled. I managed to secure a place on steps against the doorway through which the author would enter, and still managed to read almost half the stories in the collection and the introductions to the two parts ("War Stories," contains longer and more-or-less realistic stories written between 1974 and 1985. the second 60%, "Tales of the Out & Gone" consists of mostly wispy, sci-fi tales.)
The other side of the doorway was kept clear until the start of the reading--when it was occupied by a bodyguard in a black leather jacket just like mine. During the wait, Lawrence Ferlinghetti came through and stepped on my foot en route to the office mezzanine overlooking the reading space.
Baraka is 73. His shoulders were hunched, making him look even shorter. I thought that another bantam, Spike Lee, might look like this in another quarter century. Baraka seemed quite amiable, and funny (albeit frequently sarcastically so), not the fierce Black Nationalist/black Muslim of the late 1960s.
Baraka was introduced by Jack Hirschman, who presented him a copy of a tome of his own writings. Baraka said he was delighted that he still had elders (Hirschman and Ferlinghetti) and recalled the multi-force rejection of academic, Latinate poetry during the 1950s, including the Beats, Frank O'Hara, Black Mountain poets, et al. He recalled being the night librarian while in the Air Force stationed on Puerto Rico during the 1950s and feeling that "Howl!" showed that poetry could grab readers. This led to his legendary letter to Allen Ginsberg written on toilet paper, "Are you for real?" and the reply (written on better, French toilet paper) that he was and a list of other poets that led to the magazine Yugen, which he and his white wife Hettie produced (he did not mention her, but her own account is available in the superb memoir I Was Hettie Jones).
Without ever looking up, he read the first and oldest story from Tales of the Out & the Gone, "New and Old." Having returned to Newark in 1967 and worked to elect black officials, Baraka's home was invaded by policemen, his (second and appropriately black) wife held at gunpoint, because they heard that he was torturing a policeman on the third floor. That experience is not in the story, but the bitterness that a change in the color of the faces was only a change in the color of the faces, not policies or urban life is quite explicit: "black faces in high places, but the same rats and roaches, the same slums and garbage, the same police whippin' your heads."
The next story, "Neo American" from 1975 also slams the mayor Baraka helped elect, as the mayor (Kenneth Gibson, herein called Goodson) frets about a visit from a Republican president (W fits as well as Gerald Ford, who was then president): "The president comes--he gotta get security. And the city gotta pay for it. It's a hell of a thing, him a Republican and this city full of black Democrats" and "It's a heck of a lot of work running a big city. Especially one like Finland Station, with a half-million people--almost 400,000 of them black or Puerto Rican. With a bunch of big mouths floating around on the edge of that, playing like leaders, always stirring some bullshit up."
Someone indelicately asked about the murder two years ago of Baraka's daughter. He told the story.
He also told of watching Venezuela's president Chaves spend 6+ hours as a queue of people who wanted to speak to him did so (once upon a time, this happened in the White House, but now presidents are kept in bubbles and anyone with contrary views is kept away as a threat to "security"). He also remarked that "Homeland Security" sounds like it was back-translated from German, where it would be a single word (heimatsikerheit?).
Asked about the N-word, he agreed that it is overused, now, and, along with "dog," is used by young black men to vaccinate themselves... and is inadequate for the m__f___ Clarence Thomas. Not surprisingly, he did not think that having "colored" Secretaries of State improved murderous US foreign policy and lying about matters such as waging war in Iraq. Senator Obama he characterized as "very slick," and the best candidate running, but emphasized that that was faint praise.
He also reminded the audience that slavery and the Middle Passage were sustained policies of terrorism, and laughed that the governor (Jim McGreevy) who made him Poet Laureate of New Jersey (before the legislature abolished the position because he was in it) is making a lot of money from his memoirs.
Asked about the African American Beat poet Bob Kaufman, Baraka praised the poetry that he thinks should be better-known and more widely read, but sighed about Kaufman's belief that hanging out with the Beats would keep him from being beaten-up as an "uppity n_____."
The Book
Alas, Tales of the Out & the Gone is pretty insubstantial with many unsatisfying "stories. "The first 40%, "War Stories," contains longer and more-or-less realistic stories written between 1974 and 1985. the second 60%, "Tales of the Out & Gone" consists of mostly wispy, sci-fi tales.
Baraka said that as a youth he consumed Bradbury and Heinlein, and read all of Poe at age twelve. Poe with more directly sexual content seems the influence on the story I like best, "Norman's Story." It is one of few in the collection that was previously published (in Playboy) and was an attempt to write a story that would make some money. This information makes me feel that my tastes are convention (and commercial?!), but I think that it is a very well-constructed tale by a serviceman to his buddies of an ultimately terrifying sexual encounter that is reminiscent of Baraka/Jones's most famous work, the 1964 play "Dutchman."
Plot also matters in "Blank," though in relatively few of the other stories ("Blank" refers to amnesia), but not in some of the politically focused stories in the first section.
"Mondongo," reaching back to his Air Force days in Puerto Rico and a friendship between his alter ego Johns and a Jewish friend (Laffawiss ) who shared literary interests, undercuts the anti-Semitic rap to a degree (but falls into the suspicious "Some of my best friends" counter-argument that usually runs the opposite direction). The two with shared homesickness for New York, go to a whorehouse together (though sexual politics are muted in contrast to some earlier LeRoi Jones works such as "The Toilet").
There are some almost wistful stories focusing on aging and death, "The New Recreation Program" and "A Monk Story." And some artful dialogue ("From War Stories" stands out in this regard). Alas, there are also many puerile wordplays (outtelligence, undug, overstand, WaBenzi [black Mercedes drivers]), the kind of purple prose some consider "poetic," and only mildly amusing fantasies ("Rhythm Travel" is the best, the "clothes ray" and the "pig detector" might amuse others).
When he was LeRoi Jones, he was good at beginnings and endings, but could also riff be-bop prose (The System of Dante's Hell. which was more a collection of stories than a novel). Rather than that he can't do them, I think that he can't be bothered with doing them, but this reduces his audience--readers, that is, City Lights had turn people away half an hour before his scheduled appearance--and inside was jammed and soon hot.
He did not object to signing old books (he has published more than 40, though most are out-of-print, particularly those from mainline publishers).
copyright 2007, Stephen O. Murray


Comments: 42
Baraka is far from the only one who considers the Zionist state to practice apartheid, though the US media probably better covered what black South Africans had to undergo than it does how Palestinians are treated in the equivalent of Bantu reservations in the old South Africa. You may recall that the "Zionism is racism" statement was approved by a large majority of the UN General Assembly. The knee-jerk labeling of critics of Israel's treatment of Palestinians and the Israel lobby's inordinate influence on US foreign policy (on which see http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html) as anti-Semitism is becoming less and less credible along with the neo-con militarism of the Bush junta in the Middle East.
It is quite striking that so lengthy a comment could be written within 2 minutes of my posting!
Baraka's Black Nationalist period was long ago and brief. He was quickly disillusioned, as I think is quite clear in my posting by Gibson and his like. By 1970, he had begun to consider class more important than race.
And if you (Mitch R) read what I wrote instead of salivating (posting) at the bell-tone of the name, you'd have seen my questioning of the "Some of my best friends are___" (implicit) defense. I think his 9/11 poem has some nonsense in it, but he did not read it nor did he discuss Israel or Jews in his local appearance last night. You might also have noticed a preference for what he wrote as LeRoi Jones to that he's been writing as Amiri Baraka.
Think I'll grab some pop corn...
abolish the Electoral College
abolish the Senate
end winner-take-all elections
end private financing of elections.
(In that the Senate curbed Bush, I am especially reluctant about that change, and am concerned that fraudulent returns in one place would have a much greater impact with a popular vote, and a general concern about unanticipated consequences of social engineering.)
that one I am all for without hesitation
Great article and great REVIEW. You "should" take umbrage.
I've made comments at articles [Clarke M, in particular, because he has extensive knowledge and experience on the palestine-israel issues and have been barraged by hateful language and specious reams of selective facts when all I wanted to to do was voice an opinion. We're all entitled to our opinions and our personal experiences are all valid. I particularly look for pieces that contain information which prompt me to "think" about issues from a different perspective. Others seem to like repetitive pap spoonfed to them. To be "fair and balanced" it does seem to me that the spoonfed are the most obnoxious. Heh heh heh.
"Anti-Zionist = Anti-Jew"
What utter nonsense. Zealotry.
I know of none
"Anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews Protest AIPAC Conference - Feb 2007"
http://www.nkusa.org/
"There are in fact many Jewish movements, groups and organizations whose ideology regarding Zionism and the so-called "State of Israel" is that of the unadulterated Torah position that any form of Zionism is heresy and that the existence of the so-called "State of Israel" is illegitimate"
http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/
"Although there are those who refuse to accept the teachings of our Rabbis and will continue to support the Zionist state, there are also many who are totally unaware of the history of Zionism and its contradiction to the beliefs of Torah-True Jews"
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
Now you do.
As I already noted, there are Israeli Jews who are analogous to white South African supporters of the ANC during the apartheid regime. Many of these criticize the "Greater Judea" and post-1967 occupations. There is also considerable disagreement about who counts as a "Jew," and ethnic vs. religious Jewishness. Insisting that everyone who is anti-Zionist is a "Jew hater" increases anti-Semitism, which genuinely is on the rise in Europe and North America.
I would invite Mitch to recycle ADL propaganda in his own posting and read what others write before pasting in pre-existing hit pieces.
And thanks to John for some links to organizations of Jews critical of Zionism.
Now you've also reminded me that I should drop him a line and let him know how I've been lately.
As for all the comments about Amiri's supposed anti-Semitism...
I'll agree that he does make a lot of outrageous comments referring to Jews in far too general of a sense. For a man of such wit and wisdom, he does have a way of angering people greatly when he speaks. But I still don't believe that he truly hates any race or religion.
Some of you claim that his message has changed with the time but racism from beginning to end says he hasn't.
Now, if you find some other meaning in his work that speaks to you personally and can forgive hes hate speach in context of the larger work fine. But to say that his language is not racist is only speaking falsehoods. I for one can not seperate the racist rhetoric from his larger message. This conversation has moved away from the whole point in the first place, the man writes and speaks hatred.
And since my critical assessment of the Bakara book that brought him here and account of what he said here has been hijacked by this nonsense, I'll add that I do not think that Israel has a right to exist. I also do not think that the United States has a right to exist nor France nor Germany nor China nor Iraq, et al. A whole lot of borders have changed during my lifetime and in the 5 years preceding it. I believe that Israel has the right to defend itself and that our own house (the USA) is far from being in order. Moreover, Israel's neighbors are also apartheid states deserving of much criticism, but the national interest of Israel is not coterminous with the national interest of the US. My view on these matters has not been influenced by Amari Baraka's writings of 40+ years ago, since I had not read anything before the current story collection bylined "Baraka" (only what was published under his earlier name "LeRoi Jones"). The only Jew I noticed in the collection (in a story dating from 1975) is one with whom the author's alter ego was a friend back in the Air Force in Puerto Rico.
I'm not going to take on faith that someone who claims that Jews=Zionists that the quotations from Baraka are accurate or are presented as his views, nor am I set to read the 35 books he has written than I have not read. Which does not mean that I am defending what is for me a "pig in a poke."
You said: "This is exactly why I avoid this issue. Because the minute anything is said that can be remotely perceived in the slightest way as anti israel, you're automatically branded an anti semite and nothing you say or do will remove that mark.
It's a shame that these things can't be discussed rationally... "
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't this how Hitler and other fascists come to power? Because "they" were secret [and use propaganda] and "we" were silent? Why were ordinary germans and the rest of the world silent for so long after everyone "knew." Why were we silent on Iraq? Why are we silent on Darfur? "Strategic and other best interests" trump all else -- then comes fear. Was it one of the Bush's [Prescott?] who did business with the Nazi? Who's the man behind Halliburton? WWII was BIG business. Iraq is BIG business, and also a huge folly.
"Right to Exist" - code for "forget it". Condaleeza Rice uses it regularly -- along with the words "mushroom cloud" and "nonconstructive" and "regime." I imagine Iran is more than a bit nervous -- even though the world is speaking out of at least one side of its mouth.
JC chief Peter Pace used the word "stuff" to describe the things they found when they broke into the embassy in Irbil. Fancy that, finding Iranian "stuff" in an Iranian consultate in Iraq -- the two governments do have close relationships with one another of all kinds. After all, we supply Israel with "stuff" like cluster bombs.
Perhaps we need to speak up about all kinds of "stuff."
An exellent article , and some interesting comments, Matthew L. Lubin's for one. I appreciate being remindie of Amiri Baraka, and learning somethings I didn't know about his life and work. As for Mitch R., his arrogance in claiming to speak for "all Jews" is about all he brought to the discussion.
Off the real topic again, or is it? Isn't the crux here who is defining the concept, "right to exist?"
Mitch, yes I have met many jews who want to re-examine just what it means to co-exist with the Palestinians in a peaceful manner and in peace with other neighbors in the region. And, I believe you know that.
You said back to me: "However if you read what I said fully you'd see where I said that the reason this can't be discussed is because of the emotional and irrational mentalities that come to the fore. I never said they shouldn't be discussed and if people can try and remove their bias and at least attempt to have an objective discussion, I'd be all for it. But they can't and more imprtantly, and sadly also, they WON'T."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, if it came out as an attack. My precise point, apparently not commnicated so precisely as I had thought, is that one should nevertheless raise the issue and ask the questions. Those who don't want to be engaged have the perogative of not doing so [I exercise that perogative quite frequently myself]. On the other hand, there are those like Baraka and those who are perhaps not so controversial as Baraka who do feel compelled to look at and raise the issues on both side. "Fear" of the propriety or not of a discussion shouldn't be the determining factor -- unless one finds oneself at Cousin Susie's wedding and it would cause a great unnecessary and inappropriate fuss. That is, perhaps we agree that sometimes we tippy toe around and sometimes we must decide whether is reasonable to have a discussion with a rock.
And you did that quite nicely and effectively. Your article makes me wish I had been there. A slice of living history. [City Lights used to be one of my favorite places.] I have read some of Baraka's work. He's interesting in his own right and his transition from Jones to Baraka.
David,
We're not communicating, but it doesn't matter. Somehow, I think Jones/Baraka would understand, but it's Stephen's article.