The fate of a U.S. Army medic who went AWOL rather than return for a second tour in Iraq is unclear today after he turned himself in to military authorities.
Attorneys for Augustin Aguayo filed new appeal papers requesting his immediate release from military service as a conscientious objector approximately 30 minutes before the 34-year-old father of two presented himself at Fort Irwin in California's Mojave desert.
Aguayo had been in hiding since early September.
He first applied for discharge as a conscientious objector in February 2004, about a year after his Army service commenced and as he was beginning his first deployment in Iraq. Aguayo's application was denied by the Pentagon and in 2005 he appealed that decision to federal courts in Washington, DC, which have jurisdiction over cases brought by U.S. military personnel stationed overseas.
"When he joined the military he was very enthusiastic about doing something wonderful for our country," his wife Helga Aguayo told OneWorld. "It was through his experiences in the military that he made the decision to become a conscientious objector."
Before Aguayo's appeal could be heard, however, his unit was sent to Iraq again. So Aguayo escaped through a window in base housing and fled rather than face a second tour. He maintains military commanders told him they would send him to Iraq in handcuffs, if necessary.
"He just walked off the base," said David Spitzman, the former director of the Military Counseling Network, a non-military group of organizations that advocate for GIs in Germany where Aguayo was stationed.
Spitzman says the logistics of going AWOL were easy for Aguayo, as they would be for any of the 70,000 U.S. servicemen and women stationed in Germany.
"We all know that Europe has been critical of the war so finding supporters among local activists and normal citizens is easy," he said.
Sptizman said while Aguayo is the only serviceman based in Germany to speak publicly about his decision to go AWOL, he's hardly the only U.S. soldier to leave the military illegally.
"I wouldn't want to quantify it," Spitzman said. "But we get a lot of calls. Out of the 300 people who've contacted us at least 20 or 30 people have asked about going AWOL."
A U.S. Army spokesman at Fort Irwin told OneWorld that he wasn't sure what authorities would do with Aguayo now that he has turned himself in. "He might be arrested on the spot," spokesman Augustin Rodriguez said, "but I couldn't really say."
Under military rules, soldiers who have gone AWOL are only certified as deserters if they have been gone for more than thirty days. Aguayo went AWOL on September 2, so it is possible he could still be forcibly sent to Iraq to fight alongside his unit.
"Our primary course of action is to attempt to rehabilitate the soldier, reintegrate him/her back into their unit," Major Nathan Banks told Cybercast News Service earlier this month. "Very few deserters are tried by court martial--only 176 in fiscal year 2004. Each case is evaluated on its own merit."
Observers say these developments are reminiscent of the Vietnam War, when the refusal to fight by hundreds of thousands of soldiers was a major force behind U.S. withdrawal.
According to journalist and Vietnam War resister Peter Laufer, 170,000 U.S. soldiers filed for conscientious objector status during the Vietnam War. Between 50,000 and 60,000 fled to Canada. Others deliberately injured themselves or simply went AWOL.
The numbers are smaller this time around, but they're significant nonetheless, said Laufer, who has written a book about the phenomenon called Mission Rejected: U.S. Soldiers Who Say No to Iraq.
Soldiers who publicly refuse to serve "open doors to others who refuse quietly to themselves or have not made a decision," Laufer told OneWorld. "It's empowering for them to know they are not alone. Also, they are on the front line of the battle for the soul of their nation. They are a potent force to convince people who support the war. They are staking their freedom and future on these decisions."
At a press conference Tuesday in Los Angeles, Aguayo's family was joined by many supporters with military ties. Among them, Fernando Suarez del Solar, a 48-year-old cashier whose son Jesus became the first U.S. fatality of the war in Iraq when he stepped on a cluster bomb seven days into the invasion.
"When I see Augustin and other members of the military who refuse to go to Iraq, I believe my son is with him," he said. "More important is the family. Augustin defended his family. My son died and left behind my grandson and the family is destroyed."
"Augustin is a Mexican American like my son and me," he added. "For me, it's an honor to support him. It's very important for people to understand the Hispanic community shows the real patriotism. Immigrants come to this country to serve the United States, not to fight an immoral war in Iraq."
Aaron Glantz
OneWorld US
OneWorld is a global network of people and organizations that care about issues beyond their own borders. Subscribe to the free OneWorld Daily Headlines and Perspectives e-zine to Stay Informed and Get Involved.
|
by
OneWorld United States
Member since:
August 30, 2006 AWOL Iraq Vet Surrenders in California
September 28, 2006 12:26 AM EDT
(Updated: September 28, 2006 01:58 AM EDT)
views: 91
|
rating: 7/10
(3 votes)
|
comments: 21
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
You might also likeMore by OneWorld United States |
|||||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16836, "Oz"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 21
There are plenty of avenues available to get out of the service, unfortunately, he took the stupid approach by going AWOL.
If someone breaks into your house and steals your property, it's against the law and they should be punished. If someone goes AWOL, they break the law and they should be punished. Is that shameless naked, hateful, murderous rhetoric?
I'm sure One World appreciates your sympathy, however, I don't.
"Pure propaganda! Find one soldier and make him the poster child for this "Immoral War"!"
When looking at the media and the military an their chosen icon for any war , what types of characters emerge? Are they flat - good or bad, black and white- or are they rich and vibrant with complex histories and traits? What core American beliefs do they embody that molds them into iconic figures ? Is Aguayo an "alternative" icon ? How has the changes in the media landscapes from previous American coflicts influence the representations of soldiers coming out of Iraq ?
I am interested to hear everyone's take on these questions.
Elizabeth, My icons are ALL those serving our nation today...regardless of status in society, regardless of race, regardless if its the military service, peace corps, habitat for humanity, etc. As far as core beliefs...honor, courage, committment, integrity, just to name a few.
Is Aguayo an "alternative icon"... I think not. If he were truly a CO, then why did he join in the first place?
I have to agree w/ Thomas. I am sure you have some good points in your head. However when all you throw out terms like "nazi, murderous rhetoric", we have no idea on what you are talking points are.
Before you tell me to "go join the army", let me say I am for w/ draw from Iraq. However, the big question is should you prosecute someone who goes AWOL in an all volunteer army? Your argument is Bush and Cheney did similar excursions so this fellow should also be excused.
"GEORGE BUSH: AWOL FROM THE NATIONAL GUARD 1972 (DURING THE VIETNAM WAR AND A DRAFT - 58,000 AMERICANS DIED IN VIETNAM)"
This is an assertion that has never been proven. As a result this assertion can be gratuitously disregarded.
DICK CHENEY - 5 DRAFT DEFERMENTS - HE HAD "OTHER PRIORITIES"
Was this morally right? Probably not. Was it legal? Yes.
. So the big question, should this guy be let off the hook? From a legal point of view he signed a binding contract and by going AWOL he violated his contract. . I would love to hear your arguments as a defense attorney on why this guy should get a free pass.
Purely objective people require facts as proof before they will believe anything (they are not all living in Missouri). So how is it that so many believe in God when that can never be proven either? I guess the thought should be 'gratuitously disregarded'..? (makes hypocrits out of many evangelicals, but what else is new)
Such thinking is typical of the right to take a small more provable or is disprovable issue, whichever best fits their agenda, and use it to smoke screen their way out of the important issues that are not questionable ... such as the way a date was typed onto a paper in the case of GWB's going AWOL ... yeah, right ? It is called 'OBFUSCATION' folks. One of the right's most used tools.
As to integrity and honoring contracts, their view seems pretty one sided there also ... what else is new in the world of one sided views? ... They conveniently do not look to the government they support (Republicans) as to any wrong doing ... no, never could they be guilty of anything ... I would say give me a break, but they never would ... unless you were like minded (one of 'theirs'). As for their government ever saying one thing then doing another, it would only be the demos in their minds that would ever do that ... according to them, that is always the case.
So along comes a naive young man that watches all the fancy adds on TV and decides to serve his country, and does in fact, only to find that he had been lied to about what it was he was to be doing ... up holding and defending the honor and integrity of his nation ... then finding that he had been lied to all of his life, that his 'leaders' had duped him and most others about what was really going on in the world ... then I guess he is supposed to put the truth out of his mind and ... 'continue the course' ... I think that some are intelligent enough to question enough to see the errors of their leadership ... evidently not the loyal patriotic nationalistic republicans who would thoughtlessly support their contract to such leaders no matter what they were told to do ... yet somehow I think even a rare few of them are too smart for that ... but not the bulk of them that so 'honorably' castigate the likes of the man at issue here.
There are free thinkers and individuals in this world that look at the larger picture and have compassion for their fellows, they are the liberals and progressives.
The others are the judgmental, always right, fighters (usually only verbally) of their legions of self described adversaries (their stated enemies), all the rest of us that will not be led by miscreant leaders.
I could and would say much more, but those of us on 'this' side already know all of this, and the ones that need to wake up, never will until it hurts to much to ignore. But by then it will be too late for them, trapped in their own idiocy.
You state: "It is called 'OBFUSCATION' folks. One of the right's most used tools." Well if its being obfuscated, then why can't you clear out all that smoke and mirrors and defend it based on fact. Seems the only obfuscation I see on a daily basis is that coming from the left.
I read your comments and all I can say is "huh"?
This is not a right vs left issue. The question is should Agustin Aguayo be persecuted for going AWOL. I tried to follow your argument and all I got is :
"naive young man"
How do you know he is naïve?
"lied to all of his life"
Again, how do you know this personal information? Did you grow up w/ him?
"then I guess he is supposed to put the truth out of his mind"
Dude, what are you talking about?
"There are free thinkers and individuals in this world that look at the larger picture and have compassion for their fellows, they are the liberals and progressives."
Huh?
Jerry, can you restate your talking points but phrase it from a legal point of view.
on September 30, 2006 Army Specialist Agustín Aguayo, 35, was to report for duty at the U.S. Army base in Schweinfurt Bavaria at 7:30 pm German time (1:30 pm EST) to begin a second year-long deployment to Iraq
A medic with the U.S. Army 1st Infantry Division to Iraq, Agustín is orginally from Los Angeles, where his family still lives.
Agustín did not report for duty as ordered. According to his wife, Helga Aguayo, and his counselor, Michael Sharp of the Military Counseling Network in Bammantal, Germany, Agustín plans to turn himself in to the Military Police on the base in Schweinfurt soon. He anticipates that he might receive a court martial followed by up to two years in military prison, loss of all benefits, and perhaps a less than honorable discharge. For him and his family it will bring a long separation and definite economic hardship for years to come. But he sees no other way.
Agustín has stated that he would refuse to deploy on grounds of conscience (see attached statement). He joins a growing group of U.S. soldiers who are refusing to deploy to Iraq. His is the first publicly known case of a soldier refusing to deploy from Germany to Iraq. Approximately 67,000 U.S. soldiers and 80,000 of their dependents are stationed on 73 bases in Germany, a key logistical hub for the U.S. military effort in the Middle East.
If he must face court martial, Aguayo will be represented at trial in the U.S. military court in Germany by a German attorney, Christian Rieker of Frankfurt. In a joint project of the Military Task Force of the National Lawyers Guild, the GI Rights Hotline, and a German attorney organization, the Republikanischer Anwaeltinnen- und Anwaltsverein (RAV) which was coordinated by Elsa Rassbach of American Voices Abroad (AVA) Military Project, several English-speaking German attorneys were trained this past January in U.S. military law to represent U.S. soldiers stationed in Germany. Aguayo will in addition be represented by appointed U.S. Army counsel.
I had two deferments before entering the service in 1969; of course they were for being in school. Was that morally right?