Minnesota Public Radio's Midmorning ran with the intriguing show, Writers rate the greats:
A book critic asked more than 100 of today's most well-known writers what they think are the top 10 greatest literary works of all time, and got some interesting responses. Midmorning discusses and debates the literary top 10.
If you missed the live show (like I did) you can catch the audio archive on the Web. Better yet, you can catch the discussion right here.
Frankly, I'm skeptical. How can anyone decide on the top 10 greatest literary works of all time? Does it matter who "says" what the "top 10" are, or can anyone? Does someone's answer reflect on who they are as a reader and/or writer? Would you be more interested in your favorite author's answer or your close friend's list?
______________________
Julia Schrenkler
Minnesota Public Radio Interactive Producer
Show guests were
- J. Peder Zane: Book-review editor for the Raleigh News & Observer and editor of "The Top Ten: Writers Pick Their Favorite Books."
- Tom Perrotta: Novelist whose works include "Election," "Joe College" and "Little Children."
- Gail Godwin: Novelist whose works include "The Odd Woman" and "Queen of the Underworld."


Comments: 18
It's so subjective, and certainly, one's choices reflect who they are as a reader. I'd like to hear Tobias Wolff's list.
As far as whose top 10 I'd be most interested in, I'd be more interested in my favorite author's answer than my favorite friend's.
I have read a biography of F. Scott Fitzgerald and it referenced a lot of his favorite books. I have been trying to make my way through that list. I think it is interesting to see what books influenced writers, but as far as most important, it is too subjective. Also I could never make a list of just ten.
I heard one of the guests this morning mention Knut Hamson's "Hunger" -- it's on my list -- actually, on one of my shelves -- a copy that was translated by Robert Bly.
Speaking of translators, I love Tiina Nunnally's recent translations of Sigrid Undset's "Kristin Lavransdatter."
Okay, Fred Bals, you got me laughing with the way you worked in Dylan. For some reason his answer didn't surprise me! As to the offhand recommendation, I know what you're talking about. Sometimes there's almost an admiring product placement of sorts. Writers often give a tip of the nib to other writers by having characters read/gain inspiration from a work.
Awright, awright, Karen Lerner, I'll toss out Martin Eden. Talk about subjective, yeah? ;-)
Hmmm Kerry Dexter's questions are good. "...what books would you say have touched you/changed your life?" Whew. Let me think on that one.
Oh lawdy, Diana, I just shouted out Martin Eden [helplessly laughing] Please, no analysis. To your point, I'd love to hear what political candidates would list as the most politically influential.
Cynthia have I told you lately I admire your ability to devour books? I have yet to catch the audio.
Nabokov's "Lolita" is high on the Random House 100 best list. I love that book! A former MPR reporter/now NPR reporter Martin Kaste guided me through the puzzles and puns. It was a very fun read, but you have to be careful not to get too caught up in making moral judgements about the subject. Supposedly it is a parody of the academic world.
Think we could do a guided tour here in Minnesota Readers?
You've hit the nail on the head. I believe that one's top 10 picks say more about the picker than the books. However, if you added some compartmentalization to the question - for example, similar to Kerry's comment, which ten books were the most politically influential - there would likely be more consensus.
Thanks for the link. I missed the show but will listen to it on my computer.
;)
You could go by books that had the most impact on society, but then there were books that have been destroyed by people who concured certain areas and never looked at these books (although a few still do exist).
It is a very hard thing to honestly do, nearly imposible.
Lloyd aka Dr. Curmudgeon, haven't you mentioned the wild world of Academia before? ;-)
You're right, Dan. Sometimes I just imagine all the books that have been destroyed, lost, or never produced.
Still, certain books do come to the forefront in many lists, and Lolita seems to be one of them. My book group disbanded this year and I would LOVE a guided tour through this book. Actually, make that a moderated but energetic discussion. There are times I wish I was back in the college classroom benefiting from the group's insights.
I think all anybody can do is list the books they have LOVED, and then look at other peoples' lists to see what else is out there, and then read THAT stuff, too.
So, books I have loved...I won't say TOP 10, but first 10 that come to mind:
1. Angela's Ashes by Frank McCourt
2. Dark Tower Series by Stephen King (I'm cheating - 7 for 1 on that)
3. Chronicles of Narnia by CS Lewis (again - 7 for 1)
4. Rain of Gold by Victor Villasenor
5. 1776 by David McCullough
6. Anne of Greengables by Lucy Maud Montgomery (include the whole bunch)
7. Ladies #1 Detective Agency by Alexander McCall Smith (again...the series)
8. Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes
9. Snow Flower & the Secret Fan by Lisa See
10. Wicked and Son of a Witch by Gregory Maguire
So...two things I have discovered making that list.
I LOVE BOOKS! All kinds, all sorts. And by the way, I could have just listed "by Stephen King" as one, because I LOVE his books (mostly).
Second, I love series. I think that is because I love characters, so a character has more chance to grow and change and evolve over a long series of books.
Third, I could have typed about 100 more...kids books, adult books, silly books, books considered "not literature" (see Stephen King obsession), books considered great literature (love Brontes, love Austen, love Dickens, etc), modern, historical, fiction, non-fiction.
Isn't it thoughtful of so many wise and creative and funny people to have put all that stuff down so we can all read it and learn and laugh and share?