Hello Gather,
Since my radio program Speaking of Faith began, people have asked how I came to care about large questions of meaning, how I think about the dangers and promises of religion in human life, and how I see the world differently through my conversations across the world's traditions. This book is my response.
I am drawn to tell the whole story of religion in the world — beyond the headlines of extremism, behind the stridencies and doomsday theories that have characterized our public discourse about religion since September 11, 2001. Through the story of my own life and the adventure of radio conversation, I explore religious traditions as rich resources for our minds and spirits, as guides to our most important modern confusions, and as correctives for the excesses of religion itself.
This is faith as it works in the lives of the many, not in the debates of a few. It is an invitation to a new kind of conversation about the most important issues before us — left, right, and center — between the poles of competing certainties that have hardened our cultural discourse.
I look forward to speaking with all of you today to discuss matters of religion, meaning, ethics and ideas.
Tips For During the Chat:
To jump into the discussion, all you need to do is type your question in the comment box below (if you're not already a member you will need to join Gather in order to post a question). To see others’ questions and my responses in real time, simply hit the refresh button on your browser. You will need to refresh your page continuously to see each new comment.
Click on the links below to read excerpts from Speaking of Faith on Gather:


Comments: 84
My question for you is about divorce. In the Christian faith, the Bible is clear that divorce is okay in cases of adultery. Most modern day Christians interpret this as a two way street - if a man commits adultery, the wife has biblical cause for the dissolution of marriage and vice versa. The one committing adultery is an adulterer/adulteress and anyone who marries him/her thereby becomes an adulterer/adulteress also (of course there are always provisions for forgiveness since all people sin and can only through faith be saved).
I have explained how most modern day Christians biblically interpret divorce; however, I have heard that the original interpretation was that adultery is a sin committed only against a husband. In biblical times, the wife was considered the possession of the husband, and if another person had sexual relations with the man's wife, the wife was an adulteress and the husband was free to divorce her (not vice versa). Her partner would be considered an adulterer/adulteress also and anyone he/she marries would become an adulterer/adulteress as well. My question is whether this is accurate historically and I would be interested in your thoughts on the topic as well. If this is accurate historically, does that mean that contemporary Christians are inaccurately interpreting Jesus' words? What stigmas are attached to divorce in general contemporary faiths?
As an end note, for those who do pray, I certainly could use extra prayers for the coming weeks as I adjust to being single again and try to heal a broken heart. Please pray that I will have clarity, peace, healing, and wellness. I will be mainly offline for awhile as I get settled in my new place. Please also pray that the move goes smoothly and that I will sustain strength to do all I need to accomplish. Thank you!
I enjoy your newsletter especially, and really liked the points in the recent conversation on Exodus about myth being something that happens again and time again. working as I do in music (and having lived in Ireland), that's a definiton of sources in the tradition also. would you talk about your favorite music, and how that informs your explorations of faith? and are you a musician yourself?
I guess as a fairly new US citizen, I've sometimes felt like Americans put their faith in human institutions - in democracy, in the constitution, in the rule of law, or even in a particular interpretation of Biblical passages, etc. - and confuse that with faith in God. Religion and politics then inevitably get confused also. I've begun to think that might be a cultural thing, coming out of the way modern America came to be historically. How hard to you think it is to separate culture from faith?
My husband and I are great fans of your show and I highly recommend your wonderful book. Thanks for making a difference.
Is there a good way to frame a political issue like healthcare in a way that reflects "values" rather than partisanship? Especially in the wake of both a Democrat (Elizabeth Edwards) and a Republican (Tony Snow) currently dealing with cancer, I would like to hear something like this discussed on your program.
My wife and I are about to have a baby and are just beginning the conversation of how to raise him (I'm Jewish and she is Christian). Our religions didn't matter to us in terms of our marriage and neither of us attends services etc. but now that we are bringing a child into the world the subject has arisen. Do you have any advice for interfaith couples embarking on the journey of parenthood.
what a nice insight, and well phrased. thanks!
My niece just got engaged to a wonderful man. She is Jewish and her fiancee is devout Catholic. Now that they are starting to plan the wedding, there is dissension on both sides of the family as to the "what" and "where" of the ceremony. Any suggestions as to how to remedy the situation?
It seems recent mainstream entertainment has afforded people a vehicle to oppose established religious beliefs in front of a vast audience, particularly with Christianity. Films released in the last decade or two like The Last Temptation of Christ, Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ, and blockbusters like The DaVinci Code present ideas about Jesus that can run contrary to traditional teaching. Do you feel that questioning established dogma is a healthy way to explore our own personal faith, or is such "entertainment" leading to unhealthy factions among the faithful?
I'd recommend, first of all, Brother Thay - A Radio Pilgrimage with Zen Master and Poet Thich Nhat Hanh. This program is very special to us and to many listeners. A The Buddha in the World is an intellectually provocative conversation with a fascinating thinker, Pankaj Mishra - a take on the world by way of the social philosophy of the Buddha. Midwife to the Dying is with a Buddhist teacher who accompanies people to the final boundary of life and as a Buddhist has a take on this quite different from our culture's resistance to mortality. Those come to mind most readily. I hope you enjoy them!
Thanks so much for the thoughtful answer on raising a child in an interfaith marriage. I will definitely listen to the program you suggested. Are there any books on the topic that you would suggest as well?
I once heard a news piece about a study that was conducted on people's idea of "the perfect religion." Based on the responses of a focus group, the study found that what most people really wanted was spirituality, but not dogma or doctrine. In fact, what people wanted was basically a day spa experience, a church that made you feel good--centered, relaxed, clensed and at peace with the world.
Spa-culture and "wholesome living" has in some ways become an agnostic's religion. What are you thoughts on this type of spirituality? Can it be called spirituality?
I find it most helpful to use the word "faith" to describe an energetic helping PROCESS, because that's how it works.
When "faith" is used to describe one or more religious BELIEF SYSTEMS, that's not constructive, and it's also inaccurate.
Faith is something that can be increased through practical use, just as one can increase mental or muscle power.
Great chat! Thanks again!
Diana, Thanks for the referral here. You say: Is there a good way to frame a political issue like healthcare in a way that reflects "values" rather than partisanship? Especially in the wake of both a Democrat (Elizabeth Edwards) and a Republican (Tony Snow) currently dealing with cancer, I would like to hear something like this discussed on your program.
I, too would like to see such issues discussed from the perspective of "wholeness." Whatever happened to the simple concept of right and wrong. Not "black and white" and rigidly political and the expedience of doing what appears to be good for the constituency, right and wrong -- right and wrong from the most basic and ethical perspective of "what is the morally right thing to do" to resolve issues which fragment us from the "whole."
It seems to me that right and wrong can be just as divisive as black and white; as personal moral judgment enters into each of our judgments of right and wrong. For me, I think it makes sense for me to have my judgment of right and wrong for my behavior, but I don't think I can make the judgment of another's right and wrong. There are powerful examples - gay marriage, stem cell research, abortion, etc. - which different people apply different moral judgments of right and wrong. For me, it comes down to simply caring, caring about my family, my friends, my neighbor, my community, my country, my planet - just caring without judging.
I just wanted to say I am finally going through my currently over 6,000 pieces of gather new mail that is in my inbox on here. So with that in mind I have finally come to a piece of mail that was addressed to me in regards this article submission you have created to share with the gather community. Thank you for taking the time and sharing your piece with us here at gather. :o)