Imp's Report: Manual of Strategies for Discovery
"What do breakthrough scientists do that average scientists don't? What makes them different? I'm convinced that, famous scientist aren't any more intelligent than those who are not famous. I'm convinced that successful ones aren't right any more often than their colleagues, either. I believe that the architects of science are simply more curious, more iconoclastic, more irreverent, more persistent, readier to make detours, and willing to tackle bigger and more fundamental problems. Most important, they possess intellectual courage and daring. They work at the edge of their competence, their reach exceeds their grasp. As they stretch themselves, they stretch science. Thus, they not only succeed more often and out of proportion; they fail more often and on the same scale."
"I have never heard of anyone stumbling on to something sitting down. Once you begin to act, you make things happen. The more ways you "twist the lion's tail," to use Francis Bacon's term, the more you'll make it roar."
"Court serendipity by being eccentric. Your probability of inventing something different increases as your experience, hobbies, skills, knowledge, philosophy, and goals become increasingly unusual."
"Try many things. The search for scientific problems must be broad. Those who look in one place find one thing."
"Do what makes your heart leap. Listening to some scientist, one gets the impression that finding a research problem is like falling in love or going on an adventure."
"Scientists of any age who want to make important discoveries must study important problems."
"If an experiment does not hold out the possibility of causing one to revise one's views it's hard to see why it should be done at all."
"To raise new questions, new possibilities or, to regard old problems from a new angle, requires creative imagination."
"If the data doesn't fit the theory, ignore the data. (a comment to Heisenberg)"
"Renew old knowledge. Another source of rich ideas is previously plowed fields now abandoned."
"Truth comes from error more rapidly than out of confusion."
"Be sloppy enough that something unexpected happens but not so sloppy that you can't tell what happened."
Lord Dainton
"Cherchex le paradoxe. A common error among researchers is to ignore things that don't make sense."
"When the great innovation appears, it will most certainly be in a muddled, incomplete form. To the discoverer himself it will be only half-understood; to everyone else it will be a mystery. For any speculation which does not at first glance look crazy, there is no hope."
"No paradox, no progress"
"Revolutions follow the recognition of anomalies."
"Never try to solve a problem until you can guess the answer."
"Without speculation there is no good and original observation."
"Every day some beautiful theory is destroyed by harsh reality."
"Don't undertake a project unless it is important and nearly impossible. If it is manifestly important then you don?t have to worry about its significance."
"Do your own thinking. Accept nothing until you have satisfied yourself that there is no other way to think about it."
"It was certainly better to imagine myself becoming famous than maturing into a stifled academic who had never risked a thought."
Unknown
Don't be afraid to re-invent the wheel.


Comments: 18
As you see html doesn't past into gather.com
It is possible to edit out the code before you publish by doing a preview then, edit for your article.
And possibly more Obsessive Compulsive????
And they NEVER divide through by zero!
At the base of all these quotes is the same strategem:
KEEP DOING SOMETHING; DONT JUST SIT THERE!
Add my own thread, "don't be afraid to reinvent the wheel."
This piece is full of solecisms, typos, and poor usage. You probably ought to proofread thoroughly before posting. It undermines your credibility to be so sloppy in a public forum.
Gjerd
If this is all you have to say about these thoughts, I think you have too much time on your hands.
As for my time: yes, that extra minute proves that I'm a layabout. You've really got the measure of me. Such an insightful and reflective response to reasonable criticism.
Keep in mind only the typos are correctable. I don't presume to edit the scholars.
Forest apes survive to today. All the hominids of the African savanna died out except for humans. Why did only they survive out of all the others? A posible answer is they weren't there. They were in river deltas evolving on a sea food diet. This is why a sea food diet is so healthy. Because iodine was so plentiful during this evolution inland populations suffer iodine deficiencies more than adjacent animal peopulations. With fresh water always at hand humans need it on a regular basis during the day while their forest cousins only need to go to the water hole twice a day.
What does all this matter? It says humans evolved as beach combers turned fisher men rather than scavengers turned hunters. A more peaceful and cooperative social condition. Notions about evolution influnece people's thinking even if they claim they don't believe in it. In reading about educational standards one idiot stated that children tend to live up to or down to your expectations. This is the result of risen ape rather than fallen agel thinking. This is why notions about evolution need to be correct.
It's Albert Szent-Györgyi. Gyorgyi if you absolutely don't want to do the diacritic, though I think it would go through with copy and paste.
Thanks for the help on spelling. V below G on Qwerty keyboard.
The second quote of A.E. is from a poster I picked up at Hebrew University, Jerusalem and printed by Pomegranate Press. No. 868 - I have not been able to locate the original cite.
In addition I will differ with you that they are the same intellectually as other scientists. If you have a great ability like those scientists, you will want to beg to differ. Their edge intellectually will include a great long term memory, problem solving and problem finding abilities. These takes a lot of agile intellectual activity or neurological stimulation.
There is a difference between knowledge and wisdom. Anyone can acquire knowledge, not every can effectively or efficiently apply their knowledge especially when it is required for ingenuity. Only the process of an agile mind, someone that has a cause, all these can be found in the character of the individuals.