
Nationally, McCain is perceived to be forging ahead of Romney, with Romney possibly leading in California - or perhaps not.
Romney seems to be all but ceding New York and New Jersey to McCain, and is focusing on the Western states with large LDS constituents.
What do you think of tomorrow - Super Tuesday - in Massachusetts?
Do you think Massachusetts' former governor Romney will take the Republican vote on February 5th?
And what you do predict on the Democratic side?
Nationally, Obama is seen narrowing the gap led by Clinton. Do you think Clinton has found her political voice?
Baby boomer Democrats are regarded as favoring Clinton, especially the woman's vote. But the college vote is veering toward Obama.
How do you think this will play in Massachusetts tomorrow?


Comments: 110
Between Obama and Clinton? Yep, there, too.
McCain by fifteen.
My prediction? That many more will cast their votes for Dr. Paul than the numbers suggest. (In other words, his votes will not all be counted... unless someone forces the issue)
What about Romney in his former home state of Massachusetts?
The field of candidates may not be the best in the world, but I hope that everyone votes. My step- father won a Bronze Star in the Pacific during WWII and couldn't vote in his home town because of the color of his skin.
People you need to vote and never sit one out.
Well, these commentators are just doing their best to kill any chances that John McCain, who, like Hubert Humphrey in 1968 had to carry the baggage of LBJ and his Vietnam War - will be carrying GW Bush's baggage of the War in Iraq and an economy that is losing American jobs to Mexico and Asia and suffering a declining dollar, has of winning the Presidency.
Romney will not win because of latent suspicion of the LDS Church. Simple as that.
I'm looking toward Obama being the Democrat nominee, and to his winning the election. Vice President Clinton? Perhaps. But I don't think it'd be a good idea.
I hope EVERYBODY is voting tomorrow, if your state has a Primary tomorrow.
Brian, very sad about your stepfather. I worked for the NAACP in 1962,
Here's my prediction: The rethuglicans will vote for Huckabee, "cuz he looks jus like Jerry, down at the shoe-mart."
Well, it will be very interesting to see how this all plays out.
For me, here in Massachusetts - I think it will be Clinton and I am not sure. Perhaps a tight GOP race tomorrow.
I do know people here who say it will be
Romney, Clinton
McCain, Clinton
,
McCain, Obama
1. Can't wait :)
2. No. Although Romney is a good businessman, my vote is for John McCain.
3. As far as the Democratic Side, I don't even want to think about it.
4. Clinton needs to keep looking. She needs to tell hubby to back off because this is her turn to run. He already had his turn.
2. Yes.
3. shame
4. Whoever has Hillary's voice, please keep it hidden until after the election.
Nationally, it will be a very close race on the Democratic side.
My fear has been Pres. McCain. I've had that nightmare for a couple of years now.
Obama has a great voice and a warm, personal delivery.
McCain has a good voice and a believable style.
Clinton is getting hoarse. She had a great personal style not long ago when she loosened up, but who do I really want to listen to over the next four years?
I'm not even including Romney for my choice, even though he has a great voice and a personal delivery, I think you all know my feelings about him.
I have to say I do not really like listening to Hillary's voice. I'm voting for her but other candidates, in fact, all the other candidates have a better voice. She needs to loosen up.
So literally I am still not sure who I am voting for, but I know it isnt for him.
So that would leave Clinton, McCain in Massachusetts. Maybe. Or not.
This is a very hotly contested race, that's for sure.
Not like Carter in '76 - for whom people voted in droves because he was ABWG - Anything BUT WaterGate.
Not like Clinton in '92 because he was ABB - Anything but Bush.
Carter and Clinton for the Dems were a fresh face that literally swept the nation by storm.
You don't always see that.
LBJ's landslide over AuH20 was a popular landslide that has never been beat. That was ABB AuH20 and LBJ was the incumbent.
JFK's victory over Nixon was Jfk's appearance versus Nixon's five-o-clock shadow.
I think it'll be chaos with a cherry on top, Kathryn!
I'll post an article tomorrow with early results as soon as I get them, then update as necessary, then a final.
Massachusetts, that is.
1-If Hillary is the Dem's choice, McCain is the one who can beat her.
2-If the economy is the #1 problem we are facing, Romney is the one
3-It could be a Clinton/Obama ticket but would never be a Obama/Clinton ticket.
4-If Huckabee had dropped out Romney would be leading the polls. He's pulling conservative votes away from Romney.
What I think? I'm voting tomorrow for sure but I'm still not sure. Consciously I'm a conservative, subconsciously, I'm a liberal. My thinking goes against voting for Hillary or Obama--my liberal subconscious dictates McCain--my conscious/economic mind says "Romney", my spiritual side says Huckabee--anybody want to help me.????
Daivd: Yes, but a lot of people here are pretty upset with how Romney handled many things.
Nationally, McCain is ahead.
LISTENING TO OBAMA AFTER HIS VICTORY IN IOWA, I HEARD A GLIMMER OF THAT HOPE AND COURAGE. THE 60'S OUGHT TO BE OVER SOMETIME. AND SO SHOULD THIS AWFUL WAR. I CANNOT IMAGINE WHAT JOHN McCAIN AND HIS WARRIOR ATTITUDES WOULD DO TO OUR COUNTRY AND THE WORLD. PLUS ANY HOPE OF RETAINING A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO MAKE DECISIONS FOR HERSELF AND HER BODY WILL AGAIN SUFFER. THERE IS TOO MUCH AT STAKE FOR CYNICISM.
Student grassroots often go for Obama, so I expect him to do better than predicted and win.
Student grassroots often go for Ron Paul, and the other Republicans make me too sick to contemplate, so I'm going with my wishful thinking. I hope MA is not a Diebold state. On a blog the other day, a Canadian wrote in wanting to vote for Ron Paul. He asked if anyone knew how to hack Diebold so he could make it happen. He was making a joke I know, but people in other countries want somebody who promises not to mess with them.
Hey Lydia, at least we can mention Ron Paul on Gather without getting edited out. It's not Faux, here, yay!
(Ha!) Interesting conversation here...
Hillary is, like Obama (and that should be pronounced like Alabama, by the way), a freshman senator with no experience in economics, diplomacy, or any other area that a president of the United States should be seasoned in. She's all image and gamesmanship and as artificial as a three dollar bill.
The war is a perfect example to set these two up against. The US went to war in Iraq because Hussein had spent the past ten years defying UN sanctions and shooting at American war planes carrying out UN missions over Iraq. We were all fed up with it and popular opinion at the time was that we had put up with his defiance and arrogance much too long. International intelligence confirmed that Hussein was a danger to the region and Bush one of the reasons Bush went to war was to back the many threats the Clinton and Bush administrations had made each time Hussein defied the UN. America was seen by the rest of the world as a big blow-hard after years of threatening to enforce UN sanctions, then refusing to do it. Our credibility was shot. What a relief it was when we, with most of the rest of the world except for France and Germany and a couple of others, went in and took the madman out. Hillary did not oppose going to war -- few did. Obama did, but he was totally inexperienced and hadn't been in politics for a full decade yet.
I blame the National Education Association for the fact that most Americans under the age of 50 don't know how to evaluate issues and tend to vote for image. Massachusetts politics has given us the shabbiest politicians we've had in this country.
I think its to close to guess for the Democrats, but I'm sick of the Clinton's specially him. He is on more than she some days and I'm ready to start deleting commercials.
As for Romney...after the tornado he unleased in Massachusetts by pinching everybody's butt, I will say no more! Despite his appearance and his silky voice, he is NOT presidential material.
Massachusetts...vote for CHANGE...vote for the Brains that were behind Bill, Vote for Hillary. Her time has come. And Obama, come eight years from now, it just might be I'll wearing your sticker on my derriere, when you have a little more experience.
Aesop for Today, February 4
Aesop for Today, February 5
I don't think that Romney will win Mass. Most everyone I know, even republicans, do not like him. I only know one who plans to vote for him.
Well its different at least.
My picks for Massachusetts are:
Obama over Clinton (it will probably be tight)
Romney in a close call over McCain - Romney has alienated a lot of Massachusetts voters by running away from his record in this state.
Outside of MA, I'd guess Obama and Clinton will both do well and McCain will do better than Romney. We'll know soon.
I will have an article tonight on exit polls or early results then another one on the final.
Stay tuned.
Obama or Romney.
McCain, then after meeting Obama, Obama.
I've heard that Clinton may be our next President.