What is it with Christian Bale grabbing all the movie roles that have sequels attached to them? Despite his hissy fit over some poor louse who ruined a scene - according to Bale he was an amateur (mind you it is not for young ears, but at least you know that Bale isn't phoning in his performance). Hey, if you like a beat to your *&^%* tirades check out the remix! After the fun over Bale's rant mania ebbs, the question is if his performance as John Connor was worth his passion? If only you could see me shrugging my shoulders.
I'm not going to deny that 'Terminator Salvation' doesn't have its charms. The terminator army of gadgets is pretty awesome and worthy of some 'gotcha moments' in a theater seat. Further, the audience is introduced to some new characters such as Star (Jadagrace, who incidentally does not appear to be the daughter of Jada Pinkett and Will Smith although her name and age made me think that she might) a silent little mite surviving in Armageddon who seems to be able to ascertain the needs of those around her. Anton Yelchin plays the teen version of Kyle Reese who was played in the original 'Terminator' (1984) by Michael Biehn. (In the television show 'Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles' Reese is portrayed by Jonathon Jackson.) Yelchin might be familiar to recent movie
goers who have seen 'Star Trek' because he was Pavel Chekov (somewhere Zac Efron is weeping). Jane Alexander is also thrown into the mix for some reason, but her screen time is five minutes maybe and it seems as if her only purpose is to give Star some food before being yanked into a holding cell inside a Godzilla sized version of Terminators. Bryce Dallas Howard is inserted in the role of Kate Connor which makes sense because Claire Danes who created the character in 'Terminator 3:
Rise of the Machines' (2003) was paired with Nick Stahl, who I think it is safe to observe, was recast as John Connor. Of course what fun would any 'Terminator' film be if there wasn't at least a cameo of a certain someone. Oh who, oh who, could I possibly be writing about?
The bulk of the story though doesn't even involve the before mentioned characters. That honor goes to Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington) who opens the movie by being executed to only wake up in the dismal future. Before the execution he signs his body over to science and there is a whole scene where he asks for a kiss from his doctor, played by Helena Bonham-Carter who is dying from cancer, and he says something to the effect, "So this is what dying tastes like." Of course this seals up the idea that Wright is not a good guy, but is there any possibility he might redeem himself? What if he meets a sexy resistance fighter played by Moon Bloodgood?
As far as the feeling after walking out of the show, I have to acknowledge that I didn't feel as if this new 'Terminator' installment 'jumped the shark' but it felt close to the edge. Maybe I have that feeling because there is, I mean was, the television series (it has been canceled) thus as an observer of pop culture I think there has been a saturation of all things terminator. Seriously, how many jokes to we have to endure about the Governor of California being the Governator? I suppose I don't understand the logic of having a show about terminators canceled and then making a big budget movie? I wonder if the Halcyon Company, which owns the franchise, decided to green light the project just because they could. Granted, they had McG directing (best known for directing the 'Charlie's Angels' films, he is slated
for the 'Terminator' sequel assuming there is one) and Christine Bale hot off 'The Dark Knight,' but, in case they haven't looked around, the economy isn't doing so great and the main premise of the storyline is that all humans are living day to day in a 'Band of Brothers' scenario. Instead of Shirley Temple, we do have a cute vocally challenged poppet that doesn't even dance...yet she is a wiz at cooking two day old coyote.
Besides all the gloom and doom that one can image in a post apocalypse world, this version of 'Terminator' suffers from tough box office competition. Both 'X-Men Origins: Wolverine' and 'Star Trek' have more likeable characters and both are teeming with special
effects. Even 'Angels & Demons' had impressive special effects which transformed some soundstage into Vatican City which is a hell of a lot nicer to look at than L.A. after nuclear holocaust. Unlike 'Terminators' before, such as 'Terminator 2: Judgment Day' (1991) which took a moderately successful low budget film (which gained popularity primarily from cable showings) and transformed it into an event movie that shocked its audiences with mind blowing special effects and a loveable Terminator that had a comedic edge. It also had a hopeful message which is obviously lacking in the last two movies (I never saw any episodes of the television series).
I don't want to write that this latest 'Terminator' installment is a bad movie, it isn't really, but it's not the type of movie that 'T 2' was or even the original, it sort of stands on its own as a chapter to a story that someone can skip and still be on board as to what is happening in the 'Terminator' universe. Despite Bale's fit about being professional on a film set, his performance isn't rant worthy. To be honest, there isn't that much for him to do except fight terminators and look noble which he does accomplish. I suppose in many ways this film, more than the others, puts the franchise at a crossroads. It can either expand on the characters it has introduced such as Star or Jane Alexander's who can become an elder sage for humanity; or it can simple fizzle out with hopes of being rebooted in a decade or so
as the 'Star Trek' franchise has been under the command of J. J. Abrams. In any event, unless you are a HUGE 'Terminator' fan or have seen everything else in the summer offering, I would recommend waiting for 'Terminator Salvation' to come out on DVD or cable.

Westerfield © 2009


Comments: 31
While this doesn't fit my taste in movies, I must say I thoroughly enjoyed your comprehensive and entertaining review!
Kimberly, thank you. As you may be able to tell, I have been experimenting with hyperlinks.
Great Review and not my taste either sorry!
Norene, no need to be sorry.
i watched the new movie and U didn't like it. I liked the rest of them that was made but this new one.
Sally, yeah, this was probably the weakest of the series.
Spicecomments.com - Hi Hey Hello Comments
Connie, hi to you as well.
As always, I loved your review; but since I never even saw the first movie, I sure as hell ain't gonna waste my time on this one.
Mugg, well if you haven't seen the first one yet (and it came out in 1984) that probably means that you aren't going to watch it ever.
I have never watched any of the Terminator movies, but I wouldn't mind watching Arnold's. There is always some entertainment value in anything he does, even if it is not always of the intended variety.
Ashley, my favorite was 'T 2' which I think still stands up well despite coming out in 1991.
I have always been mildly amused by the Terminator flicks~I saw only the first one in the cinema, the rest I waited for until they hit the glass teat or the dvd store.
Your review was extraordinarily grin inducing as your reviews usually are~
Though it doesn't sound very promising, I am quite partial to eye candy and will subject myself to the most inane movies to oogle a nice piece of a**~Christian Bale fits that jellybean quite nicely~but I doubt I'll hop into a cinema for this one and just patiently wait for the dvd.
Prrrr, you are correct on the eye candy front, it does have that.
Thank you for posting your smile inducing review to GutterGirls~
You are now featured ;)
Prrr, thank you for the feature! Very cool!
Will definitely go to see this movie!
Savo, if you are a fan of the series then you should see it.
This isn't one I want to see, even on DVD. Just not my kind of flick. The one I am looking forward to is Transformers, which also isn't my kind of movie, but the comical dialog of the characters makes me like it. Thanks for the review.
Marianne, I saw the first 'Transformers' movie on cable and HATED IT! Yet, I have to admit that the previews for the sequel look pretty damn good.
From the other other less than stellar reviews I think I can give this one a miss until it comes out on DVD. That it got beat by a crummy Ben Stiller kid's movie sequel should say something.
Paul, it does indeed say something. I didn't like the first 'Night at the Museum' I'm pretty sure I will despise the new one.
I love your reviews. I haven't seen this one yet. Will probably catch it on cable.
Kimber, thank you. There are much better films out in the theater to see.
I've never seen a Terminator movie before, but this one actually looks interesting. Do you think a Terminator virgin could follow it easily enough? If I'd have to watch the Ahnuld movies, I'd rather just avoid it.
Whether or not I'd like the movie, I certainly enjoyed the review!
Kris, you have never seen a 'Terminator' movie? Are you kidding? I think you would 'get' the storyline for the most part. Here's a breakdown for you.
Terminator - 1984, A man comes from the future to find a woman who will be the mother of the future savior of humanity because she has trained him to fight the terminators. A terminator (Arnold) is sent to the past to find said woman to kill her before she goes into hiding and gives birth to her son. Reese, the man becomes the father of the child. The arm of the terminator (after he is dead) is obtained by a private research firm called Skynet.
T 2 Judgment Day - 1991, the boy is in foster care because his mother is a conspiracy theorist. Arnold is a terminator who comes back in search of the boy, but in this case it is to save him from a more powerful terminator. Together they break the mother out of a mental health institution and she decides to kill the scientist who is credited with creating Skynet (based on the technology gathered from the arm of the first Terminator). They don't kill the scientist, but they do convince him that the future will be horrible if he continues his research. The terminator self destructs/dies because his existence is too risky for humanity.
T 3 Rise of the Machines - 2003, John Connor is a young man still hiding out. His mother is dead and he is living off the grid. He meets up with another terminator (Arnold again) and assumes that he has sent this terminator back in time, as he has done the others, but it turns out that his wife has. She is a vet whom he knew when they were kids and he lived in foster care. Her father is an military something and the movie ends with him sending them to some hideout. At the end of the movie Skynet takes over and most of civilization has been blown to bits.
I hope that helps.
Argh ... Kris do not read Lady Westerfield's post, and just go see - rent - the first Terminator movie. If you like it watch the second ... then skip the next two! ;-)
Going back over you review just makes me dislike this movie even more ... I must have blotted some of the bad parts out of my mind ... like the idiotic scenes at the beginning with the execution, and the Helen Bonham Carter as Skynet thing. My favorite movies are being decimated this year, first Star Trek, and now this. Horrible.
I saw the first 2 on the big screen but am now terminator pooped out.
(LOVE Bale, though - he can blow up on his set anytime he likes, he works dang hard at his craft)