
President Kennedy also passed through Omaha, but only for a brief stop at the Strategic Air Command headquarters there. In those days, SAC was an instantly recognized acronym because the bombers it comprised—some of which we could see because they were always in the air ready to respond in case of an attack—were a central component of America’s Cold War military strategy. More memorable for me was a visit to SAC by the president’s brother Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy. The younger Kennedy was a striking contrast to the president, who had been smiling and chatty with the local press and even more impressive in person than on television. Unlike the president, who was always meticulously and elegantly dressed, the attorney general was wearing a rumpled suit, and the collar on his blue button-down shirt was frayed. He was plainly impatient, and his mood did not improve when I asked for a reaction to Alabama governor George Wallace’s demand that JFK resign the presidency because of his stance on school desegregation. Bobby fixed those icy blue eyes on me and said, as if I were to blame for the governor’s statement, “I have no comment on anything Governor Wallace has to say.”
I was on duty in the newsroom a few weeks later when the United Press International wire-service machine began to sound its bulletin bells. I walked over casually and began to read a series of sentences breaking in staccato fashion down the page:
three shots were fired at president kennedy’s motorcade in downtown dallas . . . flash—kennedy seriously wounded, perhaps fatally by assassin’s bullet . . . president john f. kennedy died at approximately 1:00 pm (cst).
John F. Kennedy, the man I had thought would define the political ideal for the rest of my days, was suddenly gone in the senseless violence of a single moment. In ways we could not have known then, the gunshots in Dealey Plaza triggered a series of historic changes: the quagmire of Vietnam that led to the fall of Lyndon Johnson as president; the death of Robert Kennedy in pursuit of the presidency; and the comeback, presidency, and subsequent disgrace of Richard Nixon.
On that beautiful late autumn November morning, however, my immediate concern was to get this story on the air. I rushed the news onto our noon broadcast, and as I was running back to the newsroom, one of the station’s Kennedy haters said, “What’s up?”
I responded, “Kennedy’s been shot.”
He said, “It’s about time someone got the son of a bitch.”
Given the gauzy shades of popular memory, the invocations of Camelot and JFK as our nation’s prince, it may be surprising to younger Americans to know that President Kennedy was not universally beloved.
Now Kennedy was gone, and this man was glad. I lunged toward him, but another co-worker pulled me away. The rest of the day is mostly a blur except for one riveting memory.
As I was speeding out toward SAC headquarters to see what restrictions they were putting on the base, I began to talk aloud to myself. “This doesn’t happen in America,” I said, still a child of the innocence of the Fifties. And then I distinctly remember thinking, “This will change us. I don’t know how, but this will change us.” And of course it did. It was November 22, 1963, and it was, in effect, the beginning of what we now call the Sixties. Kennedy’s death was stunning not just because he was president. He was such a young president, and his election just three years before had kindled the dreams and aspirations of the young generation he embodied and inspired. His death seemed to rob us of all that was youthful and elegant, cool and smart, hopeful and idealistic. Who now would stir our generation by suggesting we “ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country”?
Please join me on Monday, December 17th at 7 p.m. ET in the Books Essential for a live chat to talk about BOOM! and your thoughts on the Sixties.


Comments: 23
Thanks for posting this.
We should ask ourselves this more now a days.
Of course, Jack was a conservative Democrat, unlike his younger brother. And Jack WAS a WWII veteran with a REAL purple heart.
However, when I think of the 60's, all I can think of is smelly long haired drop outs who were always stoned. There WERE no leaders. I remember falling for John Wayne because he was strong and said what he felt. The 60's is not a decade to glorify or applaud. It's a decade of filth, self centered hippies who begged on the streets and then spat upon my brother as he returned from Vietnam, and a decade of the downfall of mankind.
The 60's did seem to be the start of a society breakdown that never made it back up again.
Mr. Brokaw: I was a freshman in High School English class and President Kennedy's death had an effect on me. I guess I was innocently naive enough to believe that our nation's leaders were made of steel. What a sad reality.
I agree with Jan - The decade of the 1960's was a turning point not just for the creative folks out there but for people with alternative ideas. My father's was a chiropractor. His business picked up in the 60's. He was born in 1891 so he wasn't young but he enjoyed the fact that people now were open to alternative health-care.
He enjoyed the good that each era provided. Salud.
Women? Oh great, so now not only do we get equal pay (NOT) and are free to NOT wear a bra (not, though I've not worn one in over 25 years) we now can have irresponsible sex and IF we get pregnant we can just kill our unborn child. Yep, that a wonderful turning point. STD's, rape, abuse on women rose dramatically in the 60's Oh Joy!
Artists and writers? Never knew they were oppressed, in fact, artitists haven't been oppressed since the 1300's. I guess a painting of a soup can could be considered a "turning point" in the art world or a cross in a jar of urine as freedom to express contempt a turning point.
Students? A turning point for students? What? Oh, you mean they can now smoke pot with there "teachers"? No, I hated being a part of the academic world in the 60's. Students were protesting anything and everything mostly just to get out of class. Nope, I didn't experience the 60's as any positive. And if Woodstock is the epitome of the 60's then it should be renamed to Livestock. Hippies rolling around in the mud, having sex out in the open, doing drugs, passing out and leaving massive, massive amounts of garbage behind. Oh yeah. Great bloody time those 60's.
Accupuncture, Reiki, yoga, meditation have been around for centuries. Nothing new and the 60's are not responsible for bring those alternative methods to light.
You are right on about a mix of reaction in the United States, "it may be surprising to younger Americans to know that President Kennedy was not universally beloved."
My personal experience was the failure of my school (I was a sophomore in high school) to mark that tragedy by either sending us home or having an in-school observance. It wasn't until later in life that I realized most schools strived to inform and counsel students by one or both of those actions.
Thank you for a great book on those turbulent times.
Cheers,
Colonel Possum
I covered my high school Kennedy experience in a recently posted tale to your site, Boom!:
Boom! The Plaskett Creek Casanovas
From that story, my story:
"I was in my Junior English class struggling through an Old English recitation of Beowulf when a classmate ran through the door and shouted, "The President has been shot!" Our teacher, Mr. Dill, was a portly old geezer with jowls and half glasses that were intently focused on his left hand. He had somehow cut it the week before and was preoccupied with picking at a freshly formed scab. After the surprise announcement, he continued picking away in silence. Time did a double-clutch downshift to granny low. Pick. Pick. Pick. Pick. Finally, Mr. Dill looked over his glasses at the distraught messenger and said, "That is indeed a shame." He then turned slowly to us and commanded, "Back to Beowulf!"
Thanks again for getting us old timers fired up to post our tales!!!
Cheers,
Colonel Possum
I think that the death of JFK was a profound shock to the nation. As were the deaths of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King. People who were leaders -- who represented many people were killed because of what they believed, said, and stood for. What was shocking was how un-American it was that they be killed for this. Whether you agreed with these men or not, our American culture, since the time of the revolution, has been to have and allow people to freely speak out as to what they believe, to practice their religion and take positions on issues. To be killed for being one who spoke out was what was part of the shock. Ours was not a nation where you should be afraid to take a stand. That is what was part of the shock of these assassinations.
Proof of the "enlightment" of the 60's Do drugs and have wanton loveless sex for self gratification.
I've been catching bits and pieces of the current series on the History channel (if I'm wrong, oh well) with Mr. Brokaw regarding the sixties, and I find it very interesting. There is so much footage that I had never seen before. I especially enjoy the footage and information regarding Timothy Leary.
I suggest that everyone read, aside from "Boom!" of course, "Timothy Leary: A Biography" by Robert Greenfield. It's probably the only neutral book written about Leary, and it contains all the good AND bad parts of his life.
Good post!