"It's hard to consider someone your "best" friend just because they always sign their messages with :)."
I consider myself an Average Joe, someone who inhabits the middle of most bell-shaped curves. As such, according to a recent Duke University study, I've lost one of my three "best" friends over the past 20 years. Now I'm down to two. I know someone is missing, but Duke is not telling me who, exactly, that is.
The study concludes that the average American has two people today in whom they confide, down from three in 1985. According to this analysis, the causes are probably increased work hours and the influence of the Internet - and it's not often one sees the word "probably" in a scientific paper, which says something about the study, about Duke and about science.
One result of this sociological change is that fewer contacts are created through clubs, neighbors and organizations. Robert D. Putnam refers to this condition as the "bowling alone" syndrome in a book with that same title.
At least the friend I lost didn't suffer a violent demise. He/she just trickled away over the past two decades, electron-by-electron, evaporated you might say, as I spent more and more time in front of my screens - computer, TV and cell. Maybe the California attorney general should check into this. Death by electronic dribble sounds a lot more humane than lethal injection.
The bad news is that the responsibility for his/her death sits squarely on my shoulders and shows no sign of jumping off any time soon. Extra afternoons playing Pac-Man, too many downloads off iTunes and, in general, choosing my mouse over my mouth has kidnapped my attention from flesh and blood people and into MySpace. If it weren't for consumer electronics, he/she would still be on my speed dial but, then, I wouldn't have a speed dial if it weren't for consumer electronics. It's all so complicated.
My missing best friend died of neglect and I am sadder for it. Research shows that intimate relationships (of the best friend kind not the bed sheets kind) are the single most determinant factor in an individual's "happiness" level. The second important factor is having your team win the Super Bowl, if you are a man, or having a husband who doesn't watch the Super Bowl, if you are a woman.
Today's relationships are diluted rather than dense. True, we have wider input from more people electronically, but the interaction is shallower and we miss many of the nonverbal cues we get when in face-to-face communication. There is nothing like a flesh-and-blood fist in your face to let you know how someone feels about you. Psychologists refer to this as "authentic communication.""
You can't intuit someone's tone of voice from an email, even if they tag it with an emoticon, the Internet version of the teenage girl's smiley face signature. It's hard to consider someone your "best" friend just because they always sign their messages with :).
There is less ego risk when you "hide" in your computer, but that restricts the growth you might undergo resolving personal issues and learning how to get on with others. It also doesn't do much for your physique to sit in a swivel chair all day.
On the other hand, kids who are naturally shy, or whose acne or body weight makes them retiring, may blossom in a society of electronic relationships where they don't have to worry about accent, speech impediments, skin color, what they're wearing, what they're driving or if they pick their nose every 30 seconds. With all of that going for electronic communication, it's a wonder we talk to anyone face-to-face.
With a library of ringtones now attached to everyone on my contact list, people have become songs. I can't remember my dentist's face, but whenever I hear anything sung by The House of Pain, I get a chill down my back, my mouth twitches and I call out for my dentist's suction tube, Mr. Thirsty.
More disturbing, there have been studies that link isolation and loneliness to mental and physical illness. That means I need to spend less time online. I could go through my old phonebooks and contact people I used to know to see if they want to reconnect. After all, they've lost a best friend too.
It's either that or paint a smiley face on my bowling ball. I think I'll call him Fred.
###


Comments: 144
Great article John!
I'd better go check my address book . . .
Blessings ~
Rene
I have also made some great friends via the computer, but it is a different type/level of relationship. Better in some ways, not as satisfying in others.
And I agree about the smiley-faced bowling ball rocking.
However, the fact we've never met is no excuse for not staying up with my articles.
There doesn't seem to be the strength and longevity in the computer relationships. Easier to "walk away."
Fred is a great name. Ralph works too.
I have friends email me now and say they've lost my phone number. And I think, what happened to calling "Information."
Lily Tomlin must be very upset.
Maybe I'll do just what you suggest. Thanks.
I think it is indeed a challenge to maintain good friendships in this computer age. Even so, a good friend may be about to marry someone met online. It works both ways. But I've seen the potential for all the worst effects you note.
I know I say this often (or should) about pieces you write...but I loved this. Truly.
Great article...I think there are pros and cons...my best friend lives miles away and so the computer allows us to communicate as often as we like. No it isn't face to face, but it's more communication than we would have if the computer wasn't available.
On the other hand, reading La Bellota's recent articles on connections versus friends, I have to agree that we really do only have one or two close friends...the others are connections or acquaintances...whatever... But, hey, I really think that we make our own decisions about what/who is important in our lives...so if I fail to keep up with your articles...well... after all, we've never even met!
Z'
That people exhibit that shallowness, in virtually every comment one reads on these threads, is obvious, but I don't believe causal, in any pronounced way. Perhaps confirmational, and re-enforcing, but not so much as the main-stream-media, which has come to dominate the "collective consciousness" of our society.
One *giggle* and *blush* and I'll feel right at home again.
Incidentally, I can make a pretty strong case that the "shallowness" of thinking you refer to is a result of how our brains are dealing with too much information.
Not a case I want to get into now and certainly not before some major meds kick in.
When my phone rings it's Verizon's default ring. Everyone around me looks and says, there's a guy who just bought a phone.
This is the 21st century version of leaving in the photo that came with your new wallet.
But can you underline?
I currently have 2, and one is my husband. The other best friend changes with locations and lifestyles, but for the last three years has been a girl half my age. It gets kinda funny when I have to explain things from "back in the day" to her. For a while she thought the Big Bopper was a hamburger. Sigh........
Anyway, this isolationism grows with each generation. I don't see it taking the place of "real" relationships, and in fact, embrace that which is good in it. I can chat with someone in Mongolia if I desire...and can speak the language..
Finding out, from someone a world away, that we have the same hopes, dreams, fears, and feelings, changes one's way of thinking from and "us" and "them" mentality to a "we".
Kids should be encouraged to turn away from the electronics - but mostly for safety and health reasons.
Death by electronic dribble. Neat. Perhaps each day that a prisoner sits on death row, someone could go in aith a pair of toe-nail (or finger-nail - depending on gruesomeness of crime) and snip off just one little piece of the condemned. After about twenty years, the condemned would be gone.
I think the question your comment raises is whether or not the Justice Department considers death by electronic dribble torture.
Underline like italcs, just use "u" instead of "i."
I love the cross-generational relationship concept, which the internet facilitates. When I was in college, I spent a good part of two years hanging out with some of the Boston Symphony musicians. I learned a lot from those "cats."
Another good point, the international aspect of all of this. Thanks.
There is some good news though. Julie is real. Ah, but how to find her.....
That pretty much knocks me down to zero friends, except ... Oh, Julie ...
(besides having 4 fingers and a thumb)-love that line.
I was wondering: if you type your emoticons in italics, is it like having a sexy foreign accent?
Based on the number of responses and depth of thought in them, you must have hit a nerve in our collective circuit. I agree with Sara H. this piece would fit very well in the back of Newsweek.
i'm so confused. And what time is it? Even Gather seems confused.
Italic emoticons as sexy foreign accents? Very clever, Jane — what a mind you have.
I am not confused. Cabo was on Mountain Time so there was an hour adjustment on arrival. But then yesterday the US went Daylight, and Mexico stayed Standard (until the old change date in April) so that put me back in synch with California time and I had no change returning last night.
Bet you're really confused now :)
Good to hear the other side of the online relationship coin. Good for you.
Your icon looks like the beach I just left — not that sunny and 64 in California is that hard to talk.
I wouldn't obsess over the use of emoticons. If you were a guy, I would of course worry about any use of them.
BTW, according to my emoticon dictionary: :-* mean a kiss
Apparently decades of interfacing with women has resulted in no learning for the men at all. But, in their defense, women often talk to them during sporting events.
[No need for anyone to say anything; I'm digging.]
I was born the day my son introduced me to something called a computer. After several break downs in our relationship because he's so fast and opens zillions of windows and I can't keep up with him, I got myself a laptop.
The second day somebody contacted me through something called the web. It was a HE, and of course we fell in love. But I caught him chatting with another SHE. So I decided we wouldn't marry, while another HE appeared, together with a younger She, who became the daughter I never had, and suddenly a sweet blond little girl was calling me ma. I didn't have to go through the pain of giving birth, no vaccines, no nothing, everything had been fixed.
I got a cook through some ads which appeared on the right side menu, had delivery every day, met a group which took me to Andromeda, or so they said, and I didn't have to be an astronaut to do all that.
Suddenly my HE told me he wanted out of the relationship, but there was another HE waiting, a had a very long mailing list.
So I "decided" to start writing, because I had been told by some writer that I wrote interesting articles. That was great, I hadn't noticed before I was born to the web that I could write anything at all, I used to answer questions. Suddenly I was thrusted into a site where people were reading what I wrote, but I couldn't remember when and how I had written them.
Many things happened in the midst of all this, I can't bore you with them because all my memory is filed in folders at "my documents" and "shared documents" (I wonder whom I'm sharing them with, but who cares).
Now I'm here, and I've been asked to post the following "first name". I did. Then I was asked to post "last name". I did that to. I only see the L of the latter at my profile, and I realised I was 108 years when the system didn't allow me to post the year 1959. So maybe I'm really 108 years old and don't know it.
Thak you for inviting me and being my friend.
Great article, I had a good laugh,
used to be Daniela, I found that in one of my files.
Hope you can make it — or any Monday. I'm always there.
OK I wasn't there last week because I was in Mexico but my spirit was there — or here.
I do take exception to one point you made however--you said
"second important factor is having your team win the Super Bowl, if you are a man, or having a husband who doesn't watch the Super Bowl, if you are a woman"
I would change that a bit. I would change "having a husband who doesnt watch the Super Bowl" to "having a husband who doesn't cheat" I don't mind a man who wants to watch the game....
Just my opinion.
This was a great article, thank you.
I got lucky and found 2 social clubs where I have met others and the membership for them is under $20 a year ... just the cosat of affiliation and newsletters.
And perhaps those trickled away friendships are just a part of life.